Volume 37 - Article 37 | Pages 1245–1274
Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
By Michaela Kreyenfeld, Esther Geisler, Teresa Castro Martín, Tina Hannemann, Valerie Heintz-Martin, Marika Jalovaara, Hill Kulu, Silvia Meggiolaro, Dimitri Mortelmans, Inge Pasteels, Marta Seiz, Anne Solaz
References
Andreß, H.-J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., and Hummelsheim, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution: A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden. European Sociological Review 22(5): 533–560.
Andreß, H.-J. and Bröckel, M. (2007). Marital disruption in Germany: Does the conservative welfare state care? Changes in material well-being and the effects of private and public transfers. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(2): 193–226.
Beaujouan, É. and Solaz, A. (2013). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population 29(1): 39–67.
Beaujouan, É. and Wiles-Portier, E. (2011). Second-union fertility in France: Partners’ age and other factors. Population 66(2): 239–274.
Boisson, M. and Wisnia-Weill, V. (2012). Désunion et paternité. Paris: Centre d’analyse stratégique (Note d’analyse, n°294).
Bröckel, M. and Andreß, H.-J. (2015). The economic consequences of divorce in Germany: What has changed since the turn of the millennium? Comparative Population Studies 40(3): 277–312.
Burkhauser, R.V., Duncan, G.J., Hauser, R., and Berntsen, R. (1991). Wife or frau, women do worse: A comparison of men and women in the United States and Germany after marital dissolution. Demography 28(3): 353–360.
Carlson, M.J. and Furstenberg, F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban U.S. parents. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(3): 718–732.
Castles, F.G. (2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences, and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 13(3): 209–227.
Duvander, A.-Z., Lappegård, T., and Andersson, G. (2010). Family policy and fertility: Fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy 20(1): 45–57.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
EUROSTAT (2015). Fertility indicators [electronic resource]. Europäische Kommission.
Gałęzewska, P. (2016). Repartnering dynamics and fertility in new partnerships in Europe and the United States. [PhD thesis]. Southampton: University of Southampton.
Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research Policy Review 26(3): 323–346.
Gooley, T.A., Leisenring, W., Crowley, J., and Storer, B.E. (1999). Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: New representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine 18(6): 695–706.
Griffith, J.D., Koo, H.P., and Suchindran, C.M. (1985). Childbearing and family in remarriage. Demography 22(1): 73–88.
Guzzo, K. and Furstenberg, F. (2007a). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography 44(3): 583–601.
Guzzo, K. and Furstenberg, F. (2007b). Multipartnered fertility among young women with a nonmarital first birth: Prevalence and risk factors. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(1): 29–38.
Hannemann, T. and Kulu, H. (2015). Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom. Demographic Research 33(10): 273–312.
Heintz-Martin, V., Le Bourdais, C., and Hamplová, D. (2014). Childbearing among Canadian stepfamilies. Canadian Studies in Population 41(1–2): 61–77.
Henz, U. (2002). Childbirth in East and West German stepfamilies: Estimated probabilities from hazard rate models. Demographic Research 7(6): 307–342.
Henz, U. and Thomson, E. (2005). Union stability and stepfamily fertility in Austria, Finland, France, and West Germany. European Journal of Population 21(1): 3–29.
Hogan, D.P. (1978). The variable order of events in the life course. American Sociological Review 43(4): 573–586.
Holland, J.A. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–1999. Population Studies 65(1): 115–128.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2013). Estadística denulidades, separaciones y divorcios [electronic resource]. INEbase.
ISTAT (2014). Separazioni e divorzi in Italia: Anno 2012 [electronic resource]. Istituto nazionale di statistica.
Kalwij, A. (2010). The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in western Europe. Demography 47(2): 503–519.
Kindler, H. and Walper, S. (2016). Das Wechselmodell im Kontext elterlicher Konflikte. Neue Zeitschrift für Familienrecht 3(18): 820–824.
Klett-Davies, M. (2016). Under pressure? Single parents in the United Kingdom. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Kravdal, Ø. (1996). How the local supply of day-care centers influences fertility in Norway: A parity-specific approach. Population Research and Policy Review 15(3): 201–218.
Kravdal, Ø. (2001). The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: An artefact of the separate modelling of each parity transition. Demographic Research 5(6): 187–215.
Kreyenfeld, M. and Bastin, S. (2015). Reliability of union histories in social science surveys: Blurred memory, deliberate misreporting, or true tales? Advances in Life Course Research 27: 30–42.
Kreyenfeld, M., Huinink, J., Trappe, H., and Walke, R. (2012). DemoDiff: A dataset for the study of family change in Eastern (and Western) Germany. Schmollers Jahrbuch 132(4): 653–660.
Kreyenfeld, M., Konietzka, D., and Heintz-Martin, V. (2016). Lebens- und Familienformen. In: Niephaus, Y., Kreyenfeld, M., and Sackmann, R. (eds.). Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 303–325.
Kreyenfeld, M. and Martin, V. (2011). Economic conditions of stepfamilies from a cross-national perspective. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23(2): 128–153.
Kulu, H. and Hannemann, T. (2015). Why does fertility remain high among certain United Kingdom-born ethnic minority women? Brussels: European Commission, Socioeconomic Sciences and Humanities (Families and Societies working paper series 39: 67–97).
Lauwereys, G., Neels, K., and De Winter, T. (2011). Wave 1. Response rate calculation. The Hague: Generations and Gender Programme (GGP Belgium paper series 3).
Lenze, A. (2014). Alleinerziehende unter Druck: Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen, finanzielle Lage und Reformbedarf. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Manlove, J., Logan, C., Ikramullah, E., and Holcombe, E. (2008). Factors associated with multiple-partner fertility among fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(2): 536–548.
Martin, V. (2008). Stepfamilies in Canada: Numbers, characteristics, stability, and childbearing. [Phd. thesis]. Montreal: McGill University, Department of Sociology.
McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions, and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research 17(1): 1–16.
Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2010). The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research 23(34): 963–996.
National Institute for Health and Welfare (2016). Child maintenance and custody 2015 [electronic resource]. National Institute for Health and Welfare.
Neyer, G. (2003). Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe. Journal of Population and Social Security 1(Suppl.): 46–93.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1986). Women’s paid work and the timing of births. Longitudinal evidence. European Journal of Population 2(1): 43–70.
Ongaro, F., Mazzuco, S., and Meggiolaro, S. (2009). Economic consequences of union dissolution in Italy: Finding from the European Community Household Panel. European Journal of Population 25(1): 45–65.
Orloff, A.S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review 58(3): 303–328.
Scott, M., Peterson, K., Ikramullah, E., and Manlove, J. (2013). Multiple partner fertility among unmarried nonresident fathers. In: Cabrera, N. and Tamis-LeMonda, C. (eds.). Handbook of father involvement: Multidisclinary perspectives. New York: Routledge: 97–115.
Testa, M.R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007 : 353–377.
Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review 37(1): 57–87.
Thomson, E. (2004). Step-families and childbearing desires in Europe. Demographic Research, special collection 3(5): 117–134.
Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the Unites States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography 51(2): 485–508.
Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723–774.
Vikat, A., Thomson, E., and Hoem, J.M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies 53(1): 211–225.
Vikat, A., Thomson, E., and Prskawetz, A. (2004). Childbearing responsibility and stepfamily fertility in Finland and Austria. European Journal of Population 20(1): 1–21.
Wood, J. (2016). Essays on socioeconomic differentiation in European fertility: The impact of economic context and social policy. [PhD thesis]. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.