Volume 37 - Article 60 | Pages 1917–1932
Dating across and hooking 'up': Status and relationship formation at an elite liberal arts university
By Kristine Kilanski, David McClendon
References
Allison, R. and Risman, B.J. (2013). A double standard for hooking up: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research 42(5): 1191‒1206.
Allison, R. and Risman, B.J. (2014). It goes hand in hand with the parties: Race, class, and residence in college negotiations of hooking up. Sociological Perspectives 57(1): 102‒123.
Armstrong, E.A., England, P., and Fogarty, A.C.K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review 77(3): 435‒462.
Armstrong, E.A. and Hamilton, L.T. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Armstrong, E.A., Hamilton, L.T., and England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for women? Contexts 9(3): 22‒27.
Brimeyer, T.M. and Smith, W.L. (2012). Religion, race, social class, and gender differences in dating and hooking up among college students. Sociological Spectrum 32(5): 462‒473.
DeSantis, A.D. (2007). Inside Greek U: Fraternities, sororities, and the pursuit of pleasure, power, and prestige. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
England, P. and Bearak, J. (2014). The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students. Demographic Research 30(46): 1327‒1338.
Glenn, N. and Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on mating and dating today. New York: Institute for American Values.
Gordon, M. and Wilson, S.R. (1969). Status inconsistency and satisfaction with sorority membership. Social Forces 48(2): 176‒183.
Hamilton, L. (2014). The revised MRS: Gender complimentary at college. Gender and Society 28(2): 236‒264.
Hamilton, L. (2007). Trading on heterosexuality: College women’s gender strategies and homophobia. Gender and Society 21(2): 145‒172.
Handler, L. (1995). In the fraternal sisterhood: Sororities as gender strategy. Gender and Society 9(2): 236‒255.
Holland, D.C. and Eisenhart, M.A. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, college achievement, and college culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kalmijn, M. and Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces 79(4): 1289‒1312.
Kuperberg, A. and Padgett, J.E. (2015). Dating and hooking up in college: Meeting contexts, sex, and variation by gender, partner’s gender and class standing. The Journal of Sex Research 52(5): 517‒531.
Kuperberg, A. and Padgett, J.E. (2016). The role of culture in explaining college student’s selection into hookups, dates and long-term relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 33(8): 1070‒1096.
LaBrie, J.W., Hummer, J.F., Ghaidarov, T.M., Lac, A., and Kenney, S.R. (2014). Hooking up in the college context: The event-level effects of alcohol use and partner familiarity on hookup behaviors and contentment. Journal of Sex Research 5(1): 62‒73.
Laumann, E.O., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martin, P.Y. (2016). The rape prone culture of academic contexts: Fraternities and athletics. Gender and Society 30(1): 30‒43.
Martin, P.Y. and Hummer, R.A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society 3(4): 457‒473.
McClintock, E.A. (2014). Beauty and status: The illusion of exchange in partner selection? American Sociological Review 79(4): 575‒604.
McClintock, E.A. (2010). When does race matter? Race, sex, and dating at an elite university. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(1): 45‒72.
Nicholson, M.E., Wang, M.Q., Maney, D., Yuan, J., Mahoney, B.S., and Adame, D.D. (1998). Alcohol related violence and unwanted sexual activity on the college campus. American Journal of Health Studies 14(1): 1‒10.
Paul, E.L. and Hayes, K.A. (2002). The causalities of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19(5): 639‒661.
Ray, R. and Rosow, J.A. (2010). Getting off and getting intimate: How normative institutional arrangements structure black and white fraternity men’s approaches toward women. Men and Masculinities 12(5): 523–546.
Ray, R. and Rosow, J.A. (2012). The two different worlds of black and white fraternity men: Visibility and accountability as mechanisms of privilege. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41(1): 66‒94.
Ridgeway, C. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review 79(1): 1‒16.
Risman, B. (1982). College women and sororities: The social construction of gender roles. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 11(2): 231‒252.
Robbins, A. (2004). Pledged: The secret life of sorority sisters. New York: Hyperion Books.
Sanday, P.R. (2007). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Schwartz, C.R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology 39(1): 451–470.
Strombler, M. (1994). ‘Buddies or slutties’: The collective sexual reputation of fraternity little sisters. Gender and Society 8(3): 297‒323.
Sweeney, B.N. (2011). The allure of the freshman girl: Peers, partying, and the sexual assault of first-year college women. Journal of College and Character 12(4): 1‒15.
Uecker, J.R., Pearce, L.D., and Andercheck, B. (2015). The four U’s: Latent classes of hookup motivations among college students. Social Currents 2(2): 163‒181.
Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. New York: Norton.
Waller, W. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review 2(5): 727‒734.