Volume 38 - Article 50 | Pages 1535–1576
A regional perspective on the economic determinants of urban transition in 19th-century France
By Philippe Bocquier, Sandra Brée
References
Adams, J.J. (2017). Urbanization, long-run growth, and the demographic transition. Gainsville: University of Florida, Department of Economics (Unpublished working paper).
Bairoch, P. (1996). Cinq millénaires de croissance urbaine. In: Sachs, I. (ed.). Quelles villes, pour quel développement. Paris: Puf: 17‒60.
Bairoch, P. (1988). Cities and economic development: From the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bardet, J.-P. (1997). Fécondité et natalité. In: Bardet, J.-P. and Dupâquier, J. (eds.). Histoire des populations de l’Europe: I. Des origines aux prémices de la révolution démographique. Paris: Fayard: 316‒343.
Bardet, J.-P. (1998). La France en déclin. In: Bardet, J.-P. and Dupâquier, J. (eds.). Histoire des populations de l’Europe: II. La révolution démographique, 1750‒1914. Paris: Fayard: 287–325.
Bardet, J.-P. (1983). Rouen aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: SEDES.
Baudin, T. and Stelter, R. (2016). Rural exodus and fertility at the time of industrialization. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Économiques et Sociales (Discussion paper 2016-20).
Bocquier, P. (2015). The future of urban projections: Suggested improvements on the UN method. Spatial Demography 2(2): 1‒14.
Bocquier, P. (2005). World urbanization prospects: An alternative to the UN model of projection compatible with urban transition theory. Demographic Research 12(9): 197‒236.
Bocquier, P. and Costa, R. (2015). Which transition comes first? Urban and demographic transitions in Belgium and Sweden. Demographic Research 33(48): 1297‒1332.
Brée, S. (2015). La population de la région parisienne au XIXe siècle. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, Centre de recherche en démographie (Working paper 6).
Brée, S. (2017). Paris l'inféconde: La limitation des naissances en région parisienne au XIXe siècle. Paris: Ined Éditions.
Châtelain, A. (1967). Les migrations temporaires françaises au XIXe siècle: Problèmes, méthodes, documentation. Annales de Démographie Historique 1967: 9–28.
Christiaensen, L., Gindelsky, M., and Jedwab, R. (2013). Rural push, urban pull or... urban push? New historical evidence from 40 developing countries [electronic resource]. Silver Spring: Editorialexpress.com.
de Vries, J. (1984). European urbanization, 1500‒1800. London: Methuen.
de Vries, J. (1990). Problems in the measurement, description, and analysis of historical urbanization. In: van der Woude, A., Yayami, A., and de Vries, J. (eds.). Urbanization in history. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 43‒60.
Dormois, J.-P. (2005). Le visible et les invisibles: La productivité des services en France et en Angleterre au cours de l’industrialisation. Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine 52(4): 152‒181.
Dyson, T. (2011). The role of the demographic transition in the process of urbanization. Population and Development Review 37(1): 34‒54.
Fox, S. (2012). Urbanization as a global historical process: Theory and evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review 38(2): 285‒310.
Garden, M. and Le Bras, H. (1988). La dynamique régionale. In: Dupâquier, J. (ed.). Histoire de la population française: III. De 1789 à 1914. Paris: Puf: 138‒162.
Henderson, J.V., Roberts, M., and Storeygard, A. (2013). Is urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa different? Washington, D.C.: World Bank (Policy research working paper 6481).
Heywood, C. (1981). The role of the peasantry in French industrialization, 1815–1880. The Economic History Review 34(3): 359‒376.
Kesztenbaum, L. (2006). Une histoire d’espace et de patrimoine: Familles et migration dans la France de la Troisième République, 1870‒1940. [PhD thesis]. Paris: L’Institut d’Études Politiques.
Knodel, J. and Van de Walle, E. (1979). Lessons from the past: Policy implications of historical fertility studies. Population and Development Review 5(2): 217‒245.
Lerch, M. and Stegemann, L. (2017). City growth in international perspective: The case of industrializing Zurich 1760‒1949. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 26‒29, 2017.
Lévy-Leboyer, M. and Bourguignon, F. (1985). L’économie française au XIXe siècle: Analyse macro-économique. Paris: Éditions Économica.
Lhomme, J. (1970). La crise agricole à la fin du XIXe siècle en France: Essai d’interprétation économique et sociale. Revue Économique 21(4): 521‒553.
Marchand, O. and Thélot, C. (1997). Le travail en France, 1800–2000. Paris: Nathan.
Motte, C. and Pelissier, J.-P. (1992). La binette, l’aiguille et le plumeau: Les mondes du travail féminin. In: Dupâquier, J. and Kessler, D. (eds.). La société française au XIXe siècle. Paris: Fayard: 237‒342.
Rollet, C. (1978). Allaitement, mise en nourrice et mortalité infantile en France à la fin du XIXe siècle. Population (French edition) ^33(6): 1189‒1203.
Rollet, C. (1982). Nourrices et nourrissons dans le département de la Seine et en France de 1880 à 1940. Population (French edition) 37(3): 573‒604.
Schweitzer, S. (2002). Les femmes ont toujours travaillé: Une histoire du travail des femmes aux XIXe et XXe siècles. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Sharlin, A. (1986). Urban‒rural differences in fertility in Europe during the demographic transition. In: Coale, A.J. and Watkins, S.C. (eds.). The decline of fertility in Europe: The revised proceedings of a conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 234‒260.
Statistiska Centralbyrån (1969). Historisk statistik för Sverige: Del 1: Befolkning, 2nd edition, 1720‒1967. Stockholm: Statistiska Centralbyrån.
United Nations (2015). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
Van de Walle, E. (1998). Piercing the fogs of time: Europe’s early population history. A review essay. Population and Development Review 24(1): 149‒157.
Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. The Geographical Review 61(2): 219‒249.