Volume 39 - Article 15 | Pages 431–458  

Joint lifestyles and the risk of union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation

By Kirsten van Houdt, Anne-Rigt Poortman

References

Amato, P.R. and James, S. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science 1(1): 2–13.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography 29(3): 357–374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, J., Haynes, M., and Hewitt, B. (2010). Pathways into marriage: Cohabitation and the domestic division of labor. Journal of Family Issues 31: 1507–1529.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S., Landes, E.M., and Michael, R.T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. The Journal of Political Economy 85(6): 1141–1187.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Booth, A., Johnson, D.R., White, L., and Edwards, J.N. (1984). Women, outside employment, and marital instability. American Journal of Sociology 90(3): 567–583.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brines, J. and Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review 64(3): 333–355.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S., Manning, W.D., and Payne, K.K. (2015). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues 38(12): 1730–1753.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L. and Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(3): 668–678.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R.M., and Waite, L.J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces 74(2): 609–632.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N., Greenstein, T.N., and Marks, J.P.G. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues 28(9): 1246–1272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Mulder, C.H. (2005). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships: Wave 1. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NKPS Working Paper 4).

Download reference:

Dykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Mulder, C.H. (2012). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships: Wave 2. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NKPS Working Paper 8).

Download reference:

Efron, B. (1977). The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72(557565).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gager, C.T. and Sanchez, L. (2003). Two as one? Couples’ perceptions of time spent together, marital quality, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues 24(1): 21–50.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Goodwin, P.Y., Mosher, W.D., and Chandra, A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics Series 23, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth 28: 1–45.

Download reference:

Guo, G. (1993). Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. Sociological Methodology 23(1): 217–243.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hamplová, D., Le Bourdais, C., and Lapierre‐Adamcyk, É. (2014). Is the cohabitation-marriage gap in money pooling universal? Journal of Marriage and Family 76(5): 983–997.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. (2014). The different meanings of cohabitation across Europe: How cohabiters view their unions and differ in their plans and behaviors. [PhD thesis]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Keizer, R. (2015). Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage. Demographic Research 32(10): 311–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A.R. (2014). Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective. Demographic Research 30(55): 1527–1560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hill, M.S. (1988). Marital stability and spouses’ shared time: A multidisciplinary hypothesis. Journal of Family Issues 9(4): 427–451.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hogerbrugge, M.J.A., de Hoon, S., Dykstra, P.A., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Mulder, C.H. (2014). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships: Wave 4. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NKPS Working Paper 13).

Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and Bernasco, W. (2001). Joint and separated lifestyles in couple relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(3): 639–654.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M., Loeve, A., and Manting, D. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography 44(1): 159–179.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and van Groenou, M.B. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22(4): 455–476.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kline Rhoades, G., Stanley, S.M., and Markman, H.J. (2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology 20(4): 553–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. and Boyle, P. (2010). Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the ‘Trial marriage’ theory? Demographic Research 23(31): 879–904.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T. (2012). Childbearing among cohabiting women: Race, pregnancy, and union transitions. In: Booth, A., Brown, S.L., Landale, N.S., Manning, W.D., and McHale, S.M. (eds.). Early adulthood in a family context. New York: Springer: 209–220.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12(1): 53–65.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Matysiak, A., Styrc, M., and Vignoli, D. (2014). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies 68(2): 197–215.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Merz, E., Dykstra, P.A., Hogerbrugge, M.J.A., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Mulder, C.H. (2012). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships: Wave 3. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.

Download reference:

Poortman, A. (2005). How work affects divorce: The mediating role of financial and time pressures. Journal of Family Issues 26(2): 168–195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.R. and Kalmijn, M. (2002). Women’s labour market position and divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating economic interpretations of the work effect. European Journal of Population 18(2): 175–202.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.R. and Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(2): 357–376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Presser, H.B. (2000). Nonstandard work schedules and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(1): 93–110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rözer, J.J., Mollenhorst, G., and Völker, B. (2015). Romantic relationship formation, maintenance and changes in personal networks. Advances in Life Course Research 23: 86–97.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoenfeld, D. (1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 69(1): 239–241.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Solomon, S.E., Rothblum, E.D., and Balsam, K.F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles 52(9–10): 561–575.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J. and Lloyd, K.M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review 24(6): 21–35.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J., Trent, K., and Shen, Y. (2001). Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural‐opportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(3): 743–754.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spitze, G. and South, S.J. (1985). Women’s employment, time expenditure, and divorce. Journal of Family Issues 6(3): 307–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Netherlands (2011). Niet-gehuwd samenwonen in de Europese Unie. In: Bevolkingstrends, 2e kwartaal 2011. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek: 9.

Download reference:

Terling-Watt, T. (2001). Explaining divorce: An examination of the relationship between marital characteristics and divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 35(3–4): 125–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. and Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and Family 54(2): 259–267.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Voorpostel, M., van der Lippe, T., and Gershuny, J. (2009). Trends in free time with a partner: A transformation of intimacy? Social Indicators Research 93(1): 165–169.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Waite, L. and Gallagher, M. (2002). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York: Broadway Books.

Download reference:

Yucel, D. (2012). Wives’ work hours and marital dissolution: Differential effects across marital duration. Sociology Mind 2(1): 12–22.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article