Volume 39 - Article 3 | Pages 61–94  

Prospective versus retrospective measurement of unwanted fertility: Strengths, weaknesses, and inconsistencies assessed for a cohort of US women

By Heather Rackin, S. Philip Morgan

References

Bachrach, C.A. and Morgan, S.P. (2013). A cognitive–social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review 39(3): 459–485.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bankole, A. and Westoff, C.F. (1998). The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Biosocial Science 30(4): 439–445.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S. and East, P.L. (2011). Children’s experiences after the unintended birth of a sibling. Demography 48(1): 101–125.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1990). The measurement of wanted fertility. Population and Development Review 16(3): 487–506.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.S. and Eisenberg, L. (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Download reference:

Casterline, J.B. and El-Zeini, L.O. (2007). The estimation of unwanted fertility. Demography 44(4): 729–745.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S.R. (2014). Revisiting retrospective reporting of first-birth intendedness. Maternal and Child Health Journal 18(1): 2141–2147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Joyce, T., Kaestner, R., and Korenman, S. (2002). On the validity of retrospective assessments of pregnancy intention. Demography 39(1): 199–213.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klerman, L.V. (2000). The intendedness of pregnancy: A concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3): 155–162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koenig, M.A., Acharya, R., Singh, S., and Roy, T.K. (2006). Do current measurement approaches underestimate levels of unwanted childbearing? Evidence from rural India. Population Studies 60(3): 243–256.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Logan, C., Holcombe, E., Manlove, J., and Ryan, S. (2007). The consequences of unintended childbearing. Child Trends and National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy 28: 142–151.

Download reference:

Machiyama, K., Baschieri, A., Dube, A., Crampin, A.C., Glynn, J.R., French, N., and Cleland, J. (2015). An assessment of childbearing preferences in northern Malawi. Studies in Family Planning 46(2): 161–176.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. (2001). Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts. In: Proceedings of US Census Bureau Conference ‘The direction of fertility in the United States’. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau.

Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Beaujouan, É. (2011). Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 99–129.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rackin, H.M. and Bachrach, C. (2016). Assessing the predictive value of fertility expectations through a cognitive–social model. Population Research and Policy Review 35(4): 527–551.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rackin, H.M. and Brasher, M.S. (2016). Is baby a blessing? Wantedness, age at first birth, and later-life depression. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(5): 1269–1284.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. and Westoff, C.F. (1965). Reproduction in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press .

Download reference:

Smith-Greenaway, E. and Sennott, C. (2016). Death and desirability: Retrospective reporting of unintended pregnancy after a child’s death. Demography 53(3): 805–834.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. and Ryder, N.B. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography 14(4): 431–453.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Williams, L. and Abma, J. (2000). Birth wantedness reports: A look forward and a look back. Biodemography and Social Biology 47(3–4): 147–163.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yeatman, S. and Sennott, C. (2015). The sensitivity of measures of unwanted and unintended pregnancy using retrospective and prospective reporting: Evidence from Malawi. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19(7): 1593–1600.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article