Volume 39 - Article 39 | Pages 1039–1064  

Housework division and gender ideology: When do attitudes really matter?

By Renzo Carriero, Lorenzo Todesco

References

Aassve, A., Fuochi, G., and Mencarini, L. (2014). Desperate housework: Relative resources, time availability, economic dependency, and gender ideology across Europe. Journal of Family Issues 35(8): 1000–1022.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., and Zanna, M.P. (eds.). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 173–221.

Download reference:

Artis, J.E. and Pavalko, E.K. (2003). Explaining the decline in women’s household labor: Individual change and cohort differences. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(3): 746–761.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berk, S.E. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S.M., Lesnard, L., Nazio, T., and Raley, S. (2014). Gender and time allocation of cohabiting and married women and men in France, Italy, and the United States. Demographic Research: Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective 31(8): 183–216.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.A., Sayer, L.C., and Robinson, J.P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79(1): 191–228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blood, R.O. and Wolfe, D.O. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.

Download reference:

Bobo, L. and Licari, F.C. (1989). Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly 53(3): 285–308.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Boudon, R. (1995). Le juste et le vrai: Essais sur l’objectivité des valeurs et de la connaissance. Paris: Fayard/Seuil.

Download reference:

Braun, M. (2008). Using egalitarian items to measure men’s and women’s family roles. Sex Roles 59(9–10): 644–656.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society 5(3): 302–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Weiss, Y. (2014). Economics of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Bühlmann, F., Elcheroth, G., and Tettamanti, M. (2010). The division of labour among European couples: The effects of life course and welfare policy on value–practice configurations. European Sociological Review 26(1): 49–66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.

Download reference:

Carriero, R. and Todesco, L. (2016). Indaffarate e soddisfatte: Donne, uomini e lavoro familiare in Italia. Rome: Carocci.

Download reference:

Carriero, R. and Todesco, L. (2017). The interplay between equity and gender ideology in perceived housework fairness: Evidence from an experimental vignette design. Sociological Inquiry 87(4): 561–585.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chesters, J. (2012). Gender attitudes and housework: Trends over time in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 43(4): 511–526.

Download reference:

Chesters, J. (2011). Gender convergence in core housework hours: Assessing the relevance of earlier approaches for explaining current trends. Journal of Sociology 49(1): 78–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cobalti, A. and Schizzerotto, A. (1994). La mobilità sociale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4): 1208–1233.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Constantin, A. and Voicu, M. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cross-cultural surveys: Content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Research 123(3): 733–751.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter, D.E. (ed.). Ideology and discontent. Glencoe: Free Press: 206–261.

Download reference:

Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., and Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment and Society 19(2): 213–233.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues 26(8): 1037–1061.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cunningham, M., Beutel, A.M., Barber, J.S., and Thornton, A. (2005). Reciprocal relationships between attitudes about gender and social contexts during young adulthood. Social Science Research 34(4): 862–892.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N. (2006). Gender ideology construction from adolescence to young adulthood. Social Science Research 36(3): 1021–1041.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N. and Greenstein, T.N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. 35: 87–105. doi:. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 87–105.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N., Greenstein, T.N., and Gerteisen Marks, J.P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues 28(9): 1246–1272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Desjardins, R. and Schuller, T. (2006). Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement. Paris: OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.

Download reference:

Domínguez-Folgueras, M. (2013). Is cohabitation more egalitarian? The division of household labor in five European countries. Journal of Family Issues 34(12): 1623–1646.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Erickson, R.J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(2): 337–351.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford.

Download reference:

European Institute for Gender Equality (2015). Gender equality index 2015: Measuring gender equality in the European union 2005–2012. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.

Download reference:

Evertsson, M. and Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1272–1286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fahlén, S. (2016). Equality at home: A question of career? Housework, norms, and policies in a European comparative perspective. Demographic Research: Special Collection on Finding Work–Life Balance 35(48): 1411–1440.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fan, P.L. and Mooney Marini, M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research 29(2): 258–283.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ferree, M.M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(4): 866–884.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69(6): 751–767.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gash, V. (2008). Preference or constraint? Part-time workers’ transitions in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom. Work, Employment and Society 22(4): 655–674.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gough, M. and Killewald, A. (2010). Gender, job loss, and housework: The time availability hypothesis revisited. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (PSC Research Report No. 10-710).

Download reference:

Gough, M. and Killewald, A. (2011). Unemployment in families: The case of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 73(5): 1085–1100.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greenstein, T.N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(3): 585–595.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grunow, D. and Baur, N. (2014). The association between norms and actions. The case of men’s participation in housework. Comparative Population Studies 39(3): 521–558.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Horne, R.M., Johnson, M.D., Galambos, N.L., and Krahn, H.J. (2017). Time, money, or gender? Predictors of the division of household labour across life stages. Sex Roles 78(11–12): 731–743.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huber, J. and Spitze, G. (1983). Sex stratification: Children, housework, and jobs. New York: Academic Press.

Download reference:

Jackson, S. and Scott, S. (2002). Gender: A sociological reader. London: Routledge.

Download reference:

Jacobs, J.A. and Gerson, K. (2016). Unpacking Americans’ views of the employment of mothers and fathers using national vignette survey data. Gender and Society 30(3): 413–441.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jenkins, S.P. and O’Leary, N.C. (1995). Modelling domestic work time. Journal of Population Economics 8(3): 265–279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalleberg, A.L. and Rosenfeld, R.A. (1990). Work in the family and in the labor market: A cross-national, reciprocal analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family 52(2): 331–346.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kan, M.Y. (2008). Measuring housework participation: The gap between ‘stylised’ questionnaire estimates and diary-based estimates. Social Indicators Research 86(3): 381–400.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kane, E.W. (1995). Education and beliefs about gender inequality. Social Problems 42(1): 74–90.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kerber, L.K. (1899). Separate spheres, female worlds, woman’s place: The rhetoric of women’s history. The Journal of American History 75(1): 9–39.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kerckhoff, A.C., Raudenbush, S.W., and Glennie, E. (2001). Education, cognitive skill, and labor force outcomes. Sociology of Education 74(1): 1–24.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Knight, C.R. and Brinton, M.C. (2017). One egalitarianism or several? Two decades of gender-role attitude change in Europe. American Journal of Sociology 122(5): 1485–1532.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Knudsen, K. and Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review 24(1): 97–113.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lachance-Grzela, M. and Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles 63(11–12): 767–780.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lipset, S.M. (1960). Political man. London: Heinemann.

Download reference:

Lomazzi, V. (2017). Testing the goodness of the EVS gender role attitudes scale. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology 135(1): 1–11.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, G.W. (1977). Family power: Reflection and direction. Pacific Sociological Review 20(4): 607–621.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ohlander, J., Batalova, J., and Treas, J. (2005). Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations. Social Science Research 34(4): 781–799.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Parkman, A.M. (2004). Bargaining over housework: The frustrating situation of secondary wage earners. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63(4): 765–794.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Petty, R.E. and Krosnick, J.A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download reference:

Poortman, A. and Van Der Lippe, T. (2009). Attitudes toward housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 526–541.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Procher, V., Ritter, N., and Vance, C. (2017). Housework allocation in Germany: The role of income and gender identity. Social Science Quarterly 99(1): 43–61.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ross, C. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces 65(3): 816–833.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schober, P. and Scott, J. (2012). Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: Dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood. Work, Employment and Society 26(3): 514–530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stier, H. and Lewin-Epstein, N. (2007). Policy effects on the division of housework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 9(3): 235–259.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sullivan, O. and Gershuny, J. (2016). Change in spousal human capital and housework: A longitudinal analysis. European Sociological Review 32(6): 864–880.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Todesco, L. (2015). ‘Money talks’ or ‘gender trumps money’? Explaining the division of unpaid family work among dual earner parents in an Italian metropolitan area. Marriage and Family Review 51(1): 59–97.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Todesco, L. (2013). Quello che gli uomini non fanno. Il lavoro familiare nelle società contemporanee. Rome: Carocci.

Download reference:

Treas, J. and Tai, T. (2016). Gender inequality in housework across 20 European nations: Lessons from gender stratification theories. Sex Roles 74(11): 495–511.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tsuya, N.O., Bumpass, L.L., Choe, M.K., and Rindfuss, R.R. (2012). Employment and household tasks of Japanese couples, 1994–2009. Demographic Research 27(24): 705–718.

Weblink:
Download reference:

West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125–151.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article