Volume 39 - Article 45 | Pages 1227–1240  

Does age-adjusted measurement of contraceptive use better explain the relationship between fertility and contraception?

By Yoonjoung Choi, Madeleine Short Fabic, Jacob Adetunji

References

Bertrand, J.T., Sullivan, T.M., Knowles, E.A., Zeeshan, M.F., and Shelton, J.D. (2014). Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(3): 144–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2015). Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up. Demographic Research 33(19): 535–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1982). The fertility-inhibiting effects of the intermediate fertility variables. Studies in Family Planning 13(6/7): 179–189.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Casterline, J. (2013). Fertility transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? Population and Development Review 38(S1): 153–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

CESDEM and ICF International (2014). Republica Dominicana encuesta demografica y de salud 2013. Santo Domingo: Centro de Estudios Sociales y Demograficos and ICF International.

Download reference:

Majumder, N. and Ram, F. (2015). Explaining the role of proximate determinants on fertility decline among poor and non-poor in Asian countries. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0115441.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mauldin, W.P. and Segal, S.J. (1988). Prevalence of contraceptive use: Trends and issues. Studies in Family Planning 19(6 Pt 1): 335–353.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ministry of Health and Population, El-Zanaty, F. and Associates, and ICF International (2015). Egypt demographic and health survey 2014. Cairo: Ministry of Health and Population and ICF International.

Download reference:

Rogers, E. and Stephenson, R. (2017). Examining temporal shifts in the proximate determinants of fertility in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 50(4): 551–568.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ross, J. and Frankenberg, E. (1993). Findings from two decades of family planning research. New York: Population Council.

Download reference:

Ross, J., Keesbury, J., and Hardee, K. (2015). Trends in the contraceptive method mix in low- and middle-income countries: Analysis using a new ‘average deviation’ measure. Global Health: Science and Practice 3(1): 34–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rutstein, S.O. and Rojas, G. (2006). Guide to DHS statistics. Calverton: DHS Program.

Download reference:

Saha, U.R. and Bairagi, R. (2007). Inconsistencies in the relationship between contraceptive use and fertility in Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives 33(1): 31–37.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stover, J. (1998). Revising the proximate determinants of fertility framework: What have we learned in the past 20 years? Studies in Family Planning 29(3): 255–267.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stover, J. and Winfrey, W. (2017). The effects of family planning and other factors on fertility, abortion, miscarriage, and stillbirths in the spectrum model. BMC Public Health 17(S4): 775.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tsui, A.O. (2001). Population policies, family planning programs, and fertility: The record. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition).

Download reference:

Zheng, X., Tan, L., Ren, Q., Cui, Z., Wu, J., Lin, T., He, J., and Chen, H. (2012). Trends in contraceptive patterns and behaviors during a period of fertility transition in China: 1988–2006. Contraception 86(3): 204–213.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article