Volume 40 - Article 20 | Pages 533–560
Who leaves, who stays? Gendered routes out of the family home following union dissolution in Italy
References
Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., and Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A: Statistics in Society 170(3): 781–799.
Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Allen, J., Barlow, J., Leal, J., Maloutas, T., and Padovani, L. (2004). Housing and welfare in southern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Andress, H.-J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., and Hummelsheim, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution: A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden. European Sociological Review 22(5): 533–560.
Barbagli, M. and Saraceno, C. (1998). Separarsi in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Beaujouan, E. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research 17(2): 69–80.
Beer, A. and Faulkner, D. (2011). Housing transitions through the life course: Aspirations, needs and policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Brewer, M. and Nandi, A. (2014). Partnership dissolution: How does it affect income, employment and well-being? Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER Working Paper Series 2014-30).
Brilli, Y., Del Boca, D., and Pronzato, C. (2014). Does child care availability play a role in maternal employment and children’s development? Evidence from Italy. Review of Economics of the Household 14(1): 27–51.
Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., and Castro Martín, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 52(3): 747–756.
Caruso, N. (2017). Policies and practices in Italian welfare housing. Basel: Springer International.
Casterline, J.B., Williams, L., and McDonald, P. (1986). The age difference between spouses: Variations among developing countries. Population Studies 40(3): 353–374.
Clark, W.A.V. and Onaka, J.L. (1983). Life cycle and housing adjustments as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Studies 20(1): 47–57.
Coulter, R., van Ham, M., and Findlay, A.M. (2016). Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space. Progress in Human Geography 40(3): 352–374.
Das, M., de Valk, H., and Merz, E.M. (2017). Mothers’ mobility after separation: Do grandmothers matter? Population, Space and Place 23(2): 1–14.
De Blasio, G. and Vuri, D. (2013). Joint custody in the Italian courts. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA Discussion Paper 7472).
De Rose, A. and Marquette, C. (2011). Same-sex families in Italy compared to Spain. Journal of Family Research 7: 53–69.
Del Boca, D. and Sauer, R.M. (2009). Life cycle employment and fertility across institutional environments. European Economic Review 53(3): 274–292.
Dewilde, C. (2008). Divorce and the housing movements of owner-occupiers: A European comparison. Housing Studies 23(6): 809–832.
Dieleman, F.M., Clark, W.A.V., and Deurloo, M.C. (1995). Falling out of the home owner market. Housing Studies 10(1): 3–15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eurostat (2003, July 3). Regulation (EC) no. 1177/2003 of the European parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). Official Journal of the European Union .
Feijten, P. and Mulder, C.H. (2005). Life-course experience and housing quality. Housing Studies 20(4): 571–587.
Feijten, P. and van Ham, M. (2007). Residential mobility and migration of the separated. Demographic Research 17(21): 623–654.
Feijten, P. and van Ham, M. (2010). The impact of splitting up and divorce on housing careers in the UK. Housing Studies 25(4): 483–507.
Ferrera, M. (2000). Reconstructing the welfare state in Southern Europe. In: Kuhnle, S. (ed.). Survival of the welfare state. London: Routledge: 166–181.
Findlay, A.M., McCollum, D., Coulter, R., and Gayle, V. (2015). New mobilities across the life course: A framework for analysing demographically linked drivers of migration. Population, Space and Place 21(4): 309–402.
Gabrielli, G. and Hoem, J. (2010). Italy’s non-negligible cohabitational unions. European Journal of Population 26(1): 33–46.
Geist, C. and McManus, P.A. (2008). Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications. Population, Space and Place 14(4): 283–303.
Gram-Hanssen, K. and Bech-Danielsen, C. (2008). Home dissolution: What happens after separation? Housing Studies 23(3): 507–522.
Gustafson, P. and Fransson, U. (2015). Age differences between spouses: Sociodemographic variation and selection. Marriage and Family Review 51(7): 610–632.
Helderman, A.C. (2007). Once a home owner, always a home owner? An analysis of moves out of owner-occupation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 22(3): 239–261.
Hofferth, S.L. and Iceland, J. (1998). Social capital in rural and urban communities. Rural Sociology 63(4): 574–598.
Iacovou, M. and Lynn, P. (2013). Implications of the EU-SILC following rules, and their implementation, for longitudinal analysis. Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER Working Paper Series 2013-17).
Istat (2015b). Come cambia la vita delle donne. Roma: Istat.
Istat (2011). Come cambiano le forme familiari [electronic resource]. Roma: Istat.
Istat (2016a). Matrimoni, separazioni e divorzi: Anno 2015. Roma: Istat (Stastistiche report).
Istat (2007). Nota informativa sull’utilizzo dei file relativi alla componente longitudinale di EU-SILC. Roma: Istat.
Istat (2016b). Rapporto annual: La situazione del paese: Anno 2015. Roma: Istat.
Istat (2015a). Rapporto annuale: La situazione del paese: Anno 2014. Roma: Istat.
Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population 29(4): 417–444.
Lersch, P.M. and Vidal, S. (2014). Falling out of love and down the housing ladder: A longitudinal analysis of marital separation and home ownership. European Sociological Review 30(4): 512–524.
Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In: Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J. (eds.). Bevolking: Groei en krimp. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus: 9–24.
McCarthy, P. and Simpson, B. (1991). Issues in post-divorce housing: Family policy or housing policy? Avebury: Aldershot.
Mikolai, J. and Kulu, H. (2018b). Divorce, separation and housing changes: A multiprocess analysis of longitudinal data from England and Wales. Demography 55(1): 83–106.
Mikolai, J. and Kulu, H. (2018a). Short- and long-term effects of divorce and separation on housing tenure in England and Wales. Population Studies 72(1): 17–39.
Mitchell, C. (2010). Are divorce studies trustworthy? The effects of survey non-response and response errors. Journal of Marriage and the Family 72(4): 893–905.
Mulder, C.H. and Billari, F.C. (2010). Homeownership regimes and low fertility. Housing Studies 25(4): 527–541.
Mulder, C.H. and Malmberg, G. (2011). Moving related to separation: Who moves and to what distance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 43(11): 2589–2607.
Mulder, C.H., ten Hengel, B., Latten, J., and Das, M. (2012). Relative resources and moving from the joint home around divorce. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 27(2): 153–163.
Mulder, C.H. and Wagner, M. (2012). Moving after separation: The role of location-specific capital. Housing Studies 27(6): 839–852.
Mulder, C.H. and Wagner, M. (2010). Union dissolution and mobility: Who moves from the family home after separation? Journal of Marriage and the Family 72(5): 1263–1273.
Ongaro, F., Mazzuco, S., and Meggiolaro, S. (2009). Economic consequences of union dissolution in Italy: Findings form the European Community Household Panel. European Journal of Population 25(1): 45–65.
Pittini, A., Ghekière, L., Dijol, J., and Kiss, I. (2015). The state of housing in the EU 2015: A housing Europe review. Brussels: Housing Europe.
Poggio, T. (2012). The housing pillar of the Mediterranean welfare regime: Relations between home ownership and other dimensions of welfare in Italy. In: Ronald, R. and Elsinga, M. (eds.). Beyond home ownership: Housing, welfare and society. London: Routledge: 51–67.
Presser, H.B. (1975). Age differences between spouses. American Behavioral Scientist 19(2): 190–205.
Reher, D. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234.
Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research 11(6): 149–172.
Rossi, A.S. and Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Rossi, P.H. (1955). Why families move. Glencoe: Free Press.
Sabbadini, L.L. (2017, May 11). Divorzio, la cassazione certifica una parità che non c’è. La Stampa .
Saraceno, C. (1994). The ambivalent familism of the Italian welfare states. Social Politics 1(1): 60–82.
Stone, J., Berrington, A., and Falkingham, J. (2014). Gender, turning points, and boomerangs: Returning home in young adulthood in Great Britain. Demography 51(1): 257–276.
Sullivan, O. (1986Housing movements of the divorced and separated). Housing Studies. 1 1(35–48).
Symon, P. (1990). Marital breakdown, gender and home ownership: The owner-occupied home in separation and divorce. In: Symon, P. (ed.). Housing and divorce. Glasgow: Centre for Housing Research: 110–138.
Thomas, M.J., Mulder, C.H., and Cooke, T.J. (2017). Linked lives and constrained spatial mobility: The case of moves related to separation among families with children. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42(4): 597–611.
Tosi, A. (2007). Case, quartieri, abitanti, politiche. Milano: Libreria Clup.
Uunk, W. (2004). The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: The impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population 20(3): 251–285.
Wasoff, F. and Dobash, R. (1990). Moving the family: Changing housing circumstances after divorce. In: Symon, P. (ed.). Housing and Divorce. Glasgow: Centre for Housing Research: 139–165.