Volume 43 - Article 15 | Pages 401–430  

Trends in living arrangements and their impact on the mortality of older adults: Belgium 1991‒2012

By Michel Poulain, Luc Dal, Anne Herm

References

Antonucci, T.C. and Ajrouch, K.J. (2007). Social resources. In: Mollenkopf, H. and Walker, A. (eds.). Quality of life in old age: International and multidisciplinary perspectives (Social Indicators Research Series 31). Dordrecht: Springer: 49–64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Audenaert, V. (2003). Changes in older people’s living arrangements in Flanders, 1993–98. Ageing and Society 23(4): 451–469.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caselli, G., Vallin, J., and Wunsch, G. (eds.) (2006). Demography: Analysis and synthesis, a treatise in population, vol 2, section 1: Determinants of mortality. London: Academic Press.

Download reference:

Chappell, N.L. (1991). Living arrangements and sources of caregiving. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 46(1): S1–8.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, M.A., Moritz, D.J., Neuhaus, J.M., Barclay, J.D., and Gee, L. (1997). Living arrangement, changes in living arrangement and survival among community dwelling older adults. American Journal of Public Health 87(3): 371–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, M.A., Neuhaus, J.M., Moritz, D.J., and Segal, M.R. (1992). Living arrangements and survival among middle-aged and older adults in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. American Journal of Public Health 82(3): 401–406.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: Partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(1): 236–243.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Jong Gierveld, J. (2001). Unity and diversity in the living arrangements of older adults in different regions of Europe. EURAMERICA 31(3): 461–517.

Download reference:

Drefahl, S. (2012). Do the married really live longer? The role of cohabitation and socioeconomic status. Journal of Marriage and Family 74: 1–14.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Drefahl, S. (2010). The mortality of the married and cohabiting in Denmark – The role of socioeconomic status. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 8.

Download reference:

Evans, C.J., Ho, Y., Daveson, B.A., Hall, S., Higginson, I.J., and Gao, W. (2014). Place and cause of death in centenarians: A population-based observational study in England, 2001 to 2010. PLoS Med 11(6): e1001653.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Feng, Z., Falkingham, J., Liu, X., and Vlachantoni, A. (2017). Changes in living arrangements and mortality among older people in China. SSM ‒ Population Health 3: 9–19.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fokkema, T. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? Demographic Research 19(36): 1351–1418.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Franke, S. and Kulu, H. (2017). Mortality differences by partnership status in England and Wales: The effect of living arrangements or health selection? European Journal of Population 34: 87–118.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Freedman, V.A., Cornman, J.C., and Carr, D. (2014). Is spousal caregiving associated with enhanced well-being? New evidence from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 69(6): 861–869.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gaymu, J., Festy, P., Poulain, M., and Beets, G. (eds.) (2008). Future elderly living conditions in Europe. L’avenir des conditions de vie des Européens âgés. Paris: INED (Les cahiers de l’INED).

Download reference:

Grundy, E. (2011). Household transition and subsequent mortality among older people in England and Wales: Trends over three decades. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65(4): 353–359.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grundy, E. (2008). The challenges of aging: Prospects for the family support of older people in 21st century Europe. In: Surkyn, J., Deboosere, P., and Van Bavel, J. (eds.). Demographic challenges for the 21st century. A state of the art in demography. Brussels: VUPRESS: 223–246.

Download reference:

Herm, A., Anson, J., and Poulain, M. (2016). Living arrangements and marital status: A register-based study of survival of older adults in Belgium at the beginning of the 21st century. Ageing and Society 36(10): 2141−2162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Herm, A., Poulain, M., and Anson, J. (2014). Excess mortality risks in institutions: The influence of health and disability status. In: Anson, J. and Luy, M. (eds.). Mortality in an international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer: 245–263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Houttekier, D., Cohen, J., Surkyn, J., and Deliens, L. (2011). Study of recent and future trends in place of death in Belgium using death certificate data: A shift from hospitals to care homes. BMC Public Health 11: 228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and Saraceno, C. (2008). A comparative perspective on intergenerational support: Responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familialistic countries. European Societies 10(3): 479–508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalseth, J. and Theisen, O.M. (2017). Trends in place of death: The role of demographic and epidemiological shifts in end-of-life care policy. Palliative Medicine 31(10): 964–974.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Keilman, N. and Christiansen, S. (2010). Norwegian elderly less likely to live alone in future. European Journal of Population 26: 47–72.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koskinen, S., Joutsenniemi, K., Martelin, T., and Martikainen, P. (2007). Mortality differences according to living arrangements. International Journal of Epidemiology 36(6): 1255–1264.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe. Population and Development Review 9(3): 411–435.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. PNAS 111(51): 18112‒18115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lodewijckx, E. and Deboosere, P. (2011). Households and families: stability and fast development go hand in hand. GGP Belgium Paper Series 6.

Download reference:

Martikainen, P., Martelin, T., Nihtilä, E., Majamaa, K., and Koskinen, S. (2005). Differences in mortality by marital status in Finland from 1976 to 2000: Analyses of changes in marital status distributions, socio-demographic and household composition, and cause of death. Population Studies 59(1): 99–115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Martikainen, P., Murphy, M., Moustgaard, H., and Mikkonen, J. (2019). Living arrangements of older persons in 1987–2035 in Finland: Trends by age, sex and educational attainment. Ageing and Society 39(2): 358–380.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McGarry, K. and Schoeni, R.F. (2000). Social security, economic growth, and the rise in elderly widows’ independence in the twentieth century. Demography 37(2): 221–236.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M., Grundy, E., and Kalogirou, S. (2007). The increase in marital status differences in mortality up to the oldest age in seven European countries, 1990‒99. Population Studies 61(3): 287–298.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pezzin, L.E., Pollak, R.A., and Schone, B.S. (2013). Complex families and late-life outcomes among elderly persons: Disability, institutionalization, and longevity. Journal of Marriage and Family 75: 1084–1097.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poulain, M., Dal, L., and Herm, A. (2016). Mortality risk by living arrangement for the elderly Belgian population. Revue Quetelet/ Quetelet Journal 4(1): 29–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poulain, M. and Herm, A. (2015). Centenarians’ marital history and living arrangements: Pathways to extreme longevity. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 71B(4): 724–733.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rau, R., Soroko, E., Jasilionis, D., and Vaupel, J.W. (2008). Continued reductions in mortality at advanced ages. Population and Development Review 34(4): 747–768.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reher, D. and Requena, M. (2018). Living alone in later life: A global perspective. Population and Development Review 44(3): 427–454.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sánchez Gassen, N. and Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of union status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy 25(4): 431–449.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.H. and Yahirun, J.J. (2014). Diversity in old age: The elderly in changing economic and family contexts. In: Logan, J. (ed.). Diversity and disparities: America enters a new century. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation: 270–305.

Download reference:

Staehelin, K., Schindler, C., Spoerri, A., and Zemp Stutz, E. (2012). Marital status, living arrangement and mortality: Does the association vary by gender? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 66(7): e22.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tumin, D. (2018). Does marriage protect health? A birth cohort comparison. Social Science Quarterly 99(2): 626–643.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations (2017). Living arrangements of older persons: a report on an expanded international dataset. New York: United Nations, ST/ESA/SER.A/407.

Download reference:

Valkonen, T., Martikainen, P., and Blomgren, J. (2004). Increasing excess mortality among non-married elderly people in developed countries. Demographic Research Special Collection 2(12): 303–330.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van den Bosch, K., Willemé, P., Geerts, J., Breda, J., Peeters, S., Van De Sande, S., Vrijens, F., Van de Voorde, C., and Stordeur, S. (2011). Soins résidentiels pour les personnes âgées en Belgique: Projections 2011–2025. Brussels: Centre fédéral d’expertise des soins de santé (KCE), KCE Reports 167B.

Download reference:

Vaupel, J.W., Manton, K.G., and Stallard, E. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16(3): 439–454.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wagner, M. and Valdés Cifuentes, I. (2014). The pluralisation of living arrangements – a continuous trend? Comparative Population Studies 39(1): 99–122.

Download reference:

Back to the article