Volume 43 - Article 16 | Pages 431–460  

Oh half-brother, where art thou? The boundaries of full- and half-sibling interaction

By Linus Andersson

References

Ahrons, C.R. (2007). Family ties after divorce: Long-term implications for children. Family Process 46(1): 53–65.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, E.R. (1999). Sibling, half sibling, and stepsibling relationships in remarried families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development : 101–126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS Countries. Demographic Research 1(7): 343‒364.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aughinbaugh, A. (2004). The impact of attrition on the children of the NLSY79. Journal of Human Resources 39(2): 536–563.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bäck-Wiklund, M. and Johansson, T. (2012). Nätverksfamiljen. Stockholm : Natur & Kultur.

Download reference:

Björnberg, U. (2001). Cohabitation and marriage in Sweden: Does family form matter? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(3): 350–362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bloome, D. (2017). Childhood family structure and intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Demography 54(2): 541–569.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L. and Manning, W.D. (2009). Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: The significance of cohabitation. Demography 46(1): 85–101.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cancian, M. and Meyer, D.R. (2006). Alternative approaches to child support policy in the context of multiple-partner fertility. Report to the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development.

Download reference:

Cancian, M., Meyer, D.R., and Cook, S.T. (2011). The evolution of family complexity from the perspective of nonmarital children. Demography 48(3): 957–982.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlson, M.J. and Furstenberg, F.F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban US parents. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(3): 718–732.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chapais, B. (2009). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology 84(3): 634–650.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Danielsbacka, M. and Tanskanen, A.O. (2015). The association between unequal parental treatment and the sibling relationship in Finland: The difference between full and half-siblings. Evolutionary Psychology 13(2).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A.O., and Rotkirch, A. (2015). Impact of genetic relatedness and emotional closeness on intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(4): 889–907.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dorius, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing family instability to include measures of childbearing: The practical value of assessing multiple partner fertility. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting for the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, March 31‒April, 2. .

Download reference:

Ganong, L.H. and Coleman, M. (1988). Do mutual children cement bonds in stepfamilies? Journal of Marriage and the Family 3(50): 687–698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goetting, A. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and Family 48(4): 703–714.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Furstenberg, F.F. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography 44(3): 583–601.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hadfield, K. and Nixon, E. (2013). Including those that exclude themselves: Comparisons of self-identifying and non-self-identifying stepfamilies. Journal of Family Studies 19(2): 207–216.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 17–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Henz, U. and Thomson, E. (2005). Union stability and stepfamily fertility in Austria, Finland, France, and West Germany. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 21(1): 3–29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J.A. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies 65(1): 115–128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., and Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. ZfF–Zeitschrift Für Familienforschung/ Journal of Family Research 23(1): 77–101.

Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Andersson, G. (2018). Disparities in children’s family experiences by mother’s socioeconomic status: The case of Finland. Population Research and Policy Review 37(5): 751–768.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jonsson, J.O. and Gähler, M. (1997). Family dissolution, family reconstitution, and children’s educational careers: Recent evidence for Sweden. Demography 34(2): 277–293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Juby, H. and Le Bourdais, C. (1999). Where have all the children gone? Comparing mothers’ and fathers’ declarations in retrospective surveys. Canadian Studies in Population 26(1): 1–20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M., Ivanova, K., van Gaalen, R., Leeuw, D.G.S., van Houdt, K., van Spijker, F., and Hornstra, M. (2018). A multi-actor study of adult children and their parents in complex families: Design and content of the OKiN Survey. European Sociological Review 34(4): 452–470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., and Hooper, P. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(1533): 3289–3299.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Fitch, C.A. (2012). Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: Assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey. Demography 49(4): 1479–1498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kersting, L. and Feldhaus, M. (2016). Die Qualität von Geschwisterbeziehungen im jungen und mittleren Erwachsenenalter in Abhängigkeit des Verwandtschaftsstatus. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 36: 382–401.

Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M., Geisler, E., Castro-Martín, T., Hannemann, T., Heintz-Martin, V., Jalovaara, M., Kulu, H., Meggiolaro, S., Mortelmans, D., Pasteels, I., Seiz, M., and Solaz, A. (2017). Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe. Demographic Research S21(37): 1245–1274.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M. and Jalovaara, M. (2018). Childbearing across partnerships in Finland and Germany. Cham: Springer.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2013). Socioeconomic differences in multipartner fertility among Norwegian men. Demography 50(3): 1135–1153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. and Thomson, E. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of multipartner fertility. Demography 55(6): 2205–2228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 445(7129): 727.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D., Brown, S.L., and Stykes, J.B. (2014). Family complexity among children in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 48–65.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mason, M., Fine, M., and Carnochan, S. (2004). Family law for changing families in the new millennium. In: Coleman, M. and Ganong, L.H. (eds.). Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 432‒450.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. and Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 257–276.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Monte, L.M. (2018). Multiple-partner fertility in the United States: A demographic portrait. Demography 56(1): 103–127.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Müller, B. and Castiglioni, L. (2015). Stable relationships, stable participation? The effects of partnership dissolution and changes in relationship stability on attrition in a relationship and family panel. Survey Research Methods 9(3): 205–219.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nieuwenhuis, R. and Maldonado, L.C. (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families. Bristol: Policy Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pollet, T.V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(3): 176–185.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.-R. and Voorpostel, M. (2009). Parental divorce and sibling relationships: A research note. Journal of Family Issues 30(1): 74–91.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rossi, A.S. and Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Transaction Publishers.

Download reference:

Steinbach, A. and Hank, K. (2018). Full-, half-, and step-sibling relations in young and middle adulthood. Journal of Family Issues 39(9): 2639–2658.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tanskanen, A.O. and Danielsbacka, M. (2014). Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: Results from the Generational Transmissions in Finland surveys. Personality and Individual Differences 69: 5–11.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tanskanen, A.O. and Danielsbacka, M. (2019). Relationship quality among half siblings: The role of childhood co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science 5(1): 13–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., and Rotkirch, A. (2017). Sibling conflicts in full-and half-sibling households in the UK. Journal of Biosocial Science 49(1): 31–47.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tanskanen, A.O. and Rotkirch, A. (2018). Sibling similarity and relationship quality in Finland. Acta Sociologica 62(4): 440–456.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thévenon, O. and Neyer, G. (2014). Family policies and diversity in Europe: The state-of-the-art regarding fertility, work, care, leave, laws and self-sufficiency. Families and Societies Working Paper Series 7.

Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 245–258.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E., Dahlberg, J., and Svallfors, S. (2019). Childbearing across partnerships in Europe. Paper presented at the Nordic Demographic Symposium, Reykyavik, Iceland.

Download reference:

Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography 51(2): 485–508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tillman, K.H. (2008). Coresident sibling composition and the academic ability, expectations, and performance of youth. Sociological Perspectives 51(4): 679–711.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Turunen, J. (2014). Adolescent educational outcomes in blended families: Evidence from Swedish Register Data. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 55(7): 568–589.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Turunen, J. (2011). Entering a stepfamily: Children’s experience of family reconstitution in Sweden 1970‒2000. ZfF – Zeitschrift für Familienforschung / Journal of Family Research 23(2).

van der Heijden, F., Poortman, A.-R., and van der Lippe, T. (2016). Children’s postdivorce residence arrangements and parental experienced time pressure. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(2): 468–481.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Houdt, K., Kalmijn, M., and Ivanova, K. (2018). Family complexity and adult children’s obligations: The role of divorce and co-residential history in norms to support parents and step-parents. European Sociological Review 34(2): 169–183.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wells, M.B. and Bergnehr, D. (2014). Families and family policies in Sweden. In: Robila, M. (ed.). Handbook of family policies across the globe. New York: Springer: 91–107.

Weblink:
Download reference:

White, L. (1998). Who’s counting? Quasi-facts and stepfamilies in reports of number of siblings. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60(3): 725–733.

Weblink:
Download reference:

White, L.K. and Riedmann, A. (1992). When the Brady Bunch grows up: Step/half-and fullsibling relationships in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51(1): 197–208.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiemers, E.E., Seltzer, J.A., Schoeni, R.F., Hotz, V.J., and Bianchi, S.M. (2019). Stepfamily structure and transfers between generations in U.S. families. Demography 56(1): 229–260.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wolfe, B., Haveman, R., Ginther, D., and An, C.B. (1996). The ‘window problem’ in studies of children’s attainments: A methodological exploration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(435): 970–982.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article

Volume
Page
Volume
Article ID