Volume 43 - Article 23 | Pages 659–672
Three facets of planning and postponement of parenthood in the Netherlands
By Renske Verweij, Melinda Mills, Harold Snieder, Gert Stulp
References
Beaujouan, É. and Sobotka, T. (2017). Late motherhood in low-fertility countries: Reproductive intentions, trends and consequences. Human Fertility Database Research Report.
Berrington, A. (2004). Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117: 9–19.
Bongaarts, J., Mensch, B.S., and Blanc, A.K. (2017). Trends in the age at reproductive transitions in the developing world: The role of education. Population Studies 71(2): 139–154.
Dommermuth, L., Klobas, J., and Lappegård, T. (2011). Now or later? The theory of planned behaviour and fertility intentions. Advances in Life Course Research 16(1): 42–53.
Eurostat (2020). Fertility indicators: Mean age of women at birth of first child.
Human Fertility Database (2020). Cohort childlessness at age 44 [electronic resource]. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria).
Knoef, M. and de Vos, K. (2009). The representativeness of LISS, an online probability panel.
Mills, M.C., Rindfuss, R.R., McDonald, P., and te Velde, E.R. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update 17(6): 848–860.
Régnier-Loilier, A. and Vignoli, D. (2011). Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population 66(2): 401–431.
Scherpenzeel, A. (2009). Start of the LISS panel : Sample and recruitment of a probability-based Internet panel. Tilburg.
Spéder, Z. and Kapitany, B. (2015). Influences on the link between fertility intentions and behavioral outcomes: Lessons from a European comparative study. In: Philipov, D., Liefbroer, A.C., and Klobas, J.E. (eds.). Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Cham: Springer Nature: 79‒112.