Volume 43 - Article 48 | Pages 1413–1428
The spatial diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium over 25 years: Geographic proximity and urban hierarchy
By Yoann Doignon, Thierry Eggerickx, Ester Rizzi
References
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Studies in Operational Regional Science 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Béguin, M. and Pumain, D. (2017). La représentation des données géographiques: Statistique et cartographie. Paris: Armand Colin. Cursus.
Bleha, B. and Ďurček, P. (2019). An interpretation of the changes in demographic behaviour at a sub-national level using spatial measures in post-socialist countries: A case study of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Papers in Regional Science 98(1): 331–351.
Caltabiano, M., Dreassi, E., Rocco, E., and Vignoli, D. (2019). A subregional analysis of family change: The spatial diffusion of one-parent families across Italian municipalities, 1991–2011. Population, Space and Place 25(4): e2237.
Casterline, J.B. (2001). Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Introduction. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Cleland, J. (2001). Potatoes and pills: An overview of innovation-diffusion contributions to explanations of fertility decline. In: J.B (ed.). National Research Council and Casterline. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 39–65.
Corijn, M. (2014). Ruimtelijke Spreiding van Het Ongehuwd Samenwonen in Europa, België En Het Vlaamse Gewest.
Costa, R. (2015). Diffusion effects in the Belgian fertility transition: Space‒time analyses at the municipal and individual levels (1887–1934). Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain, Demography.
Di Giulio, P. and Rosina, A. (2007). Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy. Demographic Research 16(14): 441–468.
Elhorst, J.P. (2010). Spatial panel data models. Berlin: Springer.
Gassen, N.S. and Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of union status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy 25(4): 431–449.
Guetto, R., Mancosu, M., Scherer, S., and Torricelli, G. (2016). The spreading of cohabitation as a diffusion process: Evidence from Italy. European Journal of Population 32(5): 661–686.
Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230.
Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243–263.
Kennedy, S. and Bumpass, L.L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19(47): 1663–1692.
Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.
Kurek, S. (2011). Population changes in Poland: A second demographic transition view. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 19: 389–396.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1977). The decline of Belgian fertility, 1800–1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Lopez-Gay, A. (2013). Spatial continuities and discontinuities in two successive demographic transitions: Spain and Belgium, 1880–2010. Demographic Research 28(4): 77–136.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002). From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18(4): 325–360.
Lodewijckx, E. and Deboosere, P. (2008). LIPRO: Een Classificatie van Huishoudens. Brussels: SVR.
Luyten, S. and Van Hecke, E. (2007). Les régions urbaines belges 2001. Statistics Belgium Working Paper 14.
Nazio, T. (2008). Cohabitation, family and society. New York: Routledge (Routledge Advances in Sociology).
Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population 19(1): 47–82.
Poulain, M. and Herm, A. (2013). Le registre de population centralisé, source de statistiques démographiques en Europe. Population 68(2): 215–247.
Saint-Julien, T. (2007). The process of spatial diffusion and modeling change. In: Sanders, L. (ed.). Models in spatial analysis. London: ISTE Ltd: 127–157.
Valkonen, T., Blomgren, J., Kauppinen, T.M., Martikainen, P., and Mäenpää, E. (2008). The effects of socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of regions on the spatial patterns of the Second Demographic Transition in Finland. Demographic Research 19(61): 2043–2056.
van de Kaa, D. and Lesthaeghe, R. (eds.) (1986). Twee demografische transities? Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus (Bevolking: groei en krimp).
Van Hecke, É., Halleux, J.-M., Decroly, J.-M., and Mérenne-Schoumaker, B. (2009). Noyaux d’habitat et régions urbaines dans une Belgique urbanisée. Brussels: SPF Economie.
Vitali, A., Aassve, A., and Lappegård, T. (2015). Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation. Demography 52(2): 355–377.
Wunsch, G. (2001). Variables de confusion, standardisation et indices résumés. In: Caselli, G., Vallin, J., and Wunsch, G.J. (eds.). Démographie: Analyse et synthèse. Tome 1: La dynamique de population. Paris: Institut National d’Études Démographiques: 329–348.
Zaidi, B. and Morgan, S.P. (2017). The second demographic transition: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology 43: 473–492.