Volume 43 - Article 50 | Pages 1461–1494  

Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey

By Eugenio Paglino, Tom Emery

References

MPIDR and Vienna Institute of Demography (2018) [electronic resource]. Human Fertility Database.

Download reference:

Aronson, J., Lustina, M.J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C.M., and Brown, J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(1): 29‒46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, S., Feyisetan, K., and Makinwa-Adebusoye, P. (1995). The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire. Studies in Family Planning 26(4): 233‒240.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Benstead, L.J. (2013). Effects of interviewer: Respondent gender interaction on attitudes toward women and politics: Findings from Morocco. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(3): 369‒383.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blaydes, L. and Gillum, R.M. (2013). Religiosity-of-interviewer effects: Assessing the impact of veiled enumerators on survey response in Egypt. Politics and Religion 6(3): 459‒482.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Catania, J.A., Binson, D., Canchola, J., Pollack, L.M., Hauck, W., and Coates, T.J. (1996). Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 60(3): 345‒375.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, D.W. and Silver, B.D. (2003). Stereotype threat and race of interviewer effects in a survey on political knowledge. American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 33‒45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Haas, S. and Winker, P. (2016). Detecting fraudulent interviewers by improved clustering methods: The case of falsifications of answers to parts of a questionnaire. Journal of Official Statistics 32(3): 643‒660.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dykema, J., Diloreto, K., Price, J.L., White, E., and Schaeffer, N.C. (2012). ACASI gender-of-interviewer voice effects on reports to questions about sensitive behaviors among young adults. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(2): 311‒325.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fadel, L., Emery, T., and Gauthier, A.H. (2020). Current and future contributions of the Generations and Gender Programme to lifecourse research. In: Falkingham, J., Evandrou, M., and Vlachantoni, A. (eds.). Handbook on demographic change and the lifecourse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 57‒68.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Flores-Macias, F. and Lawson, C. (2008). Effects of interviewer gender on survey responses: Findings from a household survey in Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(1): 100–110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gallagher, A.M. and De Lisi, R. (1994). Gender differences in scholastic aptitude test: Mathematics problem solving among high-ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology 86(2): 204–211.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., and B, Puranen (2014). World values survey: round six: Country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute.

Download reference:

Kane, E.W. and Macaulay, L.J. (1993). Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 57(1): 1–28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klüsener, S., Jasilioniene, A., and Yuodeshko, V. (2019). Retraditionalization as a pathway to escape lowest-low fertility? Characteristics and prospects of the Eastern European “baby boom”. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, WP-2019-014.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koczela, S., Furlong, C., McCarthy, J., and Mushtaq, A. (2015). Curbstoning and beyond: Confronting data fabrication in survey research. Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31(3): 413‒422.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M., Hornung, A., Kubisch, K., and Jaschinski, I. (2010). Fertility and union histories from German GGS data: Some critical reflections. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lau, C.Q. (2018). The influence of interviewer characteristics on support for democracy and political engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21(4): 467‒486.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lipps, O. and Pollien, A. (2010). Effects of interviewer experience on components of nonresponse in the European Social Survey. Field Methods 23(2): 156‒172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Olson, K. and Peytchev, A. (2007). Effect of interviewer experience on interview pace and interviewer attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(2).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Polglase, G. (2013). Higher education as soft power in the Eastern Partnership: the case of Belarus. Eastern Journal of European Studies 4(2): 111.

Download reference:

Ruckdeschel, K., Sauer, L., and Naderi, R. (2016). Reliability of retrospective event histories within the German Generations and Gender Survey: The role of interviewer and survey design factors. Demographic Research 34(11): 321‒358.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schäfer, C., Schräpler, J.P., Müller, K.R., and Wagner, G.G. (2004). Automatic identification of faked and fraudulent interviews in surveys by two different methods. DIW Discussion Papers 441.

Download reference:

Shchurko, T. (2012). Compulsory motherhood”: The female reproductive body as regulated by the state (Based on the Analysis of Newspaper Sovetskaia Belorussiia. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research 4(2): 69‒90.

Download reference:

Shchurko, T. (2017). 'Gender education’ in the post-Soviet Belarus: Between authoritarian power, neoliberal ideology, and democratic institutions. Policy Futures in Education 16(4): 434‒448.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tikhonova, L.E. (2004). Marriage and family relations in the Republic of Belarus. Sociological Research 43(1): 83‒91.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tu, S.H. and Liao, P.S. (2007). Social distance, respondent cooperation and item nonresponse in sex survey. Quality and Quantity 41(2): 177‒199.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision. New York: United Nations.

Download reference:

Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723‒774.

Weblink:
Download reference:

World Bank and OECD (2017). World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files [electronic resource].

Download reference:

Back to the article