Volume 44 - Article 1 | Pages 1–48  

Simulating family life courses: An application for Italy, Great Britain, Norway, and Sweden

By Maria Winkler-Dworak, Eva Beaujouan, Paola Di Giulio, Martin Spielauer

References

Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Propper, C., and Dickson, M. (2006). Employment, family union and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 169(4): 781–804 (Series A (Statistics in Society).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aassve, A., Cavalli, N., Mencarini, L., Plach, S., and Bacci, M.L. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and human fertility. Science 369(6502): 370–371.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden. International Migration Review 38(2): 747–774.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G., Thomson, E., and Dunatava, A. (2017). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research 37(35): 1081–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 19(2): 147–169.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment 25(6): 531–561.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Basten, S., Sobotka, T., and Zeman, K. (2014). Future fertility in low fertility countries. In: Lutz, W., Butz, W.P., and KC, S. (eds.). World population and human capital in the twenty-first century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 39–146.

Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research 17(2): 69–80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2016). Second unions now more stable than first? A comparison of separation risks by union order in France. European Journal of Population 32(2): 293–321.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2011). Second-union fertility in France: Partners’ age and other factors. Population-E 66(2): 239–273.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É., Berrington, A., Lyons-Amos, M., and Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2014). User Guide to the Centre for Population Change GHS database 1979–2009. In: ESRC Centre for Population Change (CPC Working Paper. : 47.

Download reference:

Beaujouan, É., Brown, J. J., and Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Reweighting the General Household Survey 1979–2007. Population Trends 145: 119–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S., Landes, E.M., and Michael, R.T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. The Journal of Political Economy 85(6): 1141–1187.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bélanger, A., Morency, J.D., and Spielauer, M. (2010). A microsimulation model to study the interaction between fertility and union formation and dissolution: An application to Canada and Quebec. Canadian Studies in Population 37(3–4): 339–373.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A., Beaujouan, É., Lyons-Amos, M., and Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Evaluation of the Partnership Histories in the Centre for Population Change GHS Time Series Dataset. In: ESRC Centre for Population Change (CPC Working Paper. .

Download reference:

Billari, F.C. (2006). Bridging the gap between micro-demography and macro-demography. Analysis and synthesis 4: 695–707.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., and Scheffran, J. (eds.) (2006). Agent-based computational modelling: Applications in demography, social, economic and environmental sciences. Heidelberg: Physica.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Prskawetz, A. (eds.) (2003). Agent-based computational demography. Heidelberg: Physica.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Rohwer, G. (2002). Techniques of event history modeling: New approaches to causal analysis. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Edbaum Associates.

Download reference:

Brien, M.J., Lillard, L.A., and Waite, L.J. (1999). Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception. Demography 36(4): 535–551.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brines, J. and Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review 64(3): 333–355.

Download reference:

Brückner, H. and Mayer, K.U. (2005). De-standardization of the life course: What it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? Advances in Life Course Research 9: 27–53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., and Castro Martin, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(3): 747–756.

Download reference:

Burch, T.K. (2018). Model-based demography. Demographic Research Monographs. Cham: Springer.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coleman, D. (2013). Partnership in Europe; its variety, trends and dissolution. A section of a work in progress. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research XLVIII: 5–49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Giulio, P. and Rosina, A. (2007). Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy. Demographic Research 16(14): 441–468.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elder, G.H., Johnson, M.K., and Crosnoe, J.R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In: Mortimer, J.T. and Shanahan, M.J. (eds.). Handbook of the life course. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: 3–19.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ermisch, J., Jenkins, S., and Wright, R.E. (1990). Analysis of the dynamics of lone parenthood: Socioeconomic influences on entry and exit rates. In: Duskin, E. (ed.). Lone parent families: The economic challenge. Paris: OECD: 69–90.

Download reference:

Fukuda, S. (2020). Marriage will (continue to) be the key to the future of fertility in Japan and East Asia. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 18.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fürnkranz-Prskawetz, A., Vikat, A., Philipov, D., and Engelhardt-Wölfler, H. (2003). Pathways to stepfamily formation in Europe: Results from the FFS. Demographic Research 8(5): 107–150.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gabrielli, G. and Hoem, J.M. (2010). Italy’s non-negligible cohabitational unions. European Journal of Population 26(1): 33–46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gabrielli, G. and Vignoli, D. (2013). The breaking-down of marriage in Italy: Trends and trendsetters. Population Review 52(1): 87–109.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Griffith, J., Koo, H., and Suchindran, C. (1985). Childbearing and family in remarriage. Demography 22(1): 73–88.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grow, A. and Van Bavel, J. (eds.) (2016). Agent-based modelling in population studies: Concepts, methods, and applications. Cham: Springer (The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. (2017). Is stepfamily status associated with cohabiting and married women’s fertility behaviors. Demography 54: 45–70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. (2014). New partners, more kids. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 66–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hannemann, T. and Kulu, H. (2015). Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom. Demographic Research 33(10): 273–312.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harding, A. and Gupta, A. (eds.) (2007). Modelling our future: Population ageing, social security, and taxation. Amsterdam: Elsevier (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics).

Download reference:

Hewitt, B. and De Vaus, D. (2009). Change in the association between premarital cohabitation and separation, Australia 1945–2000. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(2): 353–361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J.A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research 29(11): 275–306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Human Fertility Database (2019). Human Fertility Database [electronic resource]. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria).

Weblink:
Download reference:

ISTAT (2018). Tavole di fecondità regionale: Tassi specifici di fecondità per età e ordine di nascita a livello regionale.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 29(4): 417–444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jokinen, K. and Kuronen, M. (2011). Chapter 1: Research on families and family policies in Europe: Major trends. In: Uhlendorff, U., Rupp, M., and Euteneuer, M. (eds.). Wellbeing of families in future Europe – Challenges for research and policy. : 13–118 (FamilyPlatform – Families in Europe).

Download reference:

Keeley, M.C. (1977). The economics of family formation. Economic Inquiry 15: 238–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15: 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kuperberg, A. (2014). Age at coresidence, premarital cohabitation, and marriage dissolution: 1985–2009. Journal of Marriage and the Family 76(2): 352–369.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lampard, R. and Peggs, K. (1999). Repartnering: The relevance of parenthood and gender to cohabitation and remarriage among the formerly married. The British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 443–465.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T., Kristensen, A.P., and Mamelund, S.E. (2020). Covid-19 could generate a baby ‘bust’ in the Nordic countries. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Li, J. and O’Donoghue, C. (2013). A survey of dynamic microsimulation models: Uses, model structure and methodology. International Journal of Microsimulation 6(2): 3–55.

Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lillard, L.A., Brien, M.J., and Waite, L.J. (1995). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: A matter of self-selection? Demography 32(3): 437–457.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lillard, L.A. and Waite, L.J. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography 30(4): 653–681.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lutz, W. (1997). FAMSIM-Austria. Feasibility study for a dynamic microsimulation model for projections and the evaluation of family policies based on the European Family and Fertility Survey. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Familienforschung, Schriftenreihe; 5.

Download reference:

Lyngstad, T.H. and Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research 23(10): 257–292.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Cohen, J.A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: An examination of recent marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(2): 377–387.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Matysiak, A. and Vignoli, D. (2008). Fertility and women’s employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie0 24(4): 363–384.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mayer, K.U. (2009). New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 413–433.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2010). The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research 23(34): 963–996.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morand, E., Toulemon, L., Pennec, S., Baggio, R., and Billari, F. (2010). Demographic modelling: The state of the art. Paris: INED, SustainCity Working Paper; 2.1a.

Download reference:

Murphy, M. (2011). Long-term effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain. Population and Development Review 37: 55–80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M.J. (2004). Tracing very long-term kinship networks using SOCSIM. Demographic Research 10(7): 171–196.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mussino, E. and Strozza, S. (2012). The fertility of immigrants after arrival: The Italian case. Demographic Research 26(4): 99–130.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M., Beaujouan, É., and Murphy, M. (2011). Sources of error in reported childlessness in a continuous British household survey. Population Studies 65(3): 305–318.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Download reference:

Office of National Statistics (2018). Childbearing for women born in different years [electronic resource].

Office of National Statistics (2018). Divorces in England and Wales: 2017 [electronic resource].

Office of National Statistics (2019). Marriages in England and Wales, 2016 [electronic resource].

Oláh, L.Sz. (2015). Changing families in the European Union: Trends and policy implications. FamiliesAndSocieties Working Paper 44.

Download reference:

Orcutt, G. (1957). A new type of socio-economic system. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 116–123.

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories: Manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, MPIDR Working Paper; WP-2010-011.

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167–182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38: 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography 47(3): 719–733.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ridley, J.C. and Sheps, M.C. (1966). An analytic simulation model of human reproduction with demographic and biological components. Population Studies 19(3): 297–310.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research 11(6): 149–172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruggles, S. (1993). Confessions of a microsimulator: Problems in modeling the demography of kinship. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 26(4): 161–169.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sargent, R.G. (ed.) (2010). Verification and validation of simulation models. Phoenix: IEEE (Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference).

Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2019). Family change and changing family demography. Demography 56(2): 405–426.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Settersten, R.A., Bernardi, L., Härkönen, J., Antonucci, T.C., Dykstra, P.A., Heckhausen, J., Kuh, D., Mayer, K.U., Moen, P., Mortimer, J.T., Mulder, C.H. , Smeeding, T.M. , van der Lippe, T., Hagestad, G.O. , Kohli, M. , Levy, R. , Schoon, I., and Thomson, E. (2020). Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research 45(100360).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Skew, A., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2009). Repartnering in the United Kingdom and Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40(4): 563–585.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J. and Greenland, F.R. (2010). Diversity in pathways to parenthood: Patterns, implications, and emerging research directions. Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 576–593.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 7: The rising importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe. Demographic Research 19(9): 225–248.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spéder, Z. and Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward / Les intentions de fécondité sont-elles réalisées dans le délai prévu? Réalisation, report, abandon, avancement. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 25(4): 503–523.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spielauer, M. (2009). General characteristics of Modgen applications: exploring the model RiskPaths. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Spielauer, M. (2009). Modgen and the application RiskPaths from the model developer’s view.

Spielauer, M. (2011). What is social science microsimulation? Social Science Computer Review 29(1): 9–20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spielauer, M. and Dupriez, O. (2017). A portable dynamic microsimulation model for population, education and health applications in developing countries. International Journal of Microsimulation 12(3): 6–27.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spielauer, M., Kostova, D., and Koytcheva, E. (2007). First and second births in first and second unions: a decomposition of fertility decline in Bulgaria and Russia since the 1989 economic and political transition. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, MPIDR Working Paper; WP-2007-001.

Download reference:

Spielauer, M. and Vencatasawmy, C.P. (2001). FAMSIM: Dynamic microsimulation of life course interactions between education, work, partnership formation and birth in Austria, Belgium, Italy, Spain and Sweden. Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics 4(2): 143–164 (Reprinted in Vienna Yearbook of Population Research).

Download reference:

StataCorp (2013). Stata Statistical Softare: Release 13. College Station: StataCorp LP.

Download reference:

Statistics Canada (2009). Modgen.

Statistics Norway (2018). Number of children distributed, by age and cohort. Per cent [electronic resource].

Steele, F., Joshi, H., Kallis, C., and Goldstein, H. (2006). Changing compatibility of cohabitation and childbearing between young British women born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies 60(2): 137–152.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., and Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography 42(4): 647–673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Kallis, C., and Joshi, H. (2006). The formation and outcomes of cohabiting and marital partnerships in early adulthood: The role of previous partnership experience. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 169(4): 757–779 (Series A (Statistics in Society).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomas, A., Karpilow, Q., Welti, K., Manlove, J., and Cook, E. (2017). A microsimulation model of fertility, childbearing, and child well-being. International Journal of Microsimulation 10(2): 3–58.

Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2018).

Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2004). Stepfamilies and childbearing desires in Europe. Demographic Research S3(5): 116–134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E., Hoem, J.M., Vikat, A., Prskawetz, A., Buber, I., Toulemon, L., Henz, U., Godecker, A.L., and Kantorova, V. (2002). Childbearing in stepfamilies: How parity matters. In: E, Klijzing and Corijn, M. (eds.). Fertility and partnership in Europe: Findings and lessons from comparative research. Geneva and New York: United Nations: 87–99.

Download reference:

Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., and Beaujouan, É (2019). Contribution of the rise in cohabitating parenthood to family instability: Cohort change in Italy, Great Britain, and Scandinavia. Demography 56(6): 2063–2082.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., and Kennedy, S. (2013). The standard family life course: An assessment of variability in life course pathways. In: Evans, A. and Baxter, J. (eds.). Negotiating the life course. Dordrecht: Springer: 35–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., Spielauer, M., and Prskawetz, A. (2012). Union instability as an engine of fertility? A microsimulation model for France. Demography 49(1): 175–195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thorsen, M.L. (2019). Shifting influences of pregnancy on union formation across age and union stability across cohabitation duration. Journal of Family Issues 40(2): 190–214.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tomassini, C. and Wolf, D. A. (2000). Shrinking kin networks in Italy due to sustained low fertility. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 16(4): 353–372.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Toulemon, L. (2004). Fertility among immigrant women: New data, a new approach. Population and Societies 400.

Download reference:

Toulemon, L. and Testa, M.R. (2005). Fertility intentions and actual fertility: A complex relationship. Population and Societies 415.

Download reference:

Troitzsch, K.G. (ed.) (2004). Validating simulation models. (Proceedings of 18th European Simulation Multiconference on Networked Simulation and Simulation Networks, SCS Publishing House).

Download reference:

Tromans, N., Jefferies, J., and Natamba, E. (2009). Have women born outside the UK driven the rise in UK births since 2001? Population Trends 136(1): 28–42.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Imhoff, E. and Post, W. (1998). Microsimulation methods for population projection. Population: An English Selection : 97–138.

Download reference:

Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723–774.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D. and Ferro, I. (2009). Rising marital disruption in Italy and its correlates. Demographic Research 20(4): 11–36.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vikat, A., Thomson, E., and Hoem, J. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies 53(2): 211–225.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wachter, K. W. (1997). Kinship resources for the elderly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 352(1363): 1811–1817.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Willekens, F.J. (2009). Continuous-time microsimulation in longitudinal analysis. In: Zaidi, A., Harding, A., and Williamson, P. (eds.). New frontiers in microsimulation modelling. London: Routledge: 353–376.

Download reference:

Willekens, F.J. (1999). The life-course approach: Models and analysis. In: Wissen, L. J. G. and Dykstra, P. (eds.). Population issues: An interdisciplinary focus. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 23–51.

Download reference:

Willekens, F.J. (2001). Theorectical and technical orientations toward longitudional research in the social sciences. Special issue on longitudional methodology. Canadian Studies in Population 28(2): 189–217.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wilson, B. (2020). Understanding how immigrant fertility differentials vary over the reproductive life course. European Journal of Population 36: 465–498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Winkler-Dworak, M., Beaujouan, É., Di Giulio, P., and Spielauer, M. (2019). Simulating family life courses: An application for Italy, Great Britain, and Scandinavia Vienna. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, VID Working Paper 08/2019.

Download reference:

Wu, Z. and Schimmele, C.M. (2005). Repartnering after first union disruption. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(1): 27–36.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zagheni, E. (2015). Microsimulation in demographic research. In: Wright, J.D. (ed.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd: 343–346.

Download reference:

Zagheni, E. (2011). The impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic on kinship resources for orphans in Zimbabwe. Population and Development Review 37(4): 761–783.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zaidi, A. and Rake, K. (2001). Dynamic microsimulation models: A review and some lessons for SAGE. London: London School of Economics, ESRC SAGE Research Group’s Discussion Paper.

Download reference:

Zeigler, B.P. (1985). Theory of modelling and simulation. (Reprint, first published in 1976.).

Download reference:

Zinn, S. (2011). A continuous-time microsimulation and first steps towards a multi-level approach in demography. Rostock: University Rostock.

Zinn, S. (2012). A mate-matching algorithm for continuous-time microsimulation models. International Journal of Microsimulation 5(1): 31–51.

Download reference:

Zinn, S. (2017). Simulating synthetic life courses of individuals and couples, and mate matching. In: Grow, A. and Van Bavel, J. (eds.). Agent-based modelling in population studies. Cham: Springer: 113–157 (The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article

Volume
Page
Volume
Article ID