Volume 44 - Article 10 | Pages 239–276  

Singlehood in contemporary Japan: Rating, dating, and waiting for a good match

By Mary C. Brinton, Eunmi Mun, Ekaterina Hertog

References

Becker, G.S. (1973). A theory of marriage, part I. Journal of Political Economy 81(4): 813‒846.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics 3(1): 33‒58.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bergstrom, M. (2018). What’s behind the age gap between spouses? Big data and the study of age difference within couples. Revue Francaise de Sociologie 59(3): 395‒422.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 513‒530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Boxer, C.F., Noonan, M.C., and Whelan, C.B. (2015). Measuring mate preferences: A replication and extension. Journal of Family Issues 36(2): 163‒187.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Breen, R. and Salazar, L. (2011). Educational assortative mating and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 117(3): 808‒843.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brinton, M.C. (2011). Lost in transition: Youth, work, and instability in postindustrial Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brinton, M.C. (2001). Women’s working lives in East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Download reference:

Brinton, M.C. and Oh, E. (2019). Babies, work, or both? Highly educated women’s employment and fertility in East Asia. American Journal of Sociology 125(1): 105‒140.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L. and Sweet, J.A. (1972). Differentials in marital instability: 1970. American Sociological Review 37(6): 754‒766.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bursztyn, L., Fujiwara, T., and Pallais, A. (2017). Acting wife’: Marriage market incentives and labor market investments. American Economic Review 107(11): 3288‒3319.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1‒49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buss, D.M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research 35(1): 19‒31.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buss, D.M., Shackelford, T.K., Kirkpatrick, L.A., and Larsen, R.J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(2): 491‒503.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ciscato, E. and Weber, S. (2020). The role of evolving marital preferences in growing income inequality. Journal of Population Economics 33(1): 307‒347.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dernberger, B.N. and Pepin, J.R. (2020). Gender flexibility, but not equality: Young adults’ division of labor preferences. Sociological Science 7: 36‒56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dunn, M.J., Brinton, S., and Clark, L. (2010). Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: Comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior 31(6): 383‒393.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edwards, R.D. and Roff, J. (2016). What mom and dad’s match means for junior: Marital sorting and child outcomes. Labour Economics 40: 43‒56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eika, L., Mogstad, M., and Zafar, B. (2019). Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. Journal of Political Economy 127(6): 2795‒2835.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esteve, A., Schwartz, C.R., Van Bavel, J., Permanyer, I., Klesment, M., and García-Román, J. (2016). The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications. Population and Development Review 42(4): 615‒625.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eurostat (2015). Demography report.

Feliciano, C., Robnett, B., and Komaie, G. (2009). Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters. Social Science Research 38(1): 39‒54.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fernandez, R., Guner, J., and Knowles, J. (2005). Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(Feb): 273‒344.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fisman, R., Iyengar, S.S., Kamenica, E., and Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 673‒697.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fukuda, S. (2013). The changing role of women’s earnings in marriage formation in Japan. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 646: 107‒128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fukuda, S., Raymo, J.M., and Yoda, S. (2019). Revisiting the educational gradient in marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(4): 1378‒1396.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fukuda, S., Yoda, S., and Mogi, R. (2019). Educational assortative mating in Japan: Evidence from the 1980‒2010 census. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, NIPPSR Working Paper Series (E) 29.

Download reference:

Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69(6): 751‒767.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/ hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Genda, Y. (2001). Shigoto no naka no aimai na fuan (A vague sense of job insecurity. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron Shinsha.

Download reference:

Hertog, E. (2020). Attitudes to marriage and childbearing. In: Coates, J., Fraser, L., and Pendleton, M. (eds.). The Routledge companion to gender and Japanese culture. London: Routledge: 92‒105.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hertog, E. and Kan, M.Y. (2019). Education and gendered division of domestic labor over time in contemporary Japan. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Austin, Texas, 2019.

Download reference:

Hitsch, G.J., Hortaçsu, A., and Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 8(4): 393‒427.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hook, J.L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965‒2003. American Sociological Review 71(4): 639‒660.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 395‒421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kan, M.Y. and Hertog, E. (2017). Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Demographic Research 36(18): 557‒587.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Killewald, A. (2016). Money, work, and marital stability: Assessing change in the gendered determinants of divorce. American Sociological Review 81(4): 696‒719.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kippen, R., Chapman, B., Yu, P., and Lounkaew, K. (2013). What’s love got to do with it? Homogamy and dyadic approaches to understanding marital instability. Journal of Population Research 30(3): 213‒247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lee, S. (2008). Preferences and choice constraints in marital sorting: Evidence from Korea. Stanford: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, SIEPR working paper 07-042.

Download reference:

Lenton, A.P., Fasolo, B., and Todd, P.M. (2010). Who is in your shopping cart? Expected and experienced effects of choice abundance in the online dating context. In: Knock, N. (ed.). Evolutionary psychology and information systems research: A new approach to studying the effects of modern technologies on human behavior. New York: Springer: 149‒167.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lin, K.H. and Lundquist, J.H. (2013). Mate selection in cyberspace: The intersection of race, gender, and education. American Journal of Sociology 119(1): 183‒215.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mare, R.D. (2016). Educational homogamy in two gilded ages: Evidence from inter-generational social mobility data. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 663(1): 117‒139.

Weblink:
Download reference:

METI (2005). A survey on marriage advice/ marriage information services (Kekkon Sōdan/ kekkon jōhō sābisu ni kansuru chōsa). Tokyo: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

Weblink:
Download reference:

MEXT (2017). Report of Education related statistics (Monbu kagaku tōkei yōran). Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.

Weblink:
Download reference:

National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2015). 15th national fertility survey: Marriage process and fertility of married couples, and attitudes toward marriage and family among Japanese singles. Tokyo: Department of Population Dynamics Research.

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Sigle-Rushton, W. (2005). Partner supply in Britain and the US: Estimates and gender contrasts. Population 60(1‒2): 37‒64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ochiai, E. and Molony, B. (2008). Asia’s new mothers: Crafting gender roles and childcare networks in east and southeast Asian societies. Kent: Global Oriental Limited.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2020). Time use database. Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Weblink:
stats.oecd.org/
Download reference:

Ono, H. (2003). Women’s economic standing, marriage timing, and cross-national contexts of gender. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(2): 275‒286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563‒591.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osawa, M., Kim, M.J., and Kingston, J. (2013). Precarious work in Japan. American Behavioral Scientist 57(3): 309‒334.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Download reference:

Piotrowski, M., Kalleberg, A., and Rindfuss, R.R. (2015). Contingent work rising: Implications for the timing of marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(5): 1039‒1056.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pollet, T.V. and Nettle, D. (2008). Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population. Biology Letters 4(1): 31‒33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Potarca, G. and Mills, M. (2015). Racial preferences in online dating across European countries. European Sociological Review 31(3): 326‒341.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Qian, Y. and Sayer, L.C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(2): 383‒400.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J.M. and Iwasawa, M. (2005). Marriage market mismatches in Japan: An alternative view of the relationship between women’s education and marriage. American Sociological Review 70(5): 801‒822.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J.M., Park, H., Xie, Y., and Yeung, W.J.J. (2015). Marriage and family in East Asia: Continuity and change. Annual Review of Sociology 41(1): 471‒492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J.M. and Shibata, A. (2017). Unemployment, nonstandard employment, and fertility: Insights from Japan’s ‘Lost 20 years’. Demography 54(6): 2301‒2329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Retherford, R.D., Ogawa, N., and Matsukura, R. (2001). Late marriage and less marriage in Japan. Population and Development Review 27(1): 65‒102.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schmitz, A., Skopek, J., and Blossfeld, H.P. (2011). The gendered dynamics of age preferences – Empirical evidence from online dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23(3): 267‒290.

Download reference:

Schmitz, A., Zillmann, D., and Blossfeld, H.P. (2013). Do women pick up lies before men? The association between gender, deception patterns, and detection modes in online dating. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 3(3): 52‒73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schwartz, C.R. (2010). Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses’ earnings. American Journal of Sociology 115(5): 1524‒1557.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schwartz, C.R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology 39: 451‒470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Skopek, J., Schmitz, A., and Blossfeld, H.P. (2011). The gendered dynamics of age preferences: Empirical evidence from online dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 27(2): 267‒290.

Download reference:

South, S.J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53(4): 928‒940.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review 67(1): 132‒147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. and Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 1015‒1028.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Todd, P.M., Billari, F.C., and Simão, J. (2005). Aggregate age-at-marriage patterns from individual mate search. Demography 42(3): 559‒574.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Todd, P.M. and Miller, G. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Realistic heuristics for mate search. New York: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Tsuya, N. (2006). Patterns and covariates of partnership formation in Japan. Journal of Population Problems 62(1‒2): 1‒19.

Download reference:

Tsuya, N., Bumpass, L., and Choe, M. (2000). Gender, employment, and housework in Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Review of Population and Social Policy 9: 195‒220.

Download reference:

Tsuya, N., Bumpass, L., Choe, M.K., and Rindfuss, R.R. (2012). Employment and household tasks of Japanese couples, 1994‒2009. Demographic Research 27: 705‒717.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations (2017). World Marriage Data 2017. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

Download reference:

Yu, W.H. and Hertog, E. (2018). Family characteristics and mate selection: Evidence from computer-assisted dating in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family 80(3): 589‒606.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article