Volume 44 - Article 37 | Pages 879–898  

Has contraceptive use at pregnancy an effect on the odds of spontaneous termination and induced abortion? Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys

By David A. Sánchez-Páez, José Antonio Ortega

References

Ahmed, S. and Ray, R. (2014). Determinants of pregnancy, induced and spontaneous abortion in a jointly determined framework: Evidence from a country-wide, district-level household survey in India. Journal of Biosocial Science 46(4): 480–517.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bankole, A., Singh, S., and Haas, T. (1998). Reasons why women have induced abortions: Evidence from 27 countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 24(3): 117–127.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bradley, S., Croft, T., and Rutstein, S.O. (2011). The impact of contraceptive failure on unintended births and induced abortions: Estimates and strategies for reduction. Calverton: ICF Macro (DHS Analytical Studies 22).

Download reference:

Bradley, S., Winfrey, W., and Croft, T.N. (2015). Contraceptive use and perinatal mortality in the DHS: An assessment of the quality and consistency of calendars and histories. Rockville : ICF International (DHS Methodological Reports 17).

Download reference:

Cheng, D., Schwarz, E.B., Douglas, E., and Horon, I. (2009). Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception 79(3): 194–198.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cheng, S. and Long, J.S. (2007). Test for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociological Methods and Research 35(4): 583–600.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cleland, J. (2020). The complex relationship between contraception and abortion. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 62: 90–100.

Weblink:
Download reference:

DHS Program (2020). Demographic and health surveys (DHS).

Weblink:
dhsprogram.com/Data/
Download reference:

DHS Program (2017). DHS contraceptive calendar tutorial [electronic resource] [electronic resource]. Rockville: Demographic and Health Surveys Program.

Dickson, K.S., Adde, K.S., and Ahinkorah, B. (2018). Socio-economic determinants of abortion among women in Mozambique and Ghana: Evidence from demographic and health surveys. Archives of Public Health 76(37): 36–46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Flower, A., Shawe, J., Stephenson, J., and Doyle, P. (2013). Pregnancy planning, smoking behaviour during pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: UK millennium cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 13(1): 238–244.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guliani, H., Sepehri, A., and Serieux, J. (2013). Determinants of prenatal care use: Evidence from 32 low-income countries across Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Health Policy and Planning 29(5): 589–602.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jellesen, R., Stransberg-Larsen, K., Jorgensen, T., Olsen, J., Thulstrup, A.M., and Andersen, A.M. (2008). Maternal use of oral contraceptives and risk of fetal death. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 22(4): 334–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kost, K., Landry, D.J., and Darroch, J.E. (1998). Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: Does intention status matter? Family Planning Perspectives 30(2): 79–88.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Vanderhoeft, C. (2001). Ready, willing and able: A conceptualization of transitions to new behavioural forms. In: Casterline, J.B. (ed.). Diffusion processes and fertility transition. Selected perspectives. Washington: National Academy Press: 240–264.

Download reference:

MacQuarrie, K.L.D., Winfrey, W., Meijer-Irons, J., and Roback Morse, A. (2018). Consistency of reporting of terminated pregnancies in DHS calendars. Rockville: ICF (DHS Metodological Reports 25).

Download reference:

Maharana, B. (2017). Abortion decision making in India: Whose role is vital? Social Science Spectrum 2(4): 263–274.

Download reference:

Marston, C. and Cleland, J. (2004). The effects of contraception on obstetric outcomes. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization.

Download reference:

Meister, R. and Schaefer, C. (2008). Statistical methods for estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in observational studies: Analyzing pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives. Reproductive Toxicology 26(1): 31–35.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, G. and Valente, C. (2016). Population policy: Abortion and modern contraception are substitutes. Demography 53(4): 979–1009.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mosley, W.H. and Chen, L.C. (2003). An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries: Public health classics. International Journal of Public Health 81(2): 140–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nfii, F.N. (2017). Levels, trends and household determinants of stillbirths and miscarriages among women aged 15-49 years in South Africa [MA Thesis]. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand, Faculties of Health Sciences and Humanities.

Download reference:

Polis, C.B., Bradley, S.E.K., Bankole, A., Onda, T., Croft, T., and Singh, S. (2016). Typical-use contraceptive failure rates in 43 countries with demographic and health survey data: Summary of a detailed report. Contraception 94(1): 11–17.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Potter, R.G., Ford, K., and Moots, B. (1975). Competition between spontaneous and induced abortion. Demography 12(1): 129–141.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sánchez-Páez, D.A. and Ortega, J.A. (2019). Reported patterns of pregnancy termination from demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221178.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoumaker, B. (2014). Quality and consistency of DHS fertility estimates. Rockville: ICF International (DHS Methodological Reports 12).

Download reference:

Schwandt, H.M., Creanga, A.A., Danso, K.A., Adanu, R.M.K., Agbenyega, T., and Hindin, M.J. (2011). A comparison of women with induced abortion, spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy in Ghana. Contraception 84(1): 87–93.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Silva, R., Oliveira Carneiro, C., Drezett, J., Andreoni, S., and Souza (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of women with a history of abortion among women who became pregnant. Journal of Human Growth and Development 22(1): 27–33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smedberg, J., Lupattelli, A., Mårdby, A.C., and Nordeng, H. (2014). Characteristics of women who continue smoking during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study of pregnant women and new mothers in 15 European countries. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14(1): 213–228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ulrich, F. and Petermann, F. (2016). Consequences and possible predictors of health-damaging behaviors and mental health problems in pregnancy: A review. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 76(11): 1136–1156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations (2014). World contraceptive use. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

Waller, D., Gallaway, M., Taylor, L., Ramadhani, T., Canfield, M., Scheuerle, A., Hernández-Díaz, S., Louik, C., and Correa, A. (2010). Use of oral contraceptives in pregnancy and major structural birth defects in offspring. Epidemiology 21(2): 232–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. (2005). Recent trends in abortion and contraception in 12 countries. Calverton: ORC Macro (DHS Analytical Studies 8).

Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. (2000). The substitution of contraception for abortion in Kazakhstan in the 1990s. Calverton: ORC Macro (DHS Analytical Studies Series 1).

Download reference:

Westoff, C.F., Sullivan, J.M., Newby, H.A., and Themme, A.R. (2002). Contraception–abortion connections in Armenia. Calverton: ORC Macro (DHS Analytical Studies Series 6).

Download reference:

Back to the article