Volume 44 - Article 38 | Pages 899–940  

The social context of retrospective-prospective changes in pregnancy desire during the transition to adulthood: The role of fathers and intimate relationships

By Jennifer Barber, Heather Gatny

References

Aiken, A.R.A. (2015). Happiness about unintended pregnancy and its relationship to contraceptive desires among a predominantly Latina cohort. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 47(2): 99–106.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aiken, A.R.A., Borrero, S., Callegari, L.S., and Dehlendorf, C. (2016). Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 48(3): 147–151.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aiken, A.R.A. and Potter, J.E. (2013). Are Latina women ambivalent about pregnancies they are trying to prevent? Evidence from the Border Contraceptive Access study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 45(4): 196–203.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aiken, A.R.A. and Trussell, J. (2017). Anticipated emotions about unintended pregnancy in relationship context: Are Latinas really happier?: Anticipated emotions about unintended pregnancy. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(2): 356–371.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bachrach, C.A. and Morgan, S.P. (2013). A cognitive-social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review 39(3): 459–485.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J. S., Kusunoki, Y., Gatny, H., and Schulz, P. (2016). Participation in an intensive longitudinal study with weekly web surveys over 2.5 years. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(6).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S., Kusunoki, Y., Gatny, H., and Melendez, R. (2017). The relationship context of young pregnancies. Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice 35(2): 174–197.

Download reference:

Barber, J.S., Kusunoki, Y., and Gatny, H.H. (2011). Design and implementation of an online weekly journal to study unintended pregnancies. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research / Vienna Institute of Demography. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences: 327–334.

Download reference:

Barber, J.S., Yarger, J.E., and Gatny, H.H. (2015). Black-white differences in attitudes related to pregnancy among young women. Demography 52(3): 751–786.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Biggs, M.A., Upadhyay, U.D., McCulloch, C.E., and Foster, D.G. (2017). Women’s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry 74(2): 169–178.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blake, S.M., Kiely, M., Gard, C.C., El-Mohandes, A.A.E., El-Khorazaty, M.N., and Initiative, N.I.H.D.C. (2007). Pregnancy intentions and happiness among pregnant black women at high risk for adverse infant health outcomes. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(4): 194–205.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review 4(1): 105–132.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Burton, L.M. and Tucker, M.B. (2009). Romantic unions in an era of uncertainty: A post-Moynihan perspective on African American women and marriage. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 621(1): 132–148.

Download reference:

Cabrera, N.J., Shannon, J., Mitchell, S., and West, J. (2009). Mexican American mothers and fathers’ prenatal attitudes and father prenatal involvement: Links to mother-infant interaction and father engagement. Sex Roles 60(7–8): 510–526.

Download reference:

Coale, A.J. (1972). The growth and structure of human populations: A Mathematical investigation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Cowley, C. and Farley, T. (2001). Adolescent girls’ attitudes toward pregnancy: the importance of asking what the boyfriend wants. The Journal of Family Practice 50(7): 603–607.

Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Ela, E.J. and Budnick, J. (2017). Non-heterosexuality, relationships, and young women’s contraceptive behavior. Demography 54(3): 887–909.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Finer, L.B. and Zolna, M.R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine 374(9): 843–852.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., and Flanders, N. A. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Don Mills.

Download reference:

Gelman, A. and Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing Type S (sign) and Type M (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(6): 641–651.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gipson, J.D., Koenig, M.A., and Hindin, M.J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning 39(1): 18–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gómez, A.M., Arteaga, S., Ingraham, N., Arcara, J., and Villaseñor, E. (2018). It’s not planned, but is it okay? The acceptability of unplanned pregnancy among young people. Women’s Health Issues 28(5): 408–414.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gómez, A.M., Arteaga, S., Villaseñor, E., Arcara, J., and Freihart, B. (2019). The misclassification of ambivalence in pregnancy intentions: A mixed-methods analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 51(1): 7–15.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2013). Survey Methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B., Eickmeyer, K., and Hayford, S.R. (2018). Does postpartum contraceptive use vary by birth intendedness? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 50(3): 129–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S. (2011). Fertility following an unintended first birth. Demography 48(4): 1493–1516.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S.R. (2014). Revisiting Retrospective Reporting of First-Birth Intendedness. Maternal and Child Health Journal 18(9): 2141–2147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hall, J.A., Benton, L., Copas, A., and Stephenson, J. (2017). Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal and Child Health Journal 21(3): 670–704.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hartnett, C. (2014). White-Hispanic differences in meeting lifetime fertility intentions in the U.S. Demographic Research 30(43): 1245–1276.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hartnett, C.S. (2012). Are Hispanic women happier about unintended births? Population Research and Policy Review 31(5): 683–701.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography 46(4): 765–83.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. and Guzzo, K.B. (2016). Fifty years of unintended births: education gradients in unintended fertility in the US, 1960–2013. Population and Development Review 42(2): 313–341.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R., Guzzo, K.B., Kusunoki, Y., and Barber, J.S. (2016). Perceived costs and benefits of early childbearing: New dimensions and predictive power. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 48(2): 83–91.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. and Morgan, S.P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces 86(3): 1163–1188.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Johnson-Hanks, J.A., Bachrach, C.A., Morgan, S.P., and Kohler, H.P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation: Toward a theory of conjunctural action. Dordrecht: Springer.

Download reference:

Jones, R.K. (2017). Are uncertain fertility intentions a temporary or long-term outlook? Findings from a panel study. Women’s Health Issues 27(1): 21–28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Joyce, T.J., Kaestner, R., and Korenman, S. (2002). On the validity of retrospective assessments of pregnancy intention. Demography 39(1): 199–213.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Joyce, T.J., Kaestner, R., and Korenman, S. (2000). The effect of pregnancy intention on child development. Demography 37(1): 83–94.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kost, K. and Lindberg, L. (2015). Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant health: Investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score analysis. Demography 52(1): 83–111.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kost, K., Maddow-Zimet, I., and Arpaia, A. (2017). Pregnancies, births and abortions among adolescents and young women in the United States, 2013: National and state trends by age, race and ethnicity. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

Download reference:

Kost, K., Maddow-Zimet, I., and Kochhar, S. (2018). Pregnancy desires and pregnancies at the state level: Estimates for 2014. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

Download reference:

Kost, K. and Zolna, M. (2019). Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy: A response. Contraception 100(1): 5–9.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Krosnick, J.A. and Alwin, D.E. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 416–425.

Download reference:

Kusunoki, Y., Barber, J.S., Ela, E.J., and Bucek, A. (2016). Black-white differences in sex and contraceptive use among young women. Demography 53(5): 1399–1428.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R.J. and Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review 32(4): 669–698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lindberg, L., Kost, K., Maddow-Zimet, I., Desai, S., and Zolna, M. (2020). Abortion reporting in the United States: An assessment of three national fertility surveys. Demography 57(3): 899–925.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lindberg, L. and Scott, R.H. (2018). Effect of ACASI on reporting of abortion and other pregnancy outcomes in the US National Survey of family growth. Studies in Family Planning 49(3): 259–278.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Macleod, C.I. (2016). Public reproductive health and ‘unintended’ pregnancies: introducing the construct ‘supportability’. Journal of Public Health 38(3): 384–391.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs 120(2): 225–258.

Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (2015). The childbearing motivational system: Consciousness, executive functions, and the neural substrate. Aptos: Transnational Family Research Institute.

Download reference:

Miller, W.B., Barber, J.S., and Gatny, H.H. (2013). The effects of ambivalent fertility desires on pregnancy risk in young women in the USA. Population Studies 67(1): 25–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B., Barber, J.S., and Schulz, P. (2017). Do perceptions of their partners’ childbearing desires affect young women’s pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence. Population Studies 71(1): 101–116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B., Bard, D.E., Pasta, D.J., and Rodgers, J.L. (2010). Biodemographic modeling of the links between fertility motivation and fertility outcomes in the NLSY79. Demography 47(2): 393–414.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (1995). Behavioral intentions: Which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530–555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (2002). The motivational substrate of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 7(1): 1–29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B., Severy, L., and Pasta, D. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies 58(2): 193–205.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rackin, H. and Morgan, S.P. (2018). Prospective versus retrospective measurement of unwanted fertility: Strengths, weaknesses, and inconsistencies assessed for a cohort of US women. Demographic Research 39(3): 61–94.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ray, C., Harcey, S., Greil, A.L., Tiemeyer, S., and McQuillan, J. (2018). Stability and change in personal fertility ideals among U.S. women in heterosexual relationships. Demographic Research 39(16): 459–486.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rocca, C.H., Hubbard, A.E., Johnson‐Hanks, J., Padian, N.S., and Minnis, A.M. (2010). Predictive ability and stability of adolescents’ pregnancy intentions in a predominantly Latino community. Studies in Family Planning 41(3): 179–192.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ronis, D.L. (1992). Conditional health threats: Health beliefs, decisions, and behaviors among adults. Health Psychology 11(2): 127–34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schacter, D.L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist 54(3): 182–203.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Shreffler, K.M., Greil, A.L., Mitchell, K.S., and McQuillan, J. (2014). Variation in pregnancy intendedness across U.S. women’s pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19(5): 932–938.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343–354.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trussell, J., Vaughan, B., and Stanford, J. (1999). Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 246–260.

Download reference:

Waller, M.R. and Bitler, M.P. (2008). The link between couples’ pregnancy intentions and behavior: does it matter who is asked? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(4): 194–201.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Weitzman, A., Barber, J.S., Kusunoki, Y., and England, P. (2017). Desire for and to avoid pregnancy during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(4): 1060–1075.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. and Ryder, N.B. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography 14(4): 431–453.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yeatman, S. and Sennott, C. (2015). The sensitivity of measures of unwanted and unintended pregnancy using retrospective and prospective reporting: Evidence from Malawi. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19(7): 1593–1600.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article