Volume 45 - Article 15 | Pages 469–516  

Parental socioeconomic status and the timing of first marriage: What is the role of unmarried cohabitation? Results from a cross-national comparison

By Anne Brons, Aart C. Liefbroer, Harry B.G. Ganzeboom

References

Allison, P.D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1992). The influence of parental resources on the timing of the transition to marriage. Social Science Research 21(3): 261–285.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Béchard, M. and Marchand, I. (2008). General Social Survey Cycle 20: Family transitions (2006) – Public use microdata file documentation and user’s guide. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2–3): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bloome, D. and Ang, S. (2020). Marriage and union formation in the United States: Recent trends across racial groups and economic backgrounds. Demography 57(5): 1753–1786.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P., Hamerle, A., and Mayer, K.U. (2014). Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. New York: Psychology Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brons, M.D., Liefbroer, A.C., and Ganzeboom, H.B.G. (2017). Parental socio-economic status and first union formation: Can European variation be explained by the second demographic transition theory? European Sociological Review 33(6): 809–822.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bryan, M.L. and Jenkins, S.P. (2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review 32(1): 3–22.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L., Sweet, J.A., and Cherlin, A.J. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53(4): 338–355.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Calinski, T. and Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics 3(1): 1–27.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casper, L.M. and Bianchi, S.M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Download reference:

CBS (2012). Documentatierapport Onderzoekgezinsvorming 2008V1. The Hague: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.

Download reference:

Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coppola, L. (2004). Education and union formation as simultaneous processes in Italy and Spain. European Journal of Population 20(3): 219–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dominguez-Folgueras, M. and Castro-Martin, T. (2013). Cohabitation in Spain: No longer a marginal path to family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(2): 422–437.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. (2001). Pattern classification. New York: Wiley.

Download reference:

Easterlin, R. (1980). Birth and fortune. New York: Basic Books.

Download reference:

Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., and Leese, M. (2001). Cluster analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H., Cabaço, S.L.F., and Emery, T. (2018). Generations and gender survey study profile. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 9(4): 456–465.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Generations and Gender Programme (2019). Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) – Wave 1. DANS.

Download reference:

Harbord, R.M. and Higgins, J.P.T. (2008). Meta-regression in Stata. The Stata Journal 8(4): 493–519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harris, R., Bradburn, M., Deeks, J., Harbord, R.M., Altman, D., and Sterne, J. (2008). Metan: Fixed-and random-effects meta-analysis. The Stata Journal 8(1): 3–28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. (2014). The different meanings of cohabitation across Europe: How cohabiters view their unions and differ in their plans and behaviors. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Social Sciences, Sociology.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Higgins, J.P.T., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., and Altman, D.G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 327(7414): 557–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 27(3): 269–293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mills, M. and Blossfeld, H.P. (2013). The second demographic transition meets globalization: A comprehensive theory to understand changes in family formation in an era of rising uncertainty. In: Evans, A. and Baxter, J. (eds.). Negotiating the life course. Stability and change in life pathways. Dordrecht: Springer: 9–33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mooyaart, J.E. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2016). The influence of parental education on timing and type of union formation: Changes over the life course and over time in the Netherlands. Demography 53(4): 885–919.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mulder, C.H., Clark, W.A.V., and Wagner, M. (2006). Resources, living arrangements and first union formation in the United States, the Netherlands and West Germany. European Journal of Population 22(1): 3–35.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gassen, N.S. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories: Manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.R. and Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(2): 357–376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raley, R.K., Sweeney, M.M., and Wondra, D. (2015). The growing racial and ethnic divide in US marriage patterns. The Future of Children/Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation 25(2): 89.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schröder, H. and Ganzeboom, H.B.G. (2014). Measuring and modeling education levels in European societies. European Sociological Review 30(1): 119–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Shavit, Y. and Blossfeld, H.P. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.

Download reference:

Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 171–224.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J. (2001). The variable effects of family background on the timing of first marriage: United States, 1969–1993. Social Science Research 30(4): 606–626.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., and Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Uecker, J.E. and Stokes, C.E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(4): 835–846.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van de Kaa, D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review 27: 290–331.

Download reference:

Wiik, K.A. (2009). You’d better wait. Socio-economic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation. European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zaidi, B. and Morgan, S.P. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology 43: 473–492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article

Volume
Page
Volume
Article ID