Volume 47 - Article 26 | Pages 793–842  

Spatial heterogeneity in son preference across India’s 640 districts: An application of small-area estimation

By Abhishek Singh, Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Kaushalendra Kumar, Ashish Singh, Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Sabu S. Padmadas

References

In: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

Download reference:

Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Aksan, A.M. (2021). Son preference and the fertility squeeze in India. Journal of Demographic Economics 87(1): 67–106.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alkema, L., Chao, F., You, D., Pedersen, J., and Cheryl, C.S. (2014). National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: A systematic assessment. Lancet Global Health 2(9): 521–530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amoako Johnson, F., Chandra, H., Brown, J. J., and Padmadas, S.S. (2010). Estimating district-level births attended by skilled attendants in Ghana using demographic health survey and census data: An application of small area estimation technique. Journal of Official Statistics 26(2): 341–359.

Download reference:

Amoako Johnson, F., Padmadas, S.S., Chandra, H., Matthews, Z., and Madise, N.J. (2012). Estimating unmet need for contraception by district within Ghana: An application of small-area estimation techniques. Population Studies 66(2): 105–122.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(4): 151–174.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, S. (2003). Why dowry payments declined with modernization in Europe but are rising in India. Journal of Political Economy 111(2): 269–310.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, S. (2007). Why the marriage squeeze cannot cause dowry inflation. Journal of Economic Theory 137(1): 140–152.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis 27(2): 93–115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arnold, F. (1997). Gender preference for children. Calverton, Maryland: Macro International, DHS Comparative Studies 23.

Download reference:

Arnold, F. (1992). Sex preference and its demographic and health implications. International Family Planning Perspectives 18(3): 93–101.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arnold, F., Kim Choe, M., and Roy, T.K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies 52(3): 301–315.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arnold, F., Kishor, S., and Roy, T.K. (2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review 28(4): 759–785.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arokiasamy, P. (2002). Gender preference, contraceptive use and fertility in India: Regional and developmental dummies. International Journal of Population Geography 8(1): 49–67.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baffour, B., Chandra, H., and Martinez, A. (2019). Localised estimates of dynamics of multi-dimensional disadvantage: An application of the small area estimation technique using Australian survey and census data. International Statistical Review 87(1): 1–23.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Basu, A.M. (1989). Is discrimination in food really necessary for explaining sex differentials in childhood mortality? Population Studies 43(2): 193–210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bharati, S., Shome, S., Pal, M., Chaudhury, P., and Bharati, P. (2011). Is son preference pervasive in India? Journal of Gender Studies 20(3): 291–298.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhat, P.N.M. and Francis Zavier, A.J. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography 40(4): 637–657.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhat, P.N.M. and Halli, S.S. (1999). Demography of brideprice and dowry: Causes and consequences of the Indian marriage squeeze. Population Studies 53(2): 129–148.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhattacharya, P.C. (2006). Economic development, gender inequality, and demographic outcomes: evidence from India. Population and Development Review 32(2): 263–291.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhutia, Y. and Liarakou, G. (2018). Gender and nature in the matrilineal society of Meghalaya, India: Searching for ecofeminist perspectives. The Journal of Environmental Education 49(4): 328–335.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bloomfield, M. (1897). Sacred Books of the East. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C., Reddy, P.H., and Caldwell, P. (1989). The causes of demographic change: Experimental research in South India. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Download reference:

Centre for Development Studies (2005). Human development report 2005. Thiruvananthapuram: Government of Kerala.

Download reference:

Chakraborty, T. and Kim, S. (2010). Kinship institutions and sex ratios in India. Demography 47(4): 989–1012.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chandra, H., Chambers, R., and Salvati, N. (2019). Small area estimation of survey weighted counts under aggregated level spatial model. Survey Methodology 45(1): 31–59.

Download reference:

Chao, F., Guilmoto, C.Z., K.C, S., and Ombao, H. (2020). Probabilistic projection of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births by state and union territory in India. PLOS ONE 15(8): e0236673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chaudhuri, S. (2012). The desire for sons and excess fertility: a household-level analysis of parity progression in India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(4): 178–186.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India. Demography 37(1): 95–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., and Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in east and south Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies 40(2): 153–187.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis Jr, D.R. (2010). The spirit of Hindu law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dharmalingam, A. (1996). The social context of family size preferences and fertility behaviour in a south Indian village. Genus 52(1–2): 83–103.

Download reference:

Dyson, T. and Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review 9(1): 35–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Echavarri, R.A. and Ezcurra, R. (2010). Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India. Demography 47(1): 249–268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gaudin, S. (2011). Son preference in Indian families: absolute versus relative wealth effects. Demography 48(1): 343–370.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guha, S. and Chandra, H. (2021). Measuring disaggregate level food insecurity via multivariate small area modelling: Evidence from rural districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Food Security 13(3): 597–615.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guillot, M. (2002). The dynamics of the population sex ratio in India, 1971–96. Population Studies 56(1): 51–63.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guilmoto, C.Z., Saikia, N., Tamrakar, V., and Bora, J. (2018). Excess under-5 female mortality across India: A spatial analysis using 2011 census data. The Lancet Global Health 6(6): 650–658.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guo, Z., Das Gupta, M., and Li, S. (2016). Missing girls’ in China and India: Trends and policy challenges. Asian Population Studies 12(2): 135–155.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jeffrey, R. (1992). Politics, women, and well-being: How Kerala became ‘A Model’. Cambridge: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jeyaseelan, V., Kumar, S., Jeyaseelan, L., Shankar, V., Yadav, B.K., and Bangdiwala, S.I. (2015). Dowry demand and harassment: prevalence and risk factors in India. Journal of Biosocial Science 47(6): 727–745.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kapadia, K.M. (1966). Marriage and family in India. Bombay: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Karve, I. (1965). Kinship organization in India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

Download reference:

Kashyap, R. (2019). Is prenatal sex selection associated with lower female child mortality? Population Studies 73(1): 57–78.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kashyap, R. and Behrman, J. (2020). Gender discrimination and excess female under-5 mortality in India: A new perspective using mixed-sex twins. Demography 57(6): 2143–2167.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kashyap, R. and Villavicencio, F. (2016). The dynamics of son preference, technology diffusion, and fertility decline underlying distorted sex ratios at birth: a simulation approach. Demography 53(5): 1261–1281.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., and Kishor, S. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy, and development in India. Population and Development Review 21(2): 281–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mamdani, M. (1972). The myth of population control. London: Monthly Review Press.

Download reference:

McDougal, L., Shakya, H., Dehingia, N., Lapsansky, C., Conrad, D., Bhan, N., Singh, A., McDougal, T.L., and Raj, A. (2020). Mapping the patchwork: Exploring the subnational heterogeneity of child marriage in India. SSM-Population Health 12(100688): 1–12.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mendez‐Luck, C.A., Yu, H., Meng, Y.Y., Jhawar, M., and Wallace, S.P. (2007). Estimating health conditions for small areas: Asthma symptom prevalence for state legislative districts. Health Services Research 42(6 Pt 2): 2389–2409.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, B.D. (1991). The endangered sex: The neglect of female children in rural North India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Download reference:

Mishra, V., Roy, T.K., and Retherford, R.D. (2004). Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care, and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review 30(2): 269–295.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mitra, A. (2014). Son preference in India: Implications for gender development. Journal of Economic Issues 48(4): 1021–1037.

Download reference:

Murthi, M., Guio, A.C., and Dreze, J. (1995). Mortality, fertility, and gender bias in India: A district-level analysis. Population and Development Review 21(4): 745–782.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India (2020). Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2020. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India.

Download reference:

Oldenburg, P. (1992). Sex ratio, son preference and violence in India: A research note. Economic and Political Weekly 27(49 and 50): 2657–2662.

Download reference:

Pande, R.P. (2003). Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography 40(3): 395–418.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pande, R.P. and Astone, N.M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: The independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review 26(1): 1–29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pande, R.P. and Yazbeck, A.S. (2003). What’s in a country average? Wealth, gender and regional inequalities in immunization in India. Social Science and Medicine 57(11): 2075–2088.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Patel, A.B., Badhoniya, N., Mamtani, M., and Kulkarni, H. (2013). Skewed sex ratios in India: “Physician, heal thyself”. Demography 50(3): 1129–1134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfeffermann, D. (2002). Small area estimation: New developments and directions. International Statistical Review 70(1): 125–143.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfeffermann, D. and Sverchkov, M. (2007). Small-area estimation under informative probability sampling of areas and within the selected areas. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102(480): 1427–1439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pillai, M.S. (2016). Ivory throne: Chronicles of the House of Travancore. Australia: Harper Collins.

Download reference:

Pratesi, M. and Salvati, N. (2008). Small area estimation: The EBLUP estimator based on spatially correlated random area effects. Statistical Methods and Applications 17: 113–141.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Radkar, A. (2018). Is son preference weakening? Economic and Political Weekly 24(53): 101–106.

Download reference:

Rao, J.N.K. (2003). Small area estimation. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rao, J.N.K. and Isabel, M. (2015). Small area estimation. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Retheesh Babu, G. and Veerraju Babu, B. (2011). Dowry deaths: A neglected public health issue in India. International Health 3(1): 35–43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Robitaille, M.C. (2013). Determinants of stated son preference in India: Are men and women different? The Journal of Development Studies 49(5): 657–669.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Robitaille, M.C. and Chatterjee, I. (2018). Sex-selective abortions and infant mortality in India: The role of parents’ stated son preference. The Journal of Development Studies 54(1): 47–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roy, A. (2018). Discord in matrilineality: Insight into the khasi society in Meghalaya. Society and Culture in South Asia 4(2): 278–297.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Saei, A. and Chambers, R. (2003). Small area estimation: A review of methods based on the application of mixed models. Southampton: Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, S3RI Methodology Working Papers M03/16.

Download reference:

Saikia, N., Meh, C., Ram, U., Bora, J.K., Mishra, B., Chandra, S., and Jha, P. (2021). Trends in missing females at birth in India from 1981 to 2016: Analyses of 2.1 million birth histories in nationally representative surveys. The Lancet Global Health 9(6): e813–e821.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Chokhandre, P., Singh, A.K., Barker, K.M., Kumar, K., McDougal, L., James, K.S., and Raj, A. (2021). Development of India patriarchy index: Validation and testing of temporal and spatial patterning. Social Indicators Research 159(1): 351–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Kumar, K., Pathak, P.K., Chauhan, R., and Banerjee, A. (2017). Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Fertility in India. Population (E 72(3): 505–526.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Kumar, K., Yadav, A.K., James, K.S., McDougal, L., Atmavilas, Y., and Raj, A. (2021). Factors influencing the sex ratio at birth in India: A new analysis based on births occurring between 2005 and 2016. Studies in Family Planning 52(1): 41–58.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Ram, F., and Ranjan, R. (2007). Couples reproductive intentions in two culturally contrasting states of northeastern India. Demography India 36(1): 39–53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Srivastava, S., Chandra, H., Singh, S.K., and Upadhyay, A.K. (2021). Mapping changes in district level prevalence of childhood stunting in India 1998–2016: An application of small area estimation techniques. SSM-Population Health 14(100748): 1–9.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Srivastava, S., Chauhan, S., Patel, R., Marbaniang, S.P., Kumar, P., Paul, R., and Dhillon, P. (2021). Banned by law, practiced by the society: The study of factors associated with dowry payments among adolescent girls in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, India. PLOS ONE 16(10): e0258656.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Subba, T.B. and Ghosh, G.C. (2003). The anthropology of north east India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.

Download reference:

Vanneman, R., Desai, S., and Vikram, K. (2012). Son preference in India. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America (PAA), San Francisco, May 3–5, 2012.

Download reference:

Vlassoff, C. (1990). The value of sons in an Indian village: how widows see it. Population Studies 44(1): 5–20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article