Volume 48 - Article 14 | Pages 373–386  

A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland

By Marika Jalovaara, Linus Andersson

References

Andersson, G., Thomson, E., and Duntava, A. (2017). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research 37(35): 1081–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2016). A happy ending to a half-century of family change? Population and Development Review 42(1): 121–129.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eickmeyer, K.J. (2022). Age variation in the first marriage rate, 1990 and 2017. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research, FP-19-05; Family Profiles.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Härkönen, J. and Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review 22(5): 501–517.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J., and Myrskylä, M. (2020). All-time low period fertility in Finland: Demographic drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications. Population Studies 74(3): 315–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Illouz, E. (2013). Why love hurts: a sociological explanation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Andersson, L. (2022). A register-based account of period trends in partnership prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland. SocArXiv.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M., Andersson, L., and Miettinen, A. (2022). Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners. Population Studies 76(1): 119–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review 34(5): 486–500.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2013). The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries. Demography 50(4): 1499–1520.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 27(3): 269–293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M. (2016). Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context. Social Forces 95(1): 251–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Lichter, D.T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 35–61.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J. and Schwartz, C.R. (2020). The demography of families: A review of patterns and change. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 9–34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 27–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2021). Cohabitation in the life course. In: Oxford International handbook of social policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., Spielauer, M., and Prskawetz, A. (2012). Union instability as an engine of fertility? A microsimulation model for France. Demography 49(1): 175–195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

UNESCO (2012). International standard classification of education: ISCED. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics Montreal.

Download reference:

Wood, J., Neels, K., and Kil, T. (2014). The educational gradient of childlessness and cohort parity progression in 14 low fertility countries. Demographic Research 31(46): 1365–1416.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article