Volume 48 - Article 8 | Pages 203–232  

The sex preference for children in Europe: Children’s sex and the probability and timing of births

By Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, Magdalena Grabowska

References

Aghajanova, L. (2012). Sex selection for nonhealth-related reasons. Virtual Mentor 14(2): 105–111.

Amico, M. and Van Keilegom, I. (2018). Cure models in survival analysis. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 5(1): 311–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M., and Vikat, A. (2006). Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography 43(2): 255–267.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Angrist, J.D. and Evans, W.N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. The American Economic Review 88(3): 450–477.

Download reference:

Balbo, N., Billari, F.C., and Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: Un examen des recherches. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 29(1): 1–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bartus, T., Murinkó, L., Szalma, I., and Szél, B. (2013). The effect of education on second births in Hungary: A test of the time-squeeze, self-selection and partner-effect hypotheses. Demographic Research 28(1): 1–32.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. and Solaz, A. (2013). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 29(1): 39–67.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bertrand, M. and Pan, J. (2013). The trouble with boys: Social influences and the gender gap in disruptive behavior. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(1): 32–64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., Brummund, P., Cook, J., and Larson-Koester, M. (2020). Is there still son preference in the United States? Journal of Population Economics 33(3): 709–750.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bremhorst, V., Kreyenfeld, M., and Lambert, P. (2016). Fertility progression in Germany: An analysis using flexible nonparametric cure survival models. Demographic Research 35(18): 505–534.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brockmann, H. (2001). Girls preferred? Changing patterns of sex preferences in the two German States. European Sociological Review 17(2): 189–202.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chao, F., Gerland, P., Cook, A.R., and Alkema, L. (2019). Systematic assessment of the sex ratio at birth for all countries and estimation of national imbalances and regional reference levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(19): 9303–9311.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chao, F., Guilmoto, C.Z., K.C, S., and Ombao, H. (2020). Probabilistic projection of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births by State and Union Territory in India. PLOS ONE 15(8): e0236673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dahl, G.B. and Moretti, E. (2008). The demand for sons. Review of Economic Studies 75(4): 1085–1120.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ezdi, S. and Bas, A.M. (2020). Gender preferences and fertility: Investigating the case of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Demographic Research 43(3): 59–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gray, E., Evans, A., Anderson, J., and Kippen, R. (2010). Using split-population models to examine predictors of the probability and timing of parity progression. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 26(3): 275–295.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. (2010). State care provision, societal opinion and children’s care of older parents in 11 European countries. Ageing and Society 30(2): 299–323.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hank, K. and Kohler, H.P. (2000). Gender preferences for children in Europe: Empirical results from 17 FFS countries. Demographic Research 2(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hank, K. and Kohler, H.P. (2003). Sex preferences for children revisited: New evidence from Germany. Population 58(1): 131–133.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kane, E.W. (2012). The gender trap: Parents and the pitfalls of raising boys and girls. New York and London: NYU Press.

Download reference:

Kemkes, A. (2006). Does the sex of firstborn children influence subsequent fertility behavior? Evidence from family reconstitution. Journal of Family History 31(2): 144–162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kippen, R., Gray, E., and Evans, A. (2018). High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia. Reproductive Health 15(1): 134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lambert, P.C. (2007). Modeling of the cure fraction in survival studies. The Stata Journal 7(3): 351–375.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Li, L. and Choe, M.K. (1997). A mixture model for duration data: Analysis of second births in China. Demography 34(2): 189–197.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lundberg, S. (2005). Sons, daugthers, and parental behaviour. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21(3): 340–356.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milazzo, A. (2014). Son preference, fertility and family structure: Evidence from reproductive behavior among Nigerian women. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 6869.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mills, M. and Begall, K. (2010). Preferences for the sex-composition of children in Europe: A multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child. Population Studies 64(1): 77–95.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Myck, M., Oczkowska, M., and Wowczko, I. (2021). Gender preferences in Central and Eastern Europe as reflected in partnership and fertility outcomes. Bonn: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, IZA Discussion Paper 14244.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Owens, J. (2016). Early childhood behavior problems and the gender gap in educational attainment in the United States. Sociology of Education 89(3): 236–258.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M.R., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories: Manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research , MPIDR Working Paper WP-2010-011.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Saarela, J. and Finnäs, F. (2014). Sex composition of children, parental separation, and parity progression: Is Finland a Nordic outlier? Demographic Research 30(2): 49–70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schröder, J., Schmiedeberg, C., and Brüderl, J. (2016). Beyond the two-child family: Factors affecting second and third birth rates in West Germany. Journal of Family Research 28(1): 3–18.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Varga, M. (2014). The effect of education, family size, unemployment and childcare availability on birth stopping and timing. Portuguese Economic Journal 13(2): 95–115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Woods, L.M., Rachet, B., Lambert, P.C., and Coleman, M.P. (2009). Cure’ from breast cancer among two populations of women followed for 23 years after diagnosis. Annals of Oncology 20(8): 1331–1336.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Xu, K.Q. (2019). Changing patterns and determinants of first marriage over the history of the People’s Republic of China. Population 74(3): 205–235.

Download reference:

Yamaguchi, K. and Ferguson, L.R. (1995). The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: Rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. American Sociological Review 60(2): 272–298.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article