Volume 49 - Article 20 | Pages 513–542  

Religion and union dissolution: Effects of couple and municipal religiosity on divorce and separation

By Willem R. J. Vermeulen, Mioara Zoutewelle-Terovan, Niels Kooiman, Aart C. Liefbroer

References

Adamczyk, A. (2013). The effect of personal religiosity on attitudes toward abortion, divorce, and gender equality-does cultural context make a difference? EurAmerica 43(1): 213‒253.

Download reference:

Afifi, T.D., Davis, S., Denes, A., and Merrill, A. (2013). Analyzing divorce from cultural and network approaches. Journal of Family Studies 19(3): 240‒253.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Allison, P.D. (2014). Discrete-time methods. In: Allison, P.D. (ed.). Event history and survival analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Research Methods: 7‒18.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bakker, B.F., Van Rooijen, J., and Van Toor, L. (2014). The system of social statistical datasets of Statistics Netherlands: An integral approach to the production of register-based social statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS 30(4): 411‒424.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berghammer, C. (2012). Family life trajectories and religiosity in Austria. European Sociological Review 28(1): 127‒144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L., Sweet, J.A., and Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 913‒927.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Call, V.R. and Heaton, T.B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36(3): 382‒392.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2020). Degrees of change: An assessment of the deinstitutionalization of marriage thesis. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 62‒80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Graaf, A. and Loozen, S. (2009). Religie en Demografisch Gedrag. In: Schmeets, H. and Bie, R. (eds.). Religie aan het Begin van de 21ste Eeuw. Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. : 27‒34.

Download reference:

De Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (1999). Verschillen in Echtscheidingscijfers tussen Nederlandse Gemeenten. Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking (November): 15‒24.

Download reference:

De Jong, A. (2000). Ongehuwd samenwonen in tien jaar verdubbeld [electronic resource. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Dekker, G. and Peters, J. (1989). Gereformeerden in Meervoud. Kampen: Uitgeversmaatschappij J. H. Kok.

Download reference:

Esteve, A., Lesthaeghe, R., and López-Gay, A. (2012). The Latin American Cohabitation Boom, 1970‒2007. Population and Development Review 38(1): 55‒81.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Farr, R.H. and Goldberg, A.E. (2018). Same-sex relationship dissolution and divorce: How will children be affected? In: Goldberg, A.E. and Romero, A.P. (eds.). LGBTQ divorce and relationship dissolution: Psychological and legal perspectives and implications for practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 151‒172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Galster, G.C. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In: Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., and Maclennan, D. (eds.). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. New York: Springer: 23‒56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Glass, J. and Levchak, P. (2014). Red States, Blue States, and divorce: Understanding the impact of conservative Protestantism on regional variation in divorce rates. American Journal of Sociology 119(4): 1002‒1046.

Weblink:
Download reference:

González-Val, R. and Marcén, M. (2018). Unemployment, marriage and divorce. Applied Economics 50(13): 1495‒1508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heisig, J.P. and Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review 35(2): 258‒279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. (2014). The different meanings of cohabitation across Europe: How cohabiters view their union and differ in their plans and behaviors. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A.R. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population 30: 391‒410.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Wagner, M. (2020). Individualized relationship practices and union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation. European Sociological Review 36(6): 868‒885.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Janssen, J.P.G. (2002). Do opposites attract divorce? Dimensions of mixed marriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 395‒421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M., De Graaf, P.M., and Janssen, J.P.G. (2005). Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: The effects of differences in religion and in nationality, 1974–94. Population Studies 59(1): 71‒85.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K.E. and Mensah, F.K. (2010). Partnership trajectories, parent and child well-being. In: Hansen, J.P., Joshi, H., and Dex, S. (eds.). Children of the 21st century. Bristol: The Policy Press: 77‒94.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. (2012). Spatial variation in divorce and separation: Compositional or contextual effects? Population, Space and Place 18(1): 1‒15.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kuyper, L. (2018). Opvattingen Over Seksuele en Genderdiversiteit in Nederland en Europa. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

Download reference:

Lambert, Y. (1999). Religion in modernity as a new axial age: Secularization or new religious forms? Sociology of Religion 60(3): 303‒333.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lehrer, E.L. and Chiswick, C.U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography 30(3): 385‒404.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211‒251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lewis, R.A. and Spanier, G.B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In: Burr, W.R., Hill, R., Nye, F.I., and Reiss, I.L. (eds.). Contemporary theories about the family: Research-based theories. New York: Free Press: 268‒294.

Download reference:

Li, S., Kubzansky, L.D., and VanderWeele, T.J. (2018). Religious service attendance, divorce, and remarriage among U.S. nurses in mid and late life. PloS ONE 13(12): e0207778.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203‒221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Rijken, A.J. (2019). The association between christianity and marriage attitudes in Europe. Does religious context matter? European Sociological Review 35(3): 363‒379.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. (2013). Trends in cohabitation: Over twenty years of change, 1987‒2010. Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research, Family Profile, FP-13-12.

Download reference:

Manning, W.D. (2020). Young Adulthood Relationships in an Era of Uncertainty: A Case for Cohabitation. Demography 57: 799‒819.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014). Regional disparities in divorce rates within one country: The case of Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Sociology 40(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schmeets, H. (2016). De Religieuze Kaart van Nederland 2010‒2015. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Schröder, H. and Ganzeboom, H.B. (2014). Measuring and modelling level of education in European societies. European Sociological Review 30(1): 119‒136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Berghammer, C. (2021). Demography of family change in Europe. In: Schneider, N.F. and Kreyenfeld, M. (eds.). Research handbook on the sociology of the family. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 162‒186.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85‒138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J. and Lloyd, K.M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review 60(1): 21‒35.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J., Trent, K., and Shen, Y. (2001). Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural‐opportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(3): 743‒754.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Netherlands (2015). Dutch Labour Force Survey. San Francisco: Internet Archive.

Statistics Netherlands (2020). Huishoudens; Personen Naar Geslacht, Leeftijd en Regio, 1 januari. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Statistics Netherlands (2021). Huwen en Huwelijksontbinding; Geslacht, Leeftijd (31 december), Regio. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Statistics Netherlands (2020). Ontwikkelingen in Religieuze Betrokkenheid. In: Religie in Nederland. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Statistics Netherlands (2020). Personen in Huishoudens naar Leeftijd en Geslacht, 1 januari. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Statistics Netherlands (2020). Regionale Kerncijfers Nederland. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Statistics Netherlands (2015). Religie en Kerkbezoek Naar Gemeente 2010‒2014. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands, The Hague / Heerlen.

Statistics Netherlands (2019). Stedelijkheid. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

te Riele, S. (2019). Opvattingen Over Trouwen, Samenwonen en Scheiden. The Hague / Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.

Thibaut, J.W. and Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Download reference:

Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 873‒893.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. (1985). Changing attitudes toward separation and divorce: Causes and consequences. American Journal of Sociology 90(4): 856‒872.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Toulemon, L. (1997). Cohabitation is here to stay. Population: An English Selection 9: 11‒46.

Download reference:

Trent, K. and South, S.J. (1989). Structural determinants of the divorce rate: A cross-societal analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51(2): 391‒404.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Udry, J. R. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family 43(4): 889‒897.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vaaler, M.L., Ellison, C.G., and Powers, D.A. (2009). Religious influences on the risk of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(4): 917‒934.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Gaalen, R., Houdt, K., and Poortman, A.R. (2019). Trouwen, kinderen krijgen en (echt)scheiden naar opleidingsniveau. The Hague / Heerlen, Statistische Trends.

Download reference:

Vermeulen, W.R.J., Zoutewelle‐Terovan, M., Kooiman, N., and Liefbroer, A.C. (2023). Comparing marriage and cohabitation dissolution risks across municipalities: Which characteristics matter? Population, Space and Place 29(5): 60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wang, Z., Graaff, T., and Nijkamp, P. (2016). Cultural diversity and cultural distance as choice determinants of migration destination. Spatial Economic Analysis 11(2): 176‒200.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wilkins‐Laflamme, S. (2016). Secularization and the wider gap in values and personal religiosity between the religious and nonreligious. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55(4): 717‒736.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yarhouse, M.A. and Nowacki, S.K. (2007). The many meanings of marriage: Divergent perspectives seeking common ground. The Family Journal 15(1): 36‒45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yu, J. and Xie, Y. (2015). Cohabitation in China: Trends and determinants. Population and Development Review 41(4): 607‒628.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article