Volume 52 - Article 7 | Pages 179–228  

The changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics and fertility trends in Europe and the United States: A review

By Bernice Kuang, Ann Berrington, Sindhu Vasireddy, Hill Kulu

References

Aassve, A. (2003). The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young American women. Demography 40(1): 105–126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, K.G. (2011). Does paying child support reduce men’s subsequent marriage and fertility? Evolution and Human Behavior 32(2): 90–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G. (1997). The impact of children on divorce risks of Swedish women. European Journal of Population 13(2): 109–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L.B., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K., and Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research 20(14): 313–352.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, L. (2023). A novel macro perspective on family dynamics: The contribution of partnership contexts of births to cohort fertility rates. Population and Development Review 49(3): 617–649.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, L. (2021). Partnerships and fertility: Trends and conjectures. Paper presented at the What happened to Nordic fertility, Finland, 3 February 2021.

Download reference:

Andersson, L. (2023). The role of gender differences in partnering and re-partnering for gender differences in completed fertility. Population Research and Policy Review 42(2): 17.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, L., Jalovaara, M., Uggla, C., and Saarela, J. (2022). Less is more? Repartnering and completed cohort fertility in Finland. Demography 59(6): 2321–2339.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andreasson, J., Tarrant, A., Johansson, T., and Ladlow, L. (2023). Perceptions of gender equality and engaged fatherhood among young fathers: parenthood and the welfare state in Sweden and the UK. Families, Relationships and Societies 12(3): 323–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andreev, E.M., Churilova, E., and Jasilioniene, A. (2022). Partnership context of first births in Russia: The enduring significance of marriage. European Journal of Population 38(1): 37–58.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 19(2): 147–169.

Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment 25(6): 531–561.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Balbo, N., Billari, F., and Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population 29: 1–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baranowska-Rataj, A. (2014). What would your parents say? The impact of cohabitation among young people on their relationships with their parents. Journal of Happiness Studies 15(6): 1313–1332.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baranowska-Rataj, A., Mynarska, M., and Vignoli, D. (2014). A dirty look from the neighbors. Does living in a religious neighborhood prevent cohabitation? Warsaw: Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics, Working Papers 71.

Download reference:

Beaujouan, É (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research 17(2): 69–80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É (2010). Séparations, nouvelles unions: Quelles influences sur la fécondité? Population et Sociétés 464(2): 1–4.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. (2020). Latest-late fertility? Decline and resurgence of late parenthood across the low-fertility countries. Population and Development Review 46(2): 219–247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. and Solaz, A. (2012). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E., Zeman, K., and Nathan, M. (2023). Delayed first births and completed fertility across the 1940–1969 birth cohorts. Demographic Research 48(15): 387–420.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berg, V., Miettinen, A., Jokela, M., and Rotkirch, A. (2020). Shorter birth intervals between siblings are associated with increased risk of parental divorce. PloS One 15(1): 0228237–0228237.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berghammer, C. (2012). Family life trajectories and religiosity in Austria. European Sociological Review 28(1): 127–144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., and Hart, R.K. (2021). Can policies stall the fertility fall? A systematic review of the (quasi-) experimental literature. Population and Development Review 47(4): 913–964.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2017). Childlessness in the UK. In: Kreyenfeld, M. and Konietzka, D. (eds.). Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences. Cham: Springer: 57–76.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2020). Expectations for family transitions in young adulthood among the UK second generation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(5): 913–935.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. and Diamond, I. (1999). Marital dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort: The role of cohabitation. Population Studies 53(1): 19–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A., Perelli-Harris, B., and Trevena, P. (2015). Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK. Demographic Research 33(12): 327–362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. and Stone, J. (2017). Understanding third and fourth births in Britain: What role do increased immigration and multiple partnerships play? Southampton: University of Southampton, Centre for Population Change Working Paper Series.

Download reference:

Billingsley, S. (2010). The post-Communist fertility puzzle. Population Research and Policy Review 29(2): 193–231.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Boissonneault, M. and Beer, J. (2022). Microsimulation of household and marital transitions leading to childlessness among Dutch women born between 1971 and 2000. Demography 59(1): 137–160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bolano, D. and Vignoli, D. (2021). Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty. Demographic Research 45(5): 141–186.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review 4(1): 105–132.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2015). Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up. Demographic Research 33(19): 535–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L., Manning, W.D., and Stykes, J.B. (2015). Family structure and child well-being: Integrating family complexity. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(1): 177–190.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buber-Ennser, I. and Prskawetz, A. (2000). Fertility in second unions in Austria: Findings from the Austrian FFS. Demographic Research 3(2).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carioli, A. and Sironi, E. (2020). Does union formation change attitudes towards childbearing in Bulgaria? A propensity score analysis. Advances in Life Course Research 46(100356).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Castro, R. (2015). Late-entry-into-motherhood women are responsible for fertility recuperation. Journal of Biosocial Science 47(2): 275–279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cavanagh, S.E. and Fomby, P. (2019). Family instability in the lives of American children. Annual Review of Sociology 45(1): 493–513.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (2008). Multiple partnerships and children’s wellbeing. Family Matters 80: 33–36.

Download reference:

Churilova, E., Zakharov, S., Puur, A., Rahnu, L., and Sakkeus, L. (2017). Childbearing after repartnering among Russians, Russians migrants and Estonians: Prevalence and determinants. SSRN Electronic Journal .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coleman, D.A. and Dubuc, S. (2010). The fertility of ethnic minorities in the UK, 1960s–2006. Population Studies 64(1): 19–41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Compans, M.C., Beaujouan, E., and Dutreuilh, C. (2022). From union formation to first birth: The role of age at first cohabitation in the transition to motherhood and fatherhood. Population 77(3): 411–436.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coppola, L. and Di Cesare, M. (2008). How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain. Demographic Research 18(4): 117–144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Valk, H.A.G. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). Parental influence on union formation preferences among Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 38(4): 487–505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Delaporte, I. and Kulu, H. (2023). Interaction between childbearing and partnership trajectories among immigrants and their descendants in France: An application of multichannel sequence analysis. Population Studies 77(1): 55–70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Nallo, A. (2019). Gender gap in repartnering: The role of parental status and custodial arrangements. Journal of Marriage and Family 81(1): 59–78.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Nallo, A., Ivanova, K., and Balbo, N. (2023). Repartnering of women in the United States: The interplay between motherhood and socio-economic status. Population Studies 77(3): 399–416.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2011). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Eggebeen, D. and Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family 71(1): 108–121.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P., Wu, L.L., and Shafer, E.F. (2013). Cohort trends in premarital first births: What role for the retreat from marriage? Demography 50(6): 2075–2104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ermisch, J. and Pevalin, D.J. (2005). Early motherhood and later partnerships. Journal of Population Economics 18(3): 469–489.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity.

Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. and Billari, F.C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evans, R., Scourfield, J., and Moore, G. (2014). Gender, relationship breakdown, and suicide risk: A review of research in western countries. Journal of Family Issues 37(16): 2239–2264.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., and Graham, E. (2017). Choosing to remain childless? A comparative study of fertility intentions among women and men in Italy and Britain. European Journal of Population 33(3): 319–350.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fostik, A., Fernández Soto, M., Ruiz-Vallejo, F., and Ciganda, D. (2023). Union Instability and Fertility: An International Perspective. European Journal of Population 39(1): 25.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Frejka, T. (2012). The role of contemporary childbearing postponement and recuperation in shaping period fertility trends. Comparative Population Studies 36(4).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gałęzewska, P., Perelli-Harris, B., and Berrington, A. (2017). Cross-national differences in women’s repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics. Demographic Research 37(8): 189–228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C. (2011). Mothers but not wives: The increasing lag between nonmarital births and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 73(1): 264–278.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C.M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 146–160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C.M., Ananat, E.O., and Gassman-Pines, A. (2016). Midpregnancy marriage and divorce: Why the death of shotgun marriage has been greatly exaggerated. Demography 53(6): 1693–1715.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and intimacy in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.

Download reference:

Giguère, B., Lalonde, R., and Lou, E. (2010). Living at the crossroads of cultural worlds: The experience of normative conflicts by second generation immigrant youth. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(1): 14–29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ginther, D.K., Grasdal, A.L., and R.A, Pollak (2022). Fathers’ multiple-partner fertility and children’s educational outcomes. Demography 59(1): 389–415.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldberg, J.S. and Carlson, M.J. (2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior in stable married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 762–777.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Golombok, S. (2015). Modern families: Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Groepler, N., Huinink, J., and Peter, T. (2021). Does the birth of a child still prompt a marriage? A comparison of Austria, France, Germany and Hungary. European Societies 23(3): 333–359.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grogger, J. and Bronars, S.G. (2001). The effect of welfare payments on the marriage and fertility behavior of unwed mothers: Results from a twins experiment. Journal of Political Economy 109(3): 529–545.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzman, L., Wildsmith, E., Manlove, J., and Franzetta, K. (2010). Unintended births: Patterns by race and ethnicity and relationship type. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 42(3): 176–185.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. (2018). Marriage and dissolution among women’s cohabitations: Variations by stepfamily status and shared childbearing. Journal of Family Issues 39(4): 1108–1136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 66–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Furstenberg, F.F. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography 44(3): 583–601.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S.R. (2020). Pathways to parenthood in social and family contexts: Decade in review, 2020. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 117–144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review 8(3): 449–494.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hannemann, T. and Kulu, H. (2015). Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom. Demographic Research 33(10): 273–312.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hannemann, T., Kulu, H., González-Ferrer, A., Pailhé, A., Rahnu, L., and Puur, A. (2020). Partnership dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in four European countries. Population, Space and Place 26(5): 2315.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hărăgus, M. (2015). From cohabitation to marriage when a child is on the way: A comparison of three former socialist countries: Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 46(3): 329–350.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harknett, K. and McLanahan, S.S. (2004). Racial and ethnic differences in marriage after the birth of a child. American Sociological Review 69(6): 790–811.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., and Boertien, D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population 33(2): 163–184.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harrison, J., Kulu, H., Keenan, K.L., and Sullivan, F. (2023). Union formation and fertility amongst immigrants from Pakistan and their descendants in the United Kingdom: A multichannel sequence analysis. Demographic Research 48(10): 271–320.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hart, R.K. (2019). Union histories of dissolution: What can they say about childlessness? European Journal of Population 35(1): 101–131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. (2013). Marriage (still) matters: The contribution of demographic change to trends in childlessness in the United States. Demography 50(5): 1641–1661.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heaton, T.B., Jacobson, C.K., and Holland, K. (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(2): 531–539.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J., and Myrskylä, M. (2022). Less partnering, less children, or both? Analysis of the drivers of first birth decline in Finland since 2010. European Journal of Population 38(2): 191–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 489–505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Wagner, M. (2020). Individualized relationship practices and union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation. European Sociological Review 36(6): 868–885.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies 65(1): 115–128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2014). Fertility after repartnering in the Netherlands: Parenthood or commitment? Advances in Life Course Research 21: 101–112.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context / L’impact des enfants sur les chances d’une nouvelle union pour les hommes et pour les femmes dans un contexte européen. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 29(4): 417–444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M., Andersson, L., and Miettinen, A. (2021). Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners. Population Studies 76(1): 119–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Fasang, A.E. (2017). From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness. Demographic Research 36(55): 1703–1720.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2020). Childbearing across partnerships in Finland and Germany. In: Mortelmans, D. (ed.). Divorce in Europe: New insights in trends, causes and consequences of relation break-ups. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 315–335.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review 34(5): 486–500.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jefferies, J., Berrington, A., and Diamond, I. (2000). Childbearing following marital dissolution in Britain. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 16(3): 193–210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jejeebhoy, S.J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behaviour: Experiences from developing countries. Oxford: Clardendon Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jena, A.B., Goldman, D.P., and Joyce, G. (2011). Association between the birth of twins and parental divorce. Obstetrics and Gynecology 117(4): 892–897.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jónsson, A.K. (2021). A nation of bastards? Registered cohabitation, childbearing, and first-marriage formation in Iceland, 1994–2013. European Journal of Population 37(1): 65–95.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and Gelissen, J. (2007). The impact of recohabitation on fertility: Evidence from life history data in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 38(4): 555–574.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and Leopold, T. (2020). A new look at the separation surge in Europe: Contrasting adult and child perspectives. American Sociological Review 86(1): 1–34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Keizer, R., Dykstra, P.A., and Jansen, M.D. (2008). Pathways into childlessness: Evidence of gendered life course dynamics. Journal of Biosocial Science 40(6): 863–878.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klärner, A. (2015). The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany – social norms and the role of peoples’ perceptions of the past. Demographic Research S17(9): 239–272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klüsener, S. (2015). Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: Recent trends, persistence of the past, and potential future pathways. The History of the Family 20(4): 593–628.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Knab, J., Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S., Moiduddin, E., and Osborne, C. (2009). The effects of welfare and child support policies on the incidence of marriage following a nonmarital birth. In: Ziliak, J. P. (ed.). Welfare reform and its long-term consequences for America’s poor. .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, Ø and Rindfuss, R.R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M., Geisler, E., Castro Martín, T., Hannemann, T., Heintz-Martin, V., Jalovaara, M., Kulu, H., Meggiolaro, S., Mortelmans, P.D., Pasteels, I., Seiz, M., and Solaz, A. (2017). Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe. Demographic Research S21(37): 1245–1274.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. (2014). Marriage duration and divorce: The seven-year itch or a lifelong itch? Demography 51(3): 881–893.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. and Hannemann, T. (2016). Why does fertility remain high among certain UK-born ethnic minority women? Demographic Research 35(49): 1441–1488.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H., Hannemann, T., Pailhé, A., Neels, K., Krapf, S., González-Ferrer, A., and Andersson, G. (2017). Fertility by birth order among the descendants of immigrants in selected European countries. Population and Development Review 43(1): 31–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H., Milewski, N., Hannemann, T., and Mikolai, J. (2019). A decade of life-course research on fertility of immigrants and their descendants in Europe. Demographic Research 40(46): 1345–1374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T., Klüsener, S., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Social norms, economic conditions and spatial variation of childbearing within cohabitation across Europe. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, MPIDR working paper WP-2014-002.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Le Goff, J.M. (2002). Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage. Demographic Research 7(18): 593–624.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lehrer, E.L. (2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 30(4): 707–726.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Kaa, D.J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In: Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J. (eds.). Bevolking: Groei en Krimp (Population: Growth and decline). Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus: 9–24.

Download reference:

Lewis, J. and Kiernan, K. (1996). The boundaries between marriage, nonmarriage, and parenthood: Changes in behavior and policy in postwar Britain. Journal of Family History 21(3): 372–387.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Rijken, A.J. (2019). The association between Christianity and marriage attitudes in Europe: Does religious context matter? European Sociological Review 35(3): 363–379.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lillard, L.A. and Panis, C.W.A. (1996). Marital status and mortality: The role of health. Demography 33(3): 313–327.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lillard, L.A. and Waite, L.J. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography 30(4): 653–681.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liu, G. (2002). How premarital children and childbearing in current marriage influence divorce of Swedish women in their first marriages. Demographic Research 7(10): 389–406.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lutz, W. and Kc, S. (2011). Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science 333(6042): 587–592.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lyngstad, T. and Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research 23(10): 257–292.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manlove, J., Wildsmith, E., Ikramullah, E., Ryan, S., Holcombe, E., Scott, M., and Peterson, K. (2012). Union transitions following the birth of a child to cohabiting parents. Population Research and Policy Review 31(3): 361–386.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives 33(5): 217–223.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(3): 674–689.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2010). The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research 23(34): 963–996.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J. (2017). Partnership histories and the transition to motherhood in later reproductive ages in Europe. Population 72(1): 123–154.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J., Berrington, A., and Perelli-Harris, B. (2018). The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 39(27): 753–794.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J. and Kulu, H. (2023). Partnership and fertility trajectories of immigrants and descendants in the United Kingdom: A multilevel multistate event history approach. Population Studies 77(3): 359–378.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research 17(29): 859–896.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. (1993). The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: A challenge to the conventional view. Population Studies 47(2): 221–243.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process. Demographic Research 16(9): 249–286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Michelmore, K. (2015). Change in the stability of marital and cohabiting unions following the birth of a child. Demography 52(5): 1463–1485.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Michelmore, K. (2018). Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children. Demography 55(4): 1389–1421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mynarska, M., Matysiak, A., Rybińska, A., Tocchioni, V., and Vignoli, D. (2015). Diverse paths into childlessness over the life course. Advances in Life Course Research 25: 35–48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Neyer, G. (2013). Welfare states, family policies, and fertility in Europe. In: Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Kulu, H., Bernardi, L., and Bühler, C. (eds.). The demography of Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nishikido, M., Cui, Q., and Esteve, A. (2022). Partnership dynamics and the fertility gap between Sweden and Spain. Genus 78(1): 26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nitsche, N. and Hayford, S.R. (2020). Preferences, partners, and parenthood: Linking early fertility desires, marriage timing, and achieved fertility. Demography 57(6): 1975–2001.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pagnini, D.L. and Rindfuss, R.R. (1993). The divorce of marriage and childbearing: Changing attitudes and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 19(2): 331–347.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Palumbo, L., Berrington, A., Eibich, P., and Vitali, A. (2023). Uncertain steps into adulthood: Does economic precariousness hinder entry into the first co-residential partnership in the UK? Population Studies 77(2): 263–289.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Parker, E., Sassler, S., and Tach, L. (2020). Fatherhood and racial/ethnic differences in the progression of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 83(4): 985–1003.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pelikh, A., Mikolai, J., and Kulu, H. (2022). Make up or break up? Partnership transitions among young adults in England and Wales. Advances in Life Course Research 52: 100475.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pelikh, A., Remes, H., Metsä-Simola, N., and Goisis, A. (2023). Partnership trajectories preceding medically assisted reproduction. Population Studies 78(2): 341–360.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gassen, N.S. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Peri-Rotem, N. (2016). Religion and fertility in Western Europe: Trends across cohorts in Britain, France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population 32(2): 231–265.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. and Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 5: 271–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pirani, E. and Vignoli, D. (2023). Childbearing across partnerships in Italy: Prevalence, demographic correlates, and social gradient. Population Studies 77(3): 379–398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pollak, R.A. and Watkins, S.C. (1993). Cultural and Economic Approaches to Fertility: Proper Marriage or Mesalliance? Population and Development Review 19(3): 467–496.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raab, M. and Struffolino, E. (2020). The Heterogeneity of Partnership Trajectories to Childlessness in Germany. European Journal of Population 36(1): 53–70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rahnu, L. and Jalovaara, M. (2023). Partnership dynamics and entry into parenthood: Comparison of Finnish birth cohorts 1969–2000. Advances in Life Course Research 56: 100548.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rahnu, L., Puur, A., Sakkeus, L., and Klesment, M. (2015). Partnership dynamics among migrants and their descendants in Estonia. Demographic Research 32(56): 1519–1566.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raley, R.K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the united states? Demography 38(1): 59–66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raley, R.K. and Sweeney, M.M. (2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 81–99.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raybould, A. and Sear, R. (2021). Children of the (gender) revolution: A theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility. Population Studies 75(2): 169–190.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reher, D.S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Remes, H., Palma Carvajal, M., Peltonen, R., Martikainen, P., and Goisis, A. (2022). The well-being of adolescents conceived through medically assisted reproduction: A population-level and within-family analysis. European Journal of Population 38(5): 915–949.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rutigliano, R. and Esping-Andersen, G. (2018). Partnership choice and childbearing in Norway and Spain. European Journal of Population 34(3): 367–386.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Saarela, J. and Skirbekk, V. (2020). Childlessness and union histories: Evidence from Finnish population register data. Journal of Biosocial Science 52(1): 78–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Lichter, D.T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 35–61.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schnor, C., Pasteels, I., and Van Bavel, J. (2017). Sole physical custody and mother’s repartnering after divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(3): 879–890.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Shulz, S. (2022). Different trends in marriage and fertility behavior for Roman Catholics, German Protestants, and women without religious affiliation in West Germany: An analysis of five birth cohorts based on the German General Social Survey. Socius 8: 1–3.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J., Manning, W.D., and Porter, M. (2005). Everything’s there except money’: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680–696.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. (2011). Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989: Collapse and gradual recovery. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36(2): 246–296.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. (2015). Low fertility in Austria and the Czech Republic: Gradual policy adjustments. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers 2.

Download reference:

Sobotka, T. (2002). Ten years of rapid fertility changes in the European post-communist countries. Groningen: PRC, University of Groningen, Population Research Centre, Research Reports.

Download reference:

Sobotka, T., Št’astná, A., Zeman, K., Hamplová, D., and Kantorová, V. (2008). Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism. Demographic Research 19(14): 403–454.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spéder, Z. and Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 25(4): 503–523.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Joshi, H., Kallis, C., and Goldstein, H. (2006). Changing compatibility of cohabitation and childbearing between young British women born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies 60(2): 137–152.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., and Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography 42(4): 647–673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stone, L. (2023). Ultra-Orthodox fertility and marriage in the United States: Evidence from the American Community Survey. Demographic Research 49(29): 769–782.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sturm, N., Koops, J.C., and Rutigliano, R. (2023). The influence of partnership status on fertility intentions of childless women and men across European countries. European Journal of Population 39(20).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Surkyn, J. and Lestaeghe, R. (2004). Values orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research S3(3): 45–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. and Raley, R.K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 539–558.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 245–258.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2004). Step-families and childbearing desires in Europe. Demographic Research S3(5): 117–134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography 51(2): 485–508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., and Hill, D.H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 628–651.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. and Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population 25(2): 123–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tocchioni, V., Rybińska, A., Mynarska, M., Matysiak, A., and Vignoli, D. (2022). Life-course trajectories of childless women: Country-specific or universal? European Journal of Population 38(5): 1315–1332.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Todesco, L. (2011). A matter of number, age or marriage? Children and marital dissolution in Italy. Population Research and Policy Review 30(2): 313–332.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Upchurch, D.M., Lillard, L.A., and Panis, C.W.A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography 39(2): 311–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Bavel, J. and Reher, D.S. (2013). The baby boom and its causes: What we know and what we need to know. Population and Development Review 39(2): 257–288.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Landschoot, L., Valk, H.A.G., and Van Bavel, J. (2017). Fertility among descendants of immigrants in Belgium: The role of the partner. Demographic Research 36(60): 1827–1858.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., Matthijs, K., and Swicegood, G. (2015). Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: Differences according to parental status and custodial arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review 34(5): 761–784.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vasireddy, S., Berrington, A., Kuang, B., and Kulu, H. (2023). Education and fertility: A review of recent research in Europe. Comparative Population Studies 48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D. and Salvini, S. (2014). Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition. Demographic Research 31(35): 1079–1106.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Tocchioni, V., and Mattei, A. (2020). The impact of job uncertainty on first-birth postponement. Advances in Life Course Research 45: 100308.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Tocchioni, V., and Salvini, S. (2016). Uncertain lives Insights into the role of job precariousness in union formation in Italy. Demographic Research 35(10): 253–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vikat, A., Thomson, E., and Hoem, J.M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies 53(2): 211–225.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vitali, A., Aassve, A., and Lappegård, T. (2015). Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation. Demography 52(2): 355–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wagner, M., Huinink, J., and Liefbroer, A.C. (2019). Running out of time? Understanding the consequences of the biological clock for the dynamics of fertility intentions and union formation. Demographic Research 40(1): 1–26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Walke, R. (2002). Twins or two single children: The influence of the multiplicity of the first birth on the divorce risk of Swedish women. Demographic Research 7(9): 379–389.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. (1986). Fertility in the United States. Science 234(4776): 554–559.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Winkler-Dworak, M., Beaujouan, E., Di Giulio, P., and Spielauer, M. (2017). Union instability and fertility: A microsimulation model for Italy and Great Britain. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers.

Download reference:

Wu, L. and Martin, S. (2002). Is there an engine of nonmarital fertility? Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, CDE Working Paper 2002-14.

Download reference:

Zimmermann, O. (2021). Is early partnership formation instrumental for fertility in Germany? Influences of fertility orientations on partnership transitions. Comparative Population Studies 46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article