Volume 53 - Article 11 | Pages 307–324  

Attitudes toward child well-being in diverse families across Europe

By Anne Solaz, Anne-Right Poortman, Dimitri Mortelmans, Laura Bernardi, Anja Steinbach

Abstract

Background: European families have diversified, with more children raised in single-parent, step-parent, and same-sex parent families. Whereas child outcomes in these families are well-studied, societal attitudes toward family diversity remain underexplored.

Objective: This study examines (1) perceptions of child well-being in nontraditional families compared to traditional ones, (2) their variation by family types in terms of structure and composition, and (3) sociodemographic and international differences in these attitudes across Europe.

Methods: We used the “Attitudes toward family diversity” module from the European Social Survey CRONOS-2 online panel study (2022) across 11 countries. We analysed responses on perceptions of child well-being in six family types relatively to traditional families: single mother, single father, stepmother, stepfather, gay male parents, and lesbian parents. Distributions were explored by country, gender, age, education, and income quintiles.

Results: Generally, nontraditional families were perceived as less favourable to children’s well-being than traditional ones. However, whereas over two-thirds view child well-being growing up in stepfamilies and same-sex families as comparable to child well-being in traditional families, positive attitudes vary widely, from 40% in Central and Eastern Europe to 85% in Nordic countries. Single-parent families received less approval. Women and younger individuals showed more favourable attitudes to nontraditional families. Lower socioeconomic respondents had less favourable attitudes toward same-sex families, but they are more open toward lone parenthood.

Conclusions: Attitudes toward nontraditional families’ ability to guarantee, as traditional families, children’s well-being vary across Europe. Stepfamilies and same-sex families receive higher approval than single-parent families. Two-adult forms are preferred to one-adult families. Sociodemographic factors shape these views.

Contribution: This study is one of the first to systematically compare attitudes on family diversity for children’s well-being across Europe, offering new insights into the relative importance of parental gender, the number of parents, biological relatedness, and gender composition of parents.

Author’s Affiliation

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
Volume 37 - Article 37

Endogamy and relationship dissolution: Does unmarried cohabitation matter?
Volume 47 - Article 17

‘Will the one who keeps the children keep the house?’ Residential mobility after divorce by parenthood status and custody arrangements in France
Volume 40 - Article 14

Co-ethnic marriage versus intermarriage among immigrants and their descendants: A comparison across seven European countries using event-history analysis
Volume 39 - Article 17

Joint lifestyles and the risk of union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation
Volume 39 - Article 15

Mixed marriages in Switzerland: A test of the segmented assimilation hypothesis
Volume 38 - Article 48

First and second births among immigrants and their descendants in Switzerland
Volume 38 - Article 11

Editorial for Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective
Volume 37 - Article 2

The timing of parenthood and its effect on social contact and support
Volume 36 - Article 62

The socioeconomic determinants of repartnering after divorce or separation in Belgium
Volume 36 - Article 58

Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to Special Collection: "Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia"
Volume 33 - Article 25

Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe
Volume 32 - Article 8

Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective
Volume 30 - Article 55

Social networks and fertility
Volume 30 - Article 22

The intermediate effect of geographic proximity on intergenerational support: A comparison of France and Bulgaria
Volume 27 - Article 17

The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect?
Volume 26 - Article 1

Preface to the Rostock Debate on Demographic Change
Volume 24 - Article 6

The anthropological demography of Europe
Volume 17 - Article 18

Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course
Volume 17 - Article 14

Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

The surge in living alone among young and middle-aged adults: A decomposition analysis of the rise in one-person households in Germany, 1991 to 2021
Volume 52 - Article 32    | Keywords: algebraic decomposition, East Germany, gender, housing, middle adulthood, one-person households, social structures, solo living, West Germany, young adulthood

How do fathers and mothers allocate their leisure time? Patterns and inequalities across 13 European countries
Volume 52 - Article 31    | Keywords: Europe, gender inequalities, parents, space-time dynamics, time use

Demographic convergence in marriage timing: Intersecting gender and educational expansion
Volume 52 - Article 14    | Keywords: age at marriage, convergence, cross-country, education, gender, union formation

Job creation, job destruction, and fertility in Germany
Volume 52 - Article 13    | Keywords: fertility, gender, Germany, job creation, job destruction, labor market, spatial modelling, unemployment

Gender differences in routine housework among one-person households: A cross-national analysis
Volume 52 - Article 12    | Keywords: cross-national research, gender, housework, unipersonal households