Volume 53 - Article 16 | Pages 465–510  

The partnership context of first parenthood – and how it varies by parental class and birth cohort in the United Kingdom

By Alessandro Di Nallo

References

Aassve, A. (2003). The impact of economic resources on premarital childbearing and subsequent marriage among young american women. Demography 40(1): 105–126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P.R., Booth, A., McHale, S.M., and Van Hook, J. (eds.) (2015). Families in an era of increasing inequality. Cham: Springer International Publishing (National Symposium on Family Issues).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P.R., Landale, N.S., Havasevich-Brooks, T.C., Booth, A., Eggebeen, D.J., Schoen, R., and McHale, S.M. (2008). Precursors of young women’s family formation pathways. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(5): 1271–1286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K., and Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the nordic countries. Demographic Research 20(14): 313–352.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The Intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review 58(2): 233–246.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1992). The influence of parental resources on the timing of the transition to marriage. Social Science Research 21(3): 261–285.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers’ preferences for family and nonfamily behavior. Social Forces 79(1): 319–348.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research 30(2): 219–247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. and Bhrolcháin, M.N. (2011). Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends 145: 1–25.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: Bureau, Universities-National (ed.). Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Columbia University Press: 209–240.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1993). Human capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berghammer, C., Matysiak, A., Lyngstad, T.H., and Rinesi, F. (2024). Is single parenthood increasingly an experience of less-educated mothers? A European comparison over five decades. Demographic Research 51(34): 1059–1094.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. and Diamond, I. (2000). Marriage or cohabitation: A competing risks analysis of first‐partnership formation among the 1958 British birth cohort. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 163(2): 127–151.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A., Perelli-Harris, B., and Trevena, P. (2015). Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage. Demographic Research 33(12): 327–362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C., Hiekel, N., and Liefbroer, A.C. (2019). The social stratification of choice in the transition to adulthood. European Sociological Review 35(5): 599–615.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blau, P.M. and Duncan, O.D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society 9(3): 275–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Breen, R. and Jonsson, J.O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology 31(1): 223–243.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brons, M.D.A., Liefbroer, A.C., and Ganzeboom, H.B.G. (2017). Parental socio-economic status and first union formation: Can European variation be explained by the Second Demographic Transition theory? European Sociological Review 33(6): 809–822.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buis, M.L. (2013). The composition of family background: The influence of the economic and cultural resources of both parents on the offspring’s educational attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991. European Sociological Review 29(3): 593–602.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bukodi, E. (2012). The relationship between work history and partnership formation in cohorts of British men born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies 66(2): 123–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L. and Raley, R.K. (1995). Redefining single-parent families: Cohabitation and changing family reality. Demography 32(1): 97–109.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bynner, J. (2001). British youth transitions in comparative perspective. Journal of Youth Studies 4(1): 5–23.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bynner, J. (2005). Rethinking the youth phase of the life-course: The case for Emerging Adulthood? Journal of Youth Studies 8(4): 367–384.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bynner, J., Elias, P., McNight, A., Pan, H., and Pierre, G. (2002). Young people’s changing routes to independence. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Carlson, M.J. and Berger, L.M. (2013). What kids get from parents: Packages of parental involvement across complex family forms. Social Service Review 87(2): 213–49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlson, M.J., McLanahan, S.S., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Coparenting and nonresident fathers’ involvement with young children after a nonmarital birth. Demography 45(2): 461–488.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlson, M.J., VanOrman, A.G., and Pilkauskas, N.V. (2013). Examining the antecedents of U.S. nonmarital fatherhood. Demography 50(4): 1421–1447.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cavalli, A. and Galland, O. (1995). Youth in Europe. London and New York: Pinter.

Download reference:

Chan, T.W. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review 72(4): 512–532.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chan, T.W. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (2004). Is there a status order in contemporary British society? Evidence from the occupational structure of friendship. European Sociological Review 20(5): 383–401.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A., Cross-Barnet, C., Burton, L.M., and Garrett-Peters, R. (2008). Promises they can keep: Low-income women’s attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(4): 919–933.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coffield, F. (1995). Always the trainee, never the employee? Increasingly protracted transitions in the UK. In: Cavalli, A. and Galland, O. (eds.). Youth in Europe. London and New York: Pinter: 45–62.

Download reference:

Côté, J. (2002). The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualization thesis examined. Journal of Youth Studies 5(2): 117–134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Côté, J. and Bynner, J.M. (2008). Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies 11(3): 251–268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coulter, R. and Hu, Y. (2017). Living apart together and cohabitation intentions in Great Britain. Journal of Family Issues 38(12): 1701–1729.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dahlberg, J. (2015). Social background and becoming a parent in Sweden: A register-based study of the effect of social background on childbearing in Sweden. European Journal of Population 31: 417–444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Valk, H.A.G. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). Timing preferences for women’s family-life transitions: Intergenerational transmission among migrants and Dutch. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(1): 190–206.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duncan, G.J., Yeung, W.J., Brooks-Gunn, J., and Smith, J.R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? American Sociological Review 63(3): 406–423.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Easterlin, R. (1980). Birth and fortune. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 23(3): 225–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P., McClintock, E., and Shafer, E. (2011). Birth control use and early, unintended births: Evidence for a class gradient. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology 18(4): 500–514.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992). Individual or family? Results from two approaches to class assignment. Acta Sociologica 35(2): 96–105.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ermisch, J. (2023). The recent decline in period fertility in England and Wales: Differences associated with family background and intergenerational educational mobility. Population Studies 78(2): 325–339.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ermisch, J. and Francesconi, M. (2000). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Not for long, but here to stay. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 163(2): 153–171.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ermisch, J. and Francesconi, M. (1996). Partnership formation and dissolution in Great Britain. Colchester: Economic and Social Research Council Centre on Micro-social Change, University of Essex, Working Paper 96–10.

Download reference:

Farkas, G. (2003). Cognitive Skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology 29: 541–62.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fomby, P. and Bosick, S.J. (2013). Family instability and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(5): 1266–1287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Geyer, S., Hemström, Ö, Peter, R., and Vågerö, D. (2006). Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60(9): 804–810.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Goldscheider, F.K., Kaufman, G., and Sassler, S. (2009). Navigating the “new” marriage market: How attitudes toward partner characteristics shape union formation. Journal of Family Issues 30(6): 719–737.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F.K. and Waite, L.J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 91–109.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldthorpe, J.H. and McKnight, A. (2006). The economic basis of social class. In: Morgan, S., Grusky, D.B., and Fields, G.S. (eds.). Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research from sociology and economics. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 109–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haskey, J. (2005). Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: Having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT). Population Trends 122: 35–45.

Download reference:

Haveman, R. and Wolfe, B. (1993). Children’s prospects and children’s policy: How, in fact, are children faring? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4): 153–174.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J.M., and Furstenberg Jr, F.F. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 489–505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hobcraft, J. (2008). The timing and partnership context of becoming a parent: Cohort and gender commonalities and differences in childhood antecendents. Demographic Research 19(34): 1281–1319.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hofferth, S. and Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography 47(2): 415–437.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Högnäs, R.S. and Carlson, M.J. (2012). Like parent, like child?’ The intergenerational transmission of nonmarital childbearing. Social Science Research 41(6): 1480–1494.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J.A. (2017). The timing of marriage vis-à-vis coresidence and childbearing in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 36(20): 609–626.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hynes, K., Joyner, K., Peters, H.E., and DeLeone, F.Y. (2008). The transition to early fatherhood: National estimates based on multiple surveys. Demographic Research 18(12): 337–376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jones, G. (2002). The youth divide: Diverging paths to adulthood. York: York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population 27(3): 269–293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Journal of Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: here to stay? European perspectives. In: Moynihan, D.P., Smeeding, T.M., and Rainwater, L. (eds.). The future of the family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. and Cherlin, A. (1999). Parental divorce and partnership dissolution in adulthood: Evidence from a British cohort study. Population Studies 53(1): 39–48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. and Hobcraft, J. (1997). Parental divorce during childhood: Age at first intercourse, partnership and parenthood. Population Studies 51(1): 41–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. and Smith, K. (2003). Unmarried parenthood: New insights from the Millennium Cohort Study. Population Trends 114: 26–33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koops, J.C., Liefbroer, A.C., and Gauthier, A.H. (2021). Having a child within a cohabiting union in Europe and North America: What is the role of parents’ socio‐economic status? Population, Space and Place 27(6): 1–15.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koops, J.C., Liefbroer, A.C., and Gauthier, A.H. (2021). Socio-economic differences in the prevalence of single motherhood in North America and Europe. European Journal of Population 37(4–5): 825–849.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koops, J.C., Liefbroer, A.C., and Gauthier, A.H. (2017). The influence of parental educational attainment on the partnership context at first birth in 16 Western societies. European Journal of Population 33(4): 533–557.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kuang, B., Berrington, A., Vasireddy, S., and Kulu, H. (2020). Twenty years of having babies across different countries of the UK: How has parents’ partnership status changed? Southampton: University of Southampton, Centre for Population Change Policy Briefing 56.

Download reference:

Lappegård, T., Klüsener, S., and Vignoli, D. (2018). Why are marriage and family formation increasingly disconnected across Europe? A multilevel perspective on existing theories. Population, Space and Place 24(2): 2088–2088.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1–45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (2002). New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Elzinga, C.H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of behavioural patterns: How similar are parents’ and children’s demographic trajectories? Advances in Life Course Research 17(1): 1–10.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well‐being in married and cohabiting parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 345–362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Cohen, J.A. (2015). Teenage cohabitation, marriage, and childbearing. Population Research and Policy Review 34(2): 161–177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Lichter, D.T. (1996). Parental cohabitation and children’s economic well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 58(4): 998–1010.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2009). Fragile families and the reproduction of poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 621(1): 111–131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. and Bumpass, L. (1988). Intergenerational consequences of family disruption intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 130–152.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. and Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 257–276.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. and Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Michael, R.T. and Tuma, N.B. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography 22(4): 515–544.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J., Berrington, A., and Perelli-Harris, B. (2018). The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 39(27): 753–794.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, B.C. (2002). Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. Journal of Sex Research 39(1): 22–26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Modell, J., Furstenberg, F.F., and Hershberg, T. (1976). Social change and transitions to adulthood in historical perspective. Journal of Family History 1(1): 7–32.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mooyaart, J.E. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2016). The influence of parental education on timing and type of union formation: Changes over the life course and over time in the Netherlands. Demography 53(4): 885–919.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mooyaart, J.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Billari, F. (2021). The changing relationship between socioeconomic background and family formation in four European countries. Population Studies 76(2): 235–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mulder, C.H., Smits, J., and Smits, C.H.M. (1999). First-time home-ownership of couples: The effect of inter-generational transmission. European Sociological Review 15(3): 323–337.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. (2000). The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960–95. Population Studies 54(1): 43–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 17(1): 75–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Mare, R.D. (2004). Family structure, intergenerational mobility, and the reproduction of poverty: Evidence for increasing polarization? Demography 41(4): 629–648.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Beaujouan, É. (2013). Education and cohabitation in Britain: A return to traditional patterns? Population and Development Review 39(3): 441–458.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oesch, D. (2006). Redrawing the class map: Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oesch, D. and Vigna, N. (2022). A decline in the social status of the working class? Conflicting evidence for 8 western countries, 1987–2017. Comparative Political Studies 55(7): 1130–1157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

ONS (2019).

ONS (2021).

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osgood, D.W., Ruth, G., Eccles, J.S., Jacobs, J.E., and Barber, B.L. (2005). Fast starters, parents without careers, educated partners, educated singles, working singles, and slow starters. In: On the frontier of adulthood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 320–355.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Palumbo, L., Berrington, A., Eibich, P., and Vitali, A. (2023). Uncertain steps into adulthood: Does economic precariousness hinder entry into the first co-residential partnership in the UK? Population Studies 77(2): 263–289.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pelikh, A., Mikolai, J., and Kulu, H. (2022). Make up or break up? Partnership transitions among young adults in England and Wales. Advances in Life Course Research 52: 100475–100475.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gassen, N.S. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gerber, T.P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography 48(1): 317–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies: A Journal of Demogrpahy 66(2): 167–182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M. (2016). Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context. Social Forces 95(1): 251–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli‐Harris, B., Sigle‐Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rendall, M.S., Clarke, L.H., Peters, E., Ranjit, N., and Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of male fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography 36(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R. and VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. (2005). Lone motherhood and socio-economic disadvantage: Insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence. The Sociological Review 53(1): 30–49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Goldscheider, F. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues 25(2): 139–166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schnor, C. (2015). Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability. Demographic Research 33(22): 611–652.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 921–928.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sigle-Rushton, W. (2008). England and Wales: Stable fertility and pronounced social status differences. Demographic Research 19(15): 455–502.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sironi, M., Barban, N., and Impicciatore, R. (2015). Parental social class and the transition to adulthood in Italy and the United States. Advances in Life Course Research 26: 89–104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

South, S.J. (2001). The variable effects of family background on the timing of first marriage: United States 1969–1993. Social Science Research 30(4): 606–626.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Goldstein, H., and Browne, W. (2004). A general multilevel multistate competing risks model for event history data, with an application to a study of contraceptive use dynamics. Statistical Modelling 4(2): 145–159.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steenhof, L. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherlands for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from municipal registers. Population Studies 62(1): 69–84.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Population Development Review 37(1): 57–87.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement): 290–331.

Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (2002). The idea of a second demographic transition in industrialized countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan, Japan, 29 January 2002.

Download reference:

van der Wiel, R., Mulder, C., and de Valk, H.A.G. (2020). From living apart to living together: Do children born before the current partnership matter? Comparative Population Studies 45: 115–142.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Winkle, Z. (2018). Family trajectories across time and space: Increasing complexity in family life courses in Europe? Demography 55(1): 135–164.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A. (2009). You’d better wait!’ – Socio-economic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation. European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Willis, R.J. (1999). A theory of out-of-wedlock childbearing. Journal of Political Economy 7(6): 34–64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Winkler-Dworak, M. and Toulemon, L. (2007). Gender differences in the transition to adulthood in France: Is there convergence over the recent period? European Journal of Population 23: 273–314.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, L.L. (1996). Effects of family instability, income, and income instability on the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review 61(3): 386–406.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, L.L. and Martinson, B.C. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review 58(2): 210–232.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zaidi, B. and Morgan, S.P. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology 43(1): 473–492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zimmermann, O. and Konietzka, D. (2018). Social disparities in destandardization: Changing family life course patterns in seven European countries. European Sociological Review 34(1): 64–78.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article