Volume 53 - Article 28 | Pages 915–936  

Mapping son preference in India, 2002–2021: Spatial patterns and trends using model-based small area estimation

By Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Abhishek Singh, Ashish Singh, Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Kaushalendra Kumar, Nikos Tzavidis, Sabu Padmadas

References

Aksan, A.M. (2021). Son preference and the fertility squeeze in India. Journal of Demographic Economics 87(1): 67–106.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alderman, H., Nguyen, P.H., Tran, L.M., and Menon, P. (2021). Trends and geographic variability in gender inequalities in child mortality and stunting in India, 2006–2016. Maternal and Child Nutrition 17(3): e13179.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alkema, L., Chao, F., You, D., Pedersen, J., and Cheryl, C.S. (2014). National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: A systematic assessment. The Lancet Global Health 2(9): e521–e530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis 27(2): 93–115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arnold, F. (1997). Gender preference for children. Calverton, MD: Macro International, DHS Comparative Studies 23.

Download reference:

Arnold, F., Kishor, S., and Roy, T.K. (2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review 28(4): 759–785.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barman, P. and Sahoo, H. (2021). Sex preference in India: Trends, patterns and determinants. Children and Youth Services Review 122: 105876.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhat, P.M. (2002). On the trail of missing Indian females: I. Search for clues. Economic and Political Weekly : 5105–5118.

Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review 39(2): 185–208.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chakraborty, T. and Kim, S. (2010). Kinship institutions and sex ratios in India. Demography 47(4): 989–1012.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chao, F., Guilmoto, C.Z., K.C, S., and Ombao, H. (2020). Probabilistic projection of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births by state and union territory in India. PLOS ONE 15(8): e0236673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chaudhuri, S. (2012). The desire for sons and excess fertility: A household-level analysis of parity progression in India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(4): 178–186.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chen, L., Sartore, L., Benecha, H., Bejleri, V., and Nandram, B. (2022). Smoothing county-level sampling variances to improve small area models’ outputs. Stats 5(3): 898–915.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography 37(1): 95–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Das Gupta, M. and Mari Bhat, P.N. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies 51(3): 307–315.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Diamond-Smith, N. and Bishai, D. (2015). Evidence of self-correction of child sex ratios in India: A district-level analysis of child sex ratios from 1981 to 2011. Demography 52: 641–666.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dyson, T. and Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review 9(1): 35–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Echavarri, R.A. and Ezcurra, R. (2010). Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India. Demography 47(1): 249–268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fay, R.E. and Herriot, R.A. (1979). Estimates of income for small places: An application of James–Stein procedures to census data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 269–277.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fors, H.C. and Lindskog, A. (2023). Son preference and education inequalities in India: The role of gender-biased fertility strategies and preferential treatment of boys. Journal of Population Economics 36: 1431–1460.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guilmoto, C.Z. (2012). Sex imbalances at birth: Current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok: UNFPA Asia and the Pacific Regional Office.

Download reference:

Guilmoto, C.Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review 35(3): 519–549.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guilmoto, C.Z., Saikia, N., Tamrakar, V., and Bora, J. (2018). Excess under-5 female mortality across India: A spatial analysis using 2011 census data. The Lancet Global Health 6(6): e650–e658.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guo, Z., Das Gupta, M., and Li, S. (2016). 'Missing girls’ in China and India: Trends and policy challenges. Asian Population Studies 12(2): 135–155.

Weblink:
Download reference:

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2006). District Level Household Survey (DLHS-2), 2002–2004: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

Download reference:

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2010). District Level Household Survey (DLHS-2), 2007–2008. Mumbai: IIPS.

Download reference:

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

Download reference:

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2019–21: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

Download reference:

Kashyap, R. (2019). Is prenatal sex selection associated with lower female child mortality? Population Studies 73(1): 57–78.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kashyap, R. and Behrman, J. (2020). Gender discrimination and excess female under-5 mortality in India: A new perspective using mixed-sex twins. Demography 57(6): 2143–2167.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kashyap, R. and Villavicencio, F. (2016). The dynamics of son preference, technology diffusion, and fertility decline underlying distorted sex ratios at birth: A simulation approach. Demography 53(5): 1261–1281.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreutzmann, A.K., Pannier, S., Rojas-Perilla, N., Schmid, T., Templ, M., and Tzavidis, N. (2019). The R package emdi for estimating and mapping regionally disaggregated indicators. Journal of Statistical Software 91(7): 1–33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., and Kishor, S. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy, and development in India. Population and Development Review 21(2): 281–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDougal, L., Shakya, H., Dehingia, N., Lapsansky, C., Conrad, D., Bhan, N., Singh, A., McDougal, T.L., and Raj, A. (2020). Mapping the patchwork: Exploring the subnational heterogeneity of child marriage in India. SSM–Population Health 12: 100688.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Patel, A.B., Badhoniya, N., Mamtani, M., and Kulkarni, H. (2013). Skewed sex ratios in India: “Physician, heal thyself". Demography 50(3): 1129–1134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfeffermann, D. (2002). Small area estimation: New developments and directions. International Statistical Review 70(1): 125–143.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfeffermann, D. and Di Maio, A. (2021). Model-based estimation using the msae R package: Univariate and multivariate Fay–Herriot models. The R Journal 13(1): 270–289.

Download reference:

Radkar, A. (2018). Is son preference weakening? Economic and Political Weekly 53(12): 101–106.

Download reference:

Rao, J.N.K. and Isabel, M. (2015). Small area estimation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Retherford, R.D. and Roy, T.K. (2003). Factors affecting sex-selective abortion in India and 17 major states. Mumbai: IIPS, NFHS Subject Report 21.

Download reference:

Robitaille, M.C. and Chatterjee, I. (2018). Sex-selective abortions and infant mortality in India: The role of parents’ stated son preference. The Journal of Development Studies 54(1): 47–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roy, T.K. and Ram, F. (2004). Comparability issues in large sample surveys-some observations. In: Roy, T.K., Guruswamy, M., and Arokiasamy, P. (eds.). Population, health and development in India: Changing perspectives. New Delhi: Rawat Publications: 40–56.

Download reference:

Saikia, N., Meh, C., Ram, U., Bora, J.K., Mishra, B., Chandra, S., and Jha, P. (2021). Trends in missing females at birth in India from 1981 to 2016: Analyses of 2.1 million birth histories in nationally representative surveys. The Lancet Global Health 9(6): 813–821.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Chokhandre, P., Singh, A.J., Barker, K.M., Kumar, K., McDougal, L., James, K.S., and Raj, A. (2021). Development of the India patriarchy index: Validation and testing of temporal and spatial patterning. Social Indicators Research 159: 351–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Gaurav, S., and Das, U. (2013). Household headship and academic skills of Indian children: A special focus on gender disparities. European Journal of Population 29: 445–466.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Ram, F., and Ranjan, R. (2007). Couples’ reproductive intentions in two culturally contrasting states of northeastern India. Demography India 36(1): 39–53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Singh, A., Upadhyay, A.K., Kumar, K., Singh, A., Johnson, F.A., and Padmadas, S.S. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity in son preference across India’s 640 districts. Demographic Research 47(26): 793–842.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Subba, T.B. and Ghosh, G.C. (2003). The anthropology of north east India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.

Download reference:

Tong, Y. (2022). India’s sex ratio at birth begins to normalize. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Download reference:

Vanneman, R., Desai, S., and Vikram, K. (2012). Son preference in India. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, USA, May 3–5, 2012.

Download reference:

Back to the article