Volume 53 - Article 29 | Pages 937–968  

Reassessing the U-shaped relationship between gender equality and fertility: A replication and extension of Kolk’s (2019) study using comprehensive gender equality measures

By Haohao Lei

References

Anderson, T. and Kohler, H.P. (2015). Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity. Population and Development Review 41(3): 381–407.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Begall, K. and Hiekel, N. (2025). Examining the gender equality–fertility paradox in three Nordic countries. Population and Development Review 51(2): 858–888.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bennett, F. (2021). Gendered economic inequalities: A social policy perspective. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities).

Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review 24(2): 271–291.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Sobotka, T. (2012). A demographic explanation for the recent rise in European fertility. Population and Development Review 38(1): 83–120.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C., Reddy, P.H., and Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies 37(3): 343–361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C.H., Lindberg, S.I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Borella, C., Cornell, A., Fish, M.S., Fox, L., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., God, A.G., Grahn, S., Hicken, A., Kinzelbach, K., Krusell, J., Marquardt, K.L., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Medzihorsky, J., Natsika, N., Neundorf, A., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Pernes, J., Rydén, O., von Römer, J., Seim, B., Sigman, R., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., Sundström, A., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., Wig, T., Wilson, S., and Ziblatt, D. (2024). V-Dem dataset v14. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project (V-Dem dataset v14. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.).

Download reference:

Dilli, S., Carmichael, S.G., and Rijpma, A. (2019). Introducing the historical gender equality index. Feminist Economics 25(1): 31–57.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duvander, A.Z. and Cedstrand, S. (2022). Gender equal parental leave use in Sweden: The success of the reserved months. In: Successful public policy in the Nordic Countries: Cases, lessons, challenges. Oxford: Oxford Academic: 263–283.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping‐Andersen, G. and Billari, F.C. (2015). Re‐theorising family demographics. Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Folbre, N. (1983). Of patriarchy born: The political economy of fertility decisions. Feminist Studies 9(2): 261–284.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behaviour. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R., Sobotka, T., and Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of “lowest-low” fertility? Population and Development Review 35(4): 663–699.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic transition theory. Population Studies 50(3): 361–387.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kishor, S. and Johnson, K. (2005). Profiling domestic violence: A multi-country study. Studies in Family Planning 36(3): 259–261.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kolk, M. (2019). Weak support for a U-shaped pattern between societal gender equality and fertility when comparing societies across time. Demographic Research 40(2): 27–48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(51): 18112–18115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of the Australian Population Association 17(1): 1–16.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H.P., and Billari, F.C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(7256): 741–743.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. and Kohler, H.P. (2001). Tempo effects in the fertility decline in Eastern Europe: Evidence from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Russia. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de démographie 17(1): 37–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. (1959). An appraisal of fertility trends in the United States. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, College Division.

Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. (1983). Cohort and period measures of changing fertility. In: Bulatao, R.A. and Lee, R.D. (eds.). Determinants of fertility in developing countries. New York: Academic Press: 737–756.

Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. (1956). Problems of trend determination during a transition in fertility. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 34(1): 5–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. (1964). The process of demographic translation. Demography 1(1): 74–82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trivers, R.L. (2017). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell, B.G. (ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man. London: Routledge: 136–179.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations (1995). Programme of action of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (Chapters I–VIII). Population and Development Review 21(1): 187–213.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations – Pathways to Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zhang, J. (2017). The evolution of China’s one-child policy and its effects on family outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1): 141–160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article