Volume 54 - Article 3 | Pages 71–86
Tracking the decline of first marriage in South Korea: Timing, quantum decline, and pandemic disruptions
By Sam Hyun Yoo
Abstract
Background: In South Korea, where most births occur within marriage, the country’s record-low fertility has put renewed attention on the long-term decline in first marriage. Despite rising policy and academic interest, systematic demographic analyses that disentangle structural and timing components of nuptiality change remain limited, especially in East Asia.
Objective: This study examines trends in the quantum and timing of first marriage in South Korea from 1993 to 2023 and assesses whether the decline reflects structural retreat, postponement, or both.
Methods: Using legally registered marriage data from the national vital statistics system, we construct three period indicators: the total first marriage rate (TFMR), the period proportion ever married (PPEM), and a tempo-adjusted PPEM (PPEM*). We estimate the never-married population using age-specific proportions from the census, applied to mid-year resident registration data. All indicators are calculated separately for men and women.
Results: Both TFMR and PPEM declined markedly over three decades. Among women, PPEM and PPEM* showed parallel trajectories, indicating a structural retreat from marriage. Among men, PPEM fluctuated more sharply, and its widening gap with PPEM* after 2015 reveals stronger tempo effects. The temporary convergence in 2020 reflects compositional change due to a sharp fall in international marriages during the pandemic.
Conclusions: The findings reveal a sustained decline in first marriage for both sexes, with men showing lower levels and greater sensitivity to timing shifts and external disruptions.
Contribution: By extending tempo-adjusted analysis to first marriage, this study offers new insights into nuptiality decline in East Asia’s ultra-low fertility context.
Author’s Affiliation
- Sam Hyun Yoo - Hanyang University, Korea, Republic of EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
The paradox of change: Religion and fertility decline in South Korea
Volume 44 - Article 23
Migration, legality, and fertility regulation: Abortion and contraception among migrants and natives in Russia
Volume 38 - Article 42
Ultra-low fertility in South Korea: The role of the tempo effect
Volume 38 - Article 22
Postponement and recuperation in cohort marriage: The experience of South Korea
Volume 35 - Article 35
Educational differentials in cohort fertility during the fertility transition in South Korea
Volume 30 - Article 53
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Gender disparities in death registration during the COVID-19 pandemic in an urban African setting
Volume 53 - Article 32
| Keywords:
Africa,
COVID-19,
CRVS systems,
death registration,
gender,
Guinea-Bissau,
low-and-middle-income countries
The partnership context of first parenthood – and how it varies by parental class and birth cohort in the United Kingdom
Volume 53 - Article 16
| Keywords:
cohabitation,
cohort analysis,
event history,
event history analysis,
family formation,
intergenerational inequality,
marriage,
parental socio-economic status,
parenthood,
single parenthood,
United Kingdom
Gendered labor market adjustments around marital and cohabiting union transitions during Europe’s early cohabitation diffusion
Volume 53 - Article 15
| Keywords:
adult equivalent household income,
cohabitation,
employment income,
gender inequalities,
hours worked,
intra-household specialization,
marriage,
union transitions
Where do we go from here? Partnership-parenthood trajectories of cohabitation as first union during young adulthood in the United States
Volume 53 - Article 9
| Keywords:
cohabitation,
family inequality,
fertility,
marriage,
race/ethnicity,
transition to adulthood,
union formation,
United States of America
Special times? How COVID-specific concerns disrupted fertility desires in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
Volume 53 - Article 3
| Keywords:
COVID-19,
COVID-19,
culture,
fertility desires,
mitigation policies
Cited References: 27
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar