Volume 55 - Article 12 | Pages 371–412  

The recent decline in women’s fertility intentions in Canada: The shift in the intention schedule and the puzzle for family policy

By Benoît Laplante, Julie Blouin

References

Baker, M., Messacar, D., and Stabile, M. (2023). Effects of child tax benefits on poverty and labor supply: Evidence from the Canada Child Benefit and Universal Child Care Benefit. Journal of Labor Economics 41(4): 1129–1182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Balbo, N., Billari, F., and Mills, M. (2012). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population 29(1): 1–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujot, R. and Muhammad, A. (2006). Transformed families and the basis for childbearing. In: McQuillan, K. and Ravanera, Z. (eds.). Canada’s changing families. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 15–48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujot, R. and Wang, J. (2010). Low fertility in Canada. The Nordic model in Quebec and the U.S. model in Alberta. Canadian Studies in Population 37(3/4): 411–443.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É and Berghammer, C. (2019). The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Population Research and Policy Review 38(4): 507–535.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement on Global fertility transition): 260–281 (on Global fertility transition): 260–281.).

Download reference:

Bouchet-Valat, M. and Toulemon, L. (2025). People in France want fewer children. Population and Societies 635.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Breton, D., Florian, S., and Tomkinson, J. (2025). More than 10 years of declining French fertility in the European context of low fertility. What recent census microdata tells us. Paper presented at the Session 18, Fertility trends and determinants in Europe, 30th International Population Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 13–18 June 2025.

Download reference:

Charles, E. (1948). The changing size of the family in Canada. Ottawa: Edmond Cloutier.

Download reference:

Charles, E. (1934). The twilight of parenthood. A biological study of the decline of population growth. London: Watts and Co.

Download reference:

Charton, L. (2009). Du désir d’enfant à la première et deuxième naissance. In: Régnier-Loilier, A. (ed.). Portraits de famille. L’enquête études des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles. Paris: Les éditions de l’INED: 365–396.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dandurand, R.B., Bernier, L., Lemieux, D., and Dulac, G. (1997). Le désir d’enfant. Du projet à la réalisation. Montréal: Institut national de la recherche scientifique – Culture et société.

Download reference:

Davis, K. (1937). Reproductive institutions and the pressure for population. The Sociological Review 29(3): 289–306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dupuis, D. (1998). What influences people’s plans to have children? Canadian Social Trends 48: 2–5.

Download reference:

Edmonston, B., Lee, S.M., and Wu, Z. (2010). Fertility intentions in Canada. Change or no change? Canadian Studies in Population 37(3/4): 297–337.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fahlén, S. and Oláh, L.S. (2018). Economic uncertainty and first-birth intentions in Europe. Demographic Research 39(28): 795–834.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fostik, A. and Galbraith, N. (2021). Changes in fertility intentions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, StatCan COVID‑19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada. Catalogue no. 45‑28‑0001.

Download reference:

Friedrich, C. and Bujard, M. (2025). Intended, ideal, and actual fertility in 11 European countries. Evidence on fertility gaps in different age groups from the Generations and Gender Survey. Wiesbaden: Federal Institute for Population Research, BiB.Working Paper 2/2025.

Download reference:

Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., and Testa, M.R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5/6): 479–496.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Golovina, K., Nitsche, N., Berg, V., Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., and Jokela, M. (2024). Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals. Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland. European Sociological Review 40(2): 326–341.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grégoire, E. (2014). Fertility decision-making. A Québec-specific analysis. Montreal: Concordia University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology.

Download reference:

Hagewen, K. and Morgan, P. (2005). Indented and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review 31(3): 507–527.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hartnett, C.S. and Gemmill, A. (2020). Recent trends in U.S. childbearing intentions. Demography 57(6): 2035–2045.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography 46(4): 765–783.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hays, J. (2025). U.S. adults in their 20s and 30s plan to have fewer children than in the past. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., and Sanderson, W.C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population 24(2): 129–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J., Miranda, V., Fallesen, P., Dommermuth, L., and Myrskylä, M. (2021). Not just later, but fewer: Novel trends in cohort fertility in the Nordic countries. Demography 58(4): 1373–1399.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Henripin, J. (1972). Trends and factors of fertility in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Download reference:

Houle, R. and Kubisch, K. (2025). Human fertility database documentation: Canada [electronic resource]. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.

Download reference:

Kearney, M.S. and Levine, P.B. (2025). Why is fertility so low in high income countries? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper 33989.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Laplante, B. (2024). Policy and fertility, a case study of the Quebec parental insurance plan. Population Research and Policy Review 43(39).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Le Bras, H. (1993). Marianne et les lapins. L’obsession démographique. Paris: Fayard.

Download reference:

Lefebvre, P. and Merrigan, P. (2008). Childcare policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: A natural experiment from Canada. Journal of Labor Economics 26(3): 519–548.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lemieux, D. and Bernier, L. (1993). La transmission intergénérationnelle dans les projets de procréation. Une approche qualitative et subjective des changements démographiques au Québec. Revue internationale d’études canadiennes / International Journal of Canadian Studies (Special Issue Winter): 85–102 (Special Issue (Winter): 85–102.).

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood. A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population 25(Special issue on Fertility intentions and outcomes): 363–386.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mance, H. (2024). Birth rates are falling in the Nordics. Are family-friendly policies no longer enough?

Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50(4): 370–396.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London and New York: Chapman and Hall.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs 120(2): 223–258.

Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9(Special issue on Reproductive decision-making): 75–98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. and Hagewen, K.J. (2005). Fertility. In: Poston, D.L. and Micklin, M. (eds.). Handbook of population. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum: 229–249.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Myrdal, A. (1941). Nation and family. The Swedish experiment in democratic family and population policy. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.

Download reference:

Myrdal, G. (1940). Population, a problem for democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Nelder, J.A. and Wedderburn, R.W.M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 135(3): 370–384.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M.N. and Beaujouan, É (2018). Do people have reproductive goals? Constructive preferences and the discovery of desired family size. In: Schoen, R. (ed.). Analytical family demography. Cham: Springer: 27–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pacaut, P. and Migneault, J. (2017). Un, deux, trois enfants ? Bientôt, plus tard, jamais? Les désirs et projets d’enfants des Québécoises. Quelle famille? 5(3): 1–12.

Download reference:

Pailhé, A., Rossier, C., and Toulemon, L. (2008). French family policy. Long tradition and diversified measures. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 6(Can policies enhance fertility in Europe?): 149–164.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Provencher, C. and Galbraith, N. (2024). Fertility in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Demographic Documents. Catalogue no. 91F0015M (91F0015M)).

Download reference:

Quesnel-Vallée, A. and Morgan, S.P. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the US. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5/6): 497–525.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ravanera, Z.R. and Beaujot, R. (2014). Childlessness of men in Canada: Result of a waiting game in a changing family context. Canadian Studies in Population 41(1–2): 38–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ray, C., Harcey, S., Greil, A., Tiemeyer, S., and McQuillan, J. (2018). Stability and change in personal fertility ideals among U.S. women in heterosexual relationships. Demographic Research 39(16): 459–486.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rotkirch, A. (2025). 20 ehdotusta lapsitoiveiden tukemiseksi, 2. korjattu painos [Twenty proposals to support the desire for parenthood]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

Download reference:

Rotkirch, A. and Miettinen, A. (2017). Childlessness in Finland. In: Kreyenfeld, M. and Konietzka, D. (eds.). Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences. Cham: Springer: 139–158.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rybińska, A. (2021). Trends in intentions to remain childless in the United States. Population Research and Policy Review 40(4): 661–672.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Savelieva, K., Jokela, M., and Rotkirch, A. (2023). Reasons to postpone childbearing during fertility decline in Finland. Marriage and Family Review 59(3): 253–276.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoen, R., Astone, N.M., Kim, Y.J., Nathanson, C.A., and Fields, J.M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(3): 790–799.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Beaujouan, É (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two‐child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., and Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Canada (2023). Crude birth rate, age-specific fertility rates and total fertility rate (live births), Table: 13-10-0418-01. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Download reference:

Statistics Canada (2019). General Social Survey: An overview. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 89F0115X-2019001.

Download reference:

Teng, T. and Margolis, R. (2024). Fertility decline in Canada since the Great Recession. Canadian Studies in Population 51: 7.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.R. (2012). Family sizes in Europe. Evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer survey. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, European Demographic Research Paper 2).

Download reference:

Thomson, E. (2015). Family size preferences. In: Wright, J.D. (ed.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edition, vol. 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 805–808.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1–59.

Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement ): 290–331.

Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., and Minello, A. (2020). A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework. Genus 76(28).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article