Volume 55 - Article 2 | Pages 43–72  

Educational competition and reduced family size in China

By Wei Lu, Yunxia Fan, Yi Wei

References

Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden. International Migration Review 38(2): 747–775.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. and Lewis, H.G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81: s279–s288.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S., Murphy, K.M., and Tamura, R. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 12–37.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bray, M. (2013). Shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 77: 412–420.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cai, F. (2014). Demographic transition, demographic dividend, and Lewis turning point in China. In: Huang, Y. and Cai, F. (eds.). Debating the Lewis turning point in China. Abingdon: Routledge: 17–29.

Download reference:

Cai, Y. and Feng, W. (2021). The social and sociological consequences of China’s one-child policy. Annual Review of Sociology 47: 587–606.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chen, Y., Guo, F., Wang, J., Cai, W., Wang, C., and Wang, K. (2020). Provincial and gridded population projection for China under shared socioeconomic pathways from 2010 to 2100. Scientific Data 7(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Doepke, M. and Kindermann, F. (2019). Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. American Economic Review 109(9): 3264–3306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Exley, S. (2021). Open policy making in the UK – To whom might policy formulation be “opening up”? Journal of Social Policy 50(3): 451–469.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Feng, Z., Liu, C., Guan, X., and Mor, V. (2012). China’s rapidly aging population creates policy challenges in shaping a viable long-term care system. Health Affairs 31(12): 2764–2773.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gillespie, D.O.S., Russell, A.F., and Lummaa, V. (2008). When fecundity does not equal fitness: Evidence of an offspring quantity versus quality trade-off in pre-industrial humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1635): 713–722.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Happel, S.K., Hill, J.K., and Low, S.A. (1984). An economic analysis of the timing of childbirth*. Population Studies 38(2): 299–311.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huang, W., Lei, X., and Sun, A. (2021). Fertility restrictions and life cycle outcomes: Evidence from the one-child policy in China. The Review of Economics and Statistics 103(4): 694–710.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jin, J. and Ball, S.J. (2020). Meritocracy, social mobility and a new form of class domination. British Journal of Sociology of Education 41(1): 64–79.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Joshi, H. (1998). The opportunity costs of childbearing: More than mothers’ business. Journal of Population Economics 11: 161–183.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kim, S., Tertilt, M., and Yum, M. (2024). Status externalities in education and low birth rates in Korea. American Economic Review 114(6): 1576–1611.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lawson, D.W. and Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2016). The offspring quantity-quality trade-off and human fertility variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1692): 20150145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Li, H. (2017). The ‘secrets’ of Chinese students’ academic success: Academic resilience among students from highly competitive academic environments. Educational Psychology 37(8): 1001–1014.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liu, H. (2014). The quality-quantity trade-off: Evidence from the relaxation of China’s one-child policy. Journal of Population Economics 27(2): 565–602.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lu, W., Zhou, S., and Wei, Y. (2022). Government policies and unintended consequences: Rising demand for private supplementary tutoring in China. International Journal of Educational Development 94: 102653.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mace, R. (2008). Reproducing in cities. Science 319(5864): 764–766.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education 72(4): 413–434.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Meng, J., Wang, H., Yang, Y., and Zhang, M. (2025). Education competition and fertility intention: Evidence from China’s private tutoring ban. The Economic Journal ueaf096.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mirowsky, J.E. and Ross, C.E. (2003). Education, social status, and health. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.

Download reference:

MOE (Ministry of Education) (2021). Further reducing the burden of students’ homework and off-campus training in compulsory education [in Chinese].

National Bureau of Statistics of China(NBSC) (2024). China statistics yearbook [in Chinese]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

Download reference:

Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13(4): 475–499.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J.M., Musick, K., and Iwasawa, M. (2015). Gender equity, opportunity costs of parenthood, and educational differences in unintended first births: Insights from Japan. Population Research and Policy Review 34(2): 179–199.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Robusto, C.C. (1957). The Cosine–Haversine formula. The American Mathematical Monthly 64(1): 38–40.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wang, F., Cai, Y., Shen, K., and Gietel-Basten, S. (2018). Is demography just a numerical exercise? Numbers, politics, and legacies of China’s one-child policy. Demography 55(2): 693–719.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Xue, M., Wang, H., Wang, Y., and Qiao, X. (2025). Decoding the educational illusion: Self-assurance, anxiety, and adaptive strategies in Chinese middle-class parental investment. British Journal of Sociology of Education 46(3): 391–407.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yu, J. and Xie, Y. (2021). Recent trends in the Chinese family. Demographic Research 44(25): 595–608.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zeng, Y. and Hesketh, T. (2016). The effects of China’s universal two-child policy. The Lancet 388(10054): 1930–1938.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zhang, W. and Bray, M. (2021). A changing environment of urban education: historical and spatial analysis of private supplementary tutoring in China. Environment and Urbanization 33(1): 43–62.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zhang, W. and Bray, M. (2018). Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: Access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxford Review of Education 44(2): 221–238.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zhang, Y., Dang, Y., He, Y., Ma, X., and Wang, L. (2021). Is private supplementary tutoring effective? A longitudinally detailed analysis of private tutoring quality in China. Asia Pacific Education Review 22(2): 239–259.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zhou, J. and Chen, H. (2023). Will reducing the burden of extracurricular tutoring raise fertility willingness in China? Five policy suggestions. Journal of Policy Modeling 45(6): 1132–1147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article