Volume 28 - Article 29 | Pages 821–848  

Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders

By An Katrien Sodermans, Koen Matthijs, Gray Swicegood

Abstract

Background: Research conducted in the 1990s showed that children who live alternately with their mother and father after divorce (joint physical custody) have closer relationships with both parents and better emotional outcomes. In 1995 and 2006, joint legal custody and joint physical custody became the default judicial recommendations in Belgium. These defaults served to increase the incidence of joint custody arrangements. However, parents with joint physical custody arrangements who divorced before 2006 may have had higher socio-economic standing and lower conflict relationships than couples that divorced afterwards. Thus earlier research on the impact of joint physical custody arrangements on child outcomes may be too optimistic when considering children of recently divorced parents.

Objective: This study examines the characteristics of four different physical custody arrangements (sole mother, sole father, joint physical, and flexible custody) in Flanders, Belgium, and whether these characteristics have changed over time. The legal changes in 1995 and 2006 are used to distinguish three divorce cohorts.

Methods: We use data on 2,207 couples that legally divorced between 1971 and 2010 from the Divorce in Flanders project, a large-scale representative multi-actor survey. Multinomial logistic regression models provide estimates of the likelihoods of different physical custody arrangements.

Results: The incidence of sole mother custody has decreased over the last decades and children increasingly alternate between the households of the mother and the father after divorce. The incidence of sole father custody has remained low. Higher educated parents are more likely to have joint physical custody arrangements than parents from lower social classes. Also, within couples, relative educational levels are important because the higher educated spouse is more likely to have physical custody of the child. We also find that the associations between socio-demographic variables and custody outcomes have changed over time. Prior to the legal changes low-conflict couples were overrepresented in joint physical custody arrangements, but this pattern has now disappeared.

Conclusions: Flanders has clearly followed the road towards more gender-neutral parenting. Hand in hand with changing legislation, joint physical custody has become more prevalent, and the socio-demographic profile of joint-custody families has become more heterogeneous. The increased likelihood that higher-conflict couples enter joint physical custody arrangements may have important consequences for the children involved.

Author’s Affiliation

• An Katrien Sodermans - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium EMAIL
• Koen Matthijs - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium EMAIL
• Gray Swicegood - Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents
Volume 28 - Article 15

Traditional and modern cohabitation in Latin America: A comparative typology
Volume 32 - Article 32

Post-divorce family trajectories of men and women in Flanders
Volume 32 - Article 31

Rivalry, solidarity, and longevity among siblings: A life course approach to the impact of sibship composition and birth order on later life mortality risk, Antwerp (1846-1920)
Volume 31 - Article 38

Family size and intergenerational social mobility during the fertility transition: Evidence of resource dilution from the city of Antwerp in nineteenth century Belgium
Volume 24 - Article 14

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Are highly educated partners really more gender egalitarian? A couple-level analysis of social class differentials in attitudes and behaviors
Volume 50 - Article 34    | Keywords: attitudes, couple analysis, education, educational level, gender, gender roles, housework, social class differentials

‘Will the one who keeps the children keep the house?’ Residential mobility after divorce by parenthood status and custody arrangements in France
Volume 40 - Article 14    | Keywords: custody arrangements, divorce, residential mobility, separation

Stepfather or biological father? Education-specific pathways of postdivorce fatherhood
Volume 37 - Article 51    | Keywords: custody arrangements, divorce, fatherhood, postdivorce family configurations, stepfamily

Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions
Volume 30 - Article 65    | Keywords: cohabitation, educational level, heterogamy, homogamy, Nordic countries, registry data, socioeconomic background, union dissolution

Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents
Volume 28 - Article 15    | Keywords: adolescence, custody arrangements, postdivorce family configurations, stepfamily