Volume 30 - Article 13 | Pages 377–412

Ethnic differences in integration levels and return migration intentions: A study of Estonian migrants in Finland

By Kristi Anniste, Tiit Tammaru

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:06 Jun 2013
Date published:06 Feb 2014
Word count:8199
Keywords:ethnicity, integration, return migration


Background: Immigrants‘ desire to stay in the host country or return to the country of origin depends largely on the balance between their degree of integration in the host country and their level of attachment to the country of origin. Ethnic diversity is growing rapidly in European countries, including in migrant-sending countries. It may be expected that members of the ethnic minority population and the majority population have different degrees of willingness to engage in return migration depending on their different levels of attachment to their country of origin.

Objective: This study examines differences in the return migration intentions of members of the ethnic minority population and members of the majority population in the sending country. Specifically, we seek to answer two main research questions: (1) To what extent do members of the sending country‘s ethnic minority and majority groups differ in their desire to return to the sending country? (2) How does the degree of integration in the host country shape differences in the return migration intentions of members of the sending country‘s ethnic minority and majority groups?

Methods: We use representative survey data on Estonian migrants in Finland and apply binary logistic regression on our data.

Results: Results suggest that there are important differences in the integration levels and in the return migration intentions of the ethnic Estonians and the ethnic Russians from Estonia living in Finland. Despite being much better integrated into Finnish society than ethnic Russians, the ethnic Estonians are much more likely to want to return to Estonia. Indeed, our study shows that ethnicity is one of the most important personal characteristics predicting return migration.

Conclusions: There is no obvious negative relationship between integration and return migration. Being a member of the sending country majority population is associated with a stronger intention to return, even when the migrant is well integrated into the new homeland.

Author's Affiliation

Kristi Anniste - Tartu Ülikool, Estonia [Email]
Tiit Tammaru - Tartu Ülikool, Estonia [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Types of spatial mobility and change in people's ethnic residential contexts
Volume 34 - Article 41

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» The effects of integration and transnational ties on international return migration intentions
Volume 25 - Article 24    | Keywords: integration, return migration

» Child poverty across immigrant generations in the United States, 1993–2016: Evidence using the official and supplemental poverty measures
Volume 39 - Article 40    | Keywords: integration

» Return intentions over the life course: Evidence on the effects of life events from a longitudinal sample of first- and second-generation Turkish migrants in Germany
Volume 39 - Article 38    | Keywords: return migration

» Migration responses of immigrants in Spain during the Great Recession
Volume 38 - Article 61    | Keywords: return migration

» The formation of ethnically mixed partnerships in Estonia: A stalling trend from a two-sided perspective
Volume 38 - Article 38    | Keywords: integration