Volume 31 - Article 20 | Pages 593–624 Author has provided data and code for replicating results

The residential segregation of detailed Hispanic and Asian groups in the United States: 1980-2010

By John Iceland, Daniel Weinberg, Lauren Hughes

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:04 Aug 2013
Date published:03 Sep 2014
Word count:6950
Keywords:Asians, assimilation, ethnic groups, Hispanics, integration, racial/ethnic disparities, residential segregation
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.20
Additional files:readme.31-20 (text file, 847 Byte)
 demographic-research.31-20 (zip file, 8 MB)
 

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic diversity continues to grow in communities across the United States, raising questions about the extent to which different ethnic groups will become residentially integrated.

Objective: While a number of studies have examined the residential patterns of pan-ethnic groups, our goal is to examine the segregation of several Asian and Hispanic ethnic groups - Cubans, Dominicans, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Salvadorans, Asian Indians, Chinese, Filipinos, Japanese, Koreans, and Vietnamese. We gauge the segregation of each group from several alternative reference groups using two measures over the 1980 to 2010 period.

Results: We find that the dissimilarity of Hispanics and Asians from other groups generally held steady or declined, though, because most Hispanic and Asian groups are growing, interaction with Whites also often declined. Our analyses also indicate that pan-ethnic segregation indexes do not always capture the experience of specific groups. Among Hispanics, Mexicans are typically less residentially segregated (as measured using the dissimilarity index) from Whites, Blacks, Asians, and other Hispanics than are other Hispanic-origin groups. Among Asian ethnic groups, Japanese and Filipinos tend to have lower levels of dissimilarity from Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics than other Asian groups. Examining different dimensions of segregation also indicates that dissimilarity scores alone often do not capture to what extent various ethnic groups are actually sharing neighborhoods with each other. Finally, color lines vary across groups in some important ways, even as the dominant trend has been toward reduced racial and ethnic residential segregation over time.

Conclusions: The overarching trend is that ethnic groups are becoming more residentially integrated, suggestive of assimilation, though there is significant variation across ethnic groups.

Author's Affiliation

John Iceland - Pennsylvania State University, United States of America [Email]
Daniel Weinberg - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States of America [Email]
Lauren Hughes - Pennsylvania State University, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» US disparities in affluence by household structure, 1959 to 2017
Volume 44 - Article 28

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» A summary period measure of immigrant advancement in the U.S.
Volume 24 - Article 12    | Keywords: assimilation, integration

» Race and agriculture during the assimilation era: Evidence from the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
Volume 46 - Article 37    | Keywords: assimilation

» The ethnic wage penalty in Western European regions: Is the European integration model confirmed when differences within countries are considered?
Volume 46 - Article 23    | Keywords: integration

» Metropolitan racial residential segregation in the United States: A microlevel and cross-context analysis of Black, Latino, and Asian segregation
Volume 46 - Article 8    | Keywords: assimilation

» Using race- and age-specific COVID-19 case data to investigate the determinants of the excess COVID-19 mortality burden among Hispanic Americans
Volume 44 - Article 29    | Keywords: racial/ethnic disparities