Volume 32 - Article 14 | Pages 421–442
Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation
|Date received:||13 Jul 2014|
|Date published:||12 Feb 2015|
|Keywords:||age-specific fertility rate (ASFR), cohabitation, fertility, marriage, total fertility rate (TFR)|
Background: The diffusion of cohabitation and, presumably, of childbearing within cohabitation, inspires interest in measuring the respective contribution of childbearing within marriage and within cohabitation to overall fertility. However, there is no consensus on a proper way to do so.
Objective: Contribute to the development of tools for assessing the relative importance of marriage and cohabitation to overall fertility by developing period measures closely related to age-specific fertility rates and the total fertility rate.
Methods: We introduce two measures: 1) the contribution of the conjugal state (living alone, living in a cohabiting union, being married) to age-specific fertility rates (CASFR) and 2) the contribution of the conjugal state to the TFR (CTFR). These measures are similar in construction to the marital (legitimate) fertility rates and marital (legitimate) TFR, but they are weighted by the proportion of women living alone, cohabiting, or being married at each age, so that their sum is the overall TFR. Taken together, they represent the fertility of the average woman of a synthetic cohort who moves across the various conjugal states (living alone, cohabiting, being married) over her life course. They provide "realistic" estimates of completed fertility within each conjugal state.
Conclusions: CASFRs provide a description of the fertility, over her life course, of a synthetic woman who would have spent her reproductive years living alone, cohabiting, and being married as the average woman of the synthetic cohort. CTFR provides a decomposition of the cumulative fertility of this synthetic woman. Over her life course, she would have had exactly the number of children computed using the overall TFR, but CTFR details the proportion of these children she would have had while living alone, while cohabiting, and while being married.
Comments: Despite being defined as a conditional ASR weighted by the age-specific proportion of women living alone, cohabiting, or being married, computing the CASFR does not require that one know the population distribution of women by conjugal status, as this quantity cancels out. As a consequence, CASFR and CTFR may be computed without this information, as the parity-specific ASFR may be computed without knowing the population distribution of women by parity.
Benoît Laplante - Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), Canada
Ana Laura Fostik - McGill University, Canada
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
The effect of union dissolution on the fertility of women in Montevideo, Uruguay
Volume 43 - Article 4
Change and continuity in the fertility of unpartnered women in Latin America, 1980–2010
Volume 38 - Article 51
A matter of norms: Family background, religion, and generational change in the diffusion of first union breakdown among French-speaking Quebeckers
Volume 35 - Article 27
The contributions of childbearing within marriage and within consensual union to fertility in Latin America, 1980-2010
Volume 34 - Article 29
Towards a Geography of Unmarried Cohabitation in the Americas
Volume 30 - Article 59
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55 | Keywords: cohabitation, fertility, marriage
Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage
Volume 7 - Article 18 | Keywords: cohabitation, fertility, marriage
A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14 | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage
Socioeconomic preconditions to union formation: Exploring variation by migrant background
Volume 45 - Article 32 | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage
An investigation of Jordan’s fertility stall and resumed decline: The role of proximate determinants
Volume 45 - Article 19 | Keywords: fertility, marriage
Cited References: 21
»View the references of this article
Download to Citation Manager