Volume 34 - Article 9 | Pages 259–284  

Non-standard work schedules, gender, and parental stress

By Mariona Lozano, Dana Hamplová, Céline Le Bourdais

Abstract

Background: Working non-standard hours changes the temporal structure of family life, constraining the time that family members spend with one another and threatening individuals’ well-being. However, the empirical research on the link between stress and non-standard schedules has provided mixed results. Some studies have indicated that working non-standard hours is harmful whereas others have suggested that working atypical hours might facilitate the balance between family and work. Moreover, there is some evidence that the association between stress and non-standard employment has different implications for men and women.

Objective: This paper examines the association between non-standard work schedules and stress among dual-earner couples with children. Two research questions are addressed. First, do predictability of the schedule and time flexibility moderate the link between non-standard work hours and stress? Second, do non-standard schedules affect men’s and women’s perceptions of stress differently?

Methods: We use a sample of 1,932 working parents from the Canadian 2010 General Social Survey, which includes a time-use diary. A sequential logit regression analysis stratified by gender is employed to model two types of result. First, we estimate the odds of being stressed versus not being stressed. Second, for all respondents feeling stressed, we estimate the odds of experiencing high levels versus moderate levels of stress.

Results: Our analysis shows that the link between non-standard working hours and perceived stress differs between mothers and fathers. First, fathers with non-standard schedules appear more likely to experience stress than those working standard hours, although the results are not significant. Among mothers, having a non-standard schedule is associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing stress. Second, the analysis focusing on the mediating role of flexibility and predictability indicates that predictability is more important than flexibility. Workers with non-standard predictable schedules exhibit a lower risk of being stressed than those with non-standard unpredictable hours. Work flexibility does not seem to bring any additional advantage to women. However, it is linked to higher odds of being stressed for fathers, particularly among those having non-standard schedules.

Author's Affiliation

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Advanced or postponed motherhood? Migrants’ and natives’ gap between ideal and actual age at first birth in Spain
Volume 49 - Article 22

Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Volume 35 - Article 50

Children’s union status and contact with mothers: A cross-national study
Volume 30 - Article 51

Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism
Volume 19 - Article 14

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Gendered intergenerational time transfers in Estonia
Volume 44 - Article 34    | Keywords: Estonia, intergenerational exchanges, time use, transition to adulthood

Japanese adolescents' time use: The role of household income and parental education
Volume 44 - Article 9    | Keywords: children, Japan, parenting, social inequality, time use

Fathers' involvement with their children in the United Kingdom: Recent trends and class differences
Volume 40 - Article 30    | Keywords: child support, fatherhood, inequality, time use

Ambient temperature and sexual activity: Evidence from time use surveys
Volume 40 - Article 12    | Keywords: sexual behavior, temperature, time use, weather variability

Housework division and gender ideology: When do attitudes really matter?
Volume 39 - Article 39    | Keywords: division of household work, gender attitudes, housework, Italy, time use