Volume 35 - Article 36 | Pages 1079–1100

Loss aversion and duration of residence

By Philip S. Morrison, William A.V. Clark

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:08 Jul 2015
Date published:12 Oct 2016
Word count:5613
Keywords:adjustment, endowment effects, internal migration, mobility, prospect theory, rational consumers
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.36
 

Abstract

Background: Studies of internal migration ask who moves, why they move, and what are the consequences - to themselves, their origin, and their destination. By contrast, studies of those who stay for very long durations are less common, despite the fact that most people move relatively infrequently.

Objective: We argue that staying is the dominant, preferred state and that moving is simply an adjustment toward a desired state of stability (or equilibrium). The core of our argument, already recognized in the literature, is that migration is risky. However, we extend the argument to loss aversion as developed within prospect theory. Prospect theory posits that existing possessions, including the dwelling and existing commodities, are attributed a value well beyond their purchase price and that this extends the average period of staying among the loss-averse.

Methods: Applying prospect theory has several challenges, including measurement of the reference point and potential degrees of gain and loss households face in deciding to change residence, as well as their own degree of loss aversion. The growing number of large panel sets should make it possible to estimate the degree to which endowment effects are likely to extend durations of residence as predicted by prospect theory.

Conclusions: Rational expectations models of mobility focus on the changes in the level of consumption of residential services. By contrast, prospect theory focuses on potential gains and losses relative to the existing dwelling - the reference point. As we confront increasing durations of residence in contemporary society, an application of prospect theory is likely to yield important advantages over existing models of mobility and staying.

Author's Affiliation

Philip S. Morrison - Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand [Email]
William A.V. Clark - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Transitions to partnership and parenthood: Is China still traditional?
Volume 43 - Article 6

» Introduction to the special collection on life course decisions of families in China
Volume 43 - Article 5

» Do women delay family formation in expensive housing markets?
Volume 27 - Article 1

» Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: Spatial mobility in the context of the life course
Volume 17 - Article 20

» A comparative analysis of leaving home in the United States, the Netherlands and West Germany
Volume 7 - Article 17

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Nonresident family as a motive for migration
Volume 42 - Article 13    | Keywords: internal migration

» Remain, leave, or return? Mothers’ location continuity after separation in Belgium
Volume 42 - Article 9    | Keywords: internal migration

» Internal migration in the United States: A comprehensive comparative assessment of the Consumer Credit Panel
Volume 41 - Article 33    | Keywords: internal migration

» Distinguishing tempo and ageing effects in migration
Volume 40 - Article 44    | Keywords: internal migration

» Variations in migration motives over distance
Volume 40 - Article 38    | Keywords: internal migration