Volume 37 - Article 47 | Pages 1515–1548
Decomposing American immobility: Compositional and rate components of interstate, intrastate, and intracounty migration and mobility decline
|Date received:||17 Jan 2017|
|Date published:||23 Nov 2017|
|Keywords:||migration, mobility decline, population aging, residential mobility, United States of America|
|Additional files:||readme.37-47 (text file, 1 kB)|
|demographic-research.37-47 (zip file, 123 MB)|
Background: American migration rates have declined by nearly half since the mid-20th century, but it is not clear why. While the emerging literature on the topic stresses the salience of shifts in the composition of the American population, estimates of the contribution of population aging, increasing diversity, rising homeownership, and other shifts vary widely. Furthermore, it is unclear whether and how compositional shifts differ in their effects on migration over different geographic scales.
Objective: To gauge the contribution of compositional shifts to concomitant declines in migration over various distances, while allowing for group variations in the rates at which declines occur.
Methods: Drawing on individual-level IPUMS Current Population Survey data from 1982 to 2015, I use the Oaxaca–Blinder method to decompose declines in interstate migration, intrastate migration, and intracounty mobility.
Results: Between a quarter and a third of declines since 1982 are attributable to aging and increasing diversity. Changing ethnoracial composition exerts a stronger influence on interstate migration, while aging has a stronger effect on local mobility. Results also reveal more dramatic declines among non-Latino Whites and those under age 35, as well as a marked delay and decline in peak mobility rates with each successive birth cohort.
Conclusions: Results point to social and economic shifts as the key drivers of American immobility, and the need for reorientation within the emerging literature. Future research should investigate the causes of group-specific rates of decline and focus on local mobility, where declines are most concentrated and where rising immobility is most problematic.
Thomas B. Foster - University of Washington, United States of America
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research