Volume 38 - Article 21 | Pages 513–548 Editor's Choice

Design and implementation of a high-quality probability sample of immigrants and ethnic minorities: Lessons learnt

By Peter Lynn, Alita Nandi, Violetta Parutis, Lucinda Platt

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:12 Oct 2017
Date published:13 Feb 2018
Word count:9364
Keywords:boost sample, ethnic minorities, immigrants, two-stage sampling, UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), United Kingdom


Background: Surveys of immigrants face challenges of coverage, representativeness, and response rates. Longitudinal studies of immigrants and ethnic minorities, which have potential to address pressing issues in demographic research, are rare or partial. In the absence of register data, the highest quality approach is argued to be probability sampling using household screening.

Objective: To describe the design and implementation of a nationally representative probability sample of immigrants and ethnic minorities in the United Kingdom.

Methods: We boosted a nationally representative sample by using small-area census data to identify areas that covered the majority of immigrant and target ethnic minority populations and oversampled addresses from those areas using varying sampling fractions. Households were screened for eligibility based on whether they included a target immigrant/ethnic minority member. If so, all adult members were interviewed.

Results: We anticipated the main challenges would be: fewer eligible households than predicted in sampled areas due to geographical mobility; refusal of those screened to provide information on household eligibility; nonparticipation of eligible households. All these issues were found to some degree. We describe how we addressed them and with what success.

Conclusions: A careful design and robust fieldwork practices can enable a two-stage probability sampling to achieve good coverage and a much more representative sample of immigrants and ethnic minorities than with more ad hoc methods. The potential research payoffs are substantial.

Contribution: We demonstrate the potential for careful two-stage sampling on the back of an existing study for creating a high-quality multi-purpose survey of immigrants.

Author's Affiliation

Peter Lynn - University of Essex, United Kingdom [Email]
Alita Nandi - University of Essex, United Kingdom [Email]
Violetta Parutis - University of Essex, United Kingdom [Email]
Lucinda Platt - London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Adapting chain referral methods to sample new migrants: Possibilities and limitations
Volume 33 - Article 24

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom
Volume 33 - Article 10    | Keywords: ethnic minorities, immigrants, United Kingdom

» When richer doesn’t mean thinner: Ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and the risk of child obesity in the United Kingdom
Volume 41 - Article 23    | Keywords: ethnic minorities, United Kingdom

» Why does fertility remain high among certain UK-born ethnic minority women?
Volume 35 - Article 49    | Keywords: immigrants, United Kingdom

» Introduction to research on immigrant and ethnic minority families in Europe
Volume 35 - Article 2    | Keywords: ethnic minorities, immigrants

» Exploring the role of legal status and neighborhood social capital on immigrant economic integration in Los Angeles
Volume 46 - Article 1    | Keywords: immigrants