Volume 38 - Article 33 | Pages 897–928 Editor's Choice

Can a cash transfer to families change fertility behaviour?

By Synøve N. Andersen, Nina Drange, Trude Lappegård

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:27 Mar 2017
Date published:08 Mar 2018
Word count:8698
Keywords:cash for care, cash transfer, family policy, fertility, Norway


Objective: This paper assesses the much-disputed relationship between family policy and fertility, and cash transfers and fertility in particular.

Methods: We take advantage of a cash-for-care (CFC) policy introduced in Norway in 1998, and compare the subsequent fertility behaviour of eligible and ineligible mothers over a four-year period. We estimate linear models assessing both the occurrence and timing of second births, relying on a rich set of covariates and a sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our results.

Results: Contrary to theoretical expectations, the results show that CFC-eligible mothers had a slower progression to second births and lower short-term fertility. The patterns differ between different groups of mothers, and the decline in subsequent childbearing is only statistically significant among mothers with upper secondary (but not higher) education and part-time or full-time employment. We find no increase in short-term fertility in any group of mothers, and suggest that this pattern may be driven by an interaction between the CFC benefit and the already established Norwegian parental leave scheme.

Contribution: The paper demonstrates how policy changes may indeed be associated with changes in fertility behaviour, and that this association may run in theoretically unexpected directions when a given policy is implemented in a wider policy framework. Moreover, it demonstrates how eligible parents may differ in their response to policies depending on the policy’s income effect and the parents’ opportunity costs of childbearing.

Author's Affiliation

Synøve N. Andersen - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway [Email]
Nina Drange - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway [Email]
Trude Lappegård - Universitetet i Oslo, Norway [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden
Volume 40 - Article 51

» Introduction to the Special Collection on Finding Work-Life Balance: History, Determinants, and Consequences of New Bread-Winning Models in the Industrialized World
Volume 37 - Article 26

» The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research
Volume 32 - Article 9

» Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34

» Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries
Volume 20 - Article 14

» New fertility trends in Norway
Volume 2 - Article 3

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden
Volume 40 - Article 51    | Keywords: family policy, fertility, Norway

» Fertility and family policy in Norway - A reflection on trends and possible connections
Volume 10 - Article 10    | Keywords: family policy, fertility, Norway

» New fertility trends in Norway
Volume 2 - Article 3    | Keywords: family policy, fertility, Norway

» Simulating family life courses: An application for Italy, Great Britain, Norway, and Sweden
Volume 44 - Article 1    | Keywords: fertility, Norway

» Education, labour, and the demographic consequences of birth postponement in Europe
Volume 36 - Article 23    | Keywords: family policy, fertility