Volume 38 - Article 33 | Pages 897–928 
Can a cash transfer to families change fertility behaviour?
References
Aakvik, A., Salvanes, K.G., and Vaage, K. (2010). Measuring heterogeneity in the returns to education using an education reform. European Economic Review 54(4): 483–500.
Weblink | doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.09.001 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Aassve, A. and Lappegård, T. (2009). Childcare cash benefits and fertility timing in Norway. European Journal of Population 25(1): 67–88.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s10680-008-9158-6 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Aassve, A. and Lappegård, T. (2010). Cash-benefit policy and childbearing decisions in Norway. Marriage and Family Review 46(3): 149–169.
Weblink | doi:10.1080/01494929.2010.490094 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Angrist, J.D. and Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's comparison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Becker, G.S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: Roberts, G.B. (ed.). Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research: 209–240.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Becker, G.S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Björklund, A. (2007). Does a family-friendly policy raise fertility levels? Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (Report 2007: 3).
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Cools, S., Fiva, K., and Kirkebøen, L. (2015). Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 117(3): 801–828.
Weblink | doi:10.1111/sjoe.12113 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Currie, J. and Schwandt, H. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of unemployment on fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 111(41): 14734–14739.
Weblink | doi:10.1073/pnas.1408975111 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Drange, N. (2015). Crowding out dad? The effect of a cash-for-care subsidy on family time allocation. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 40(2): 1–29.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Drange, N. and Rege, M. (2013). Trapped at home: The effect of mothers’ temporary labour market exits on their subsequent work career. Labour Economics 24: 125–136.
Weblink | doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.003 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Duvander, A.-Z., Lappegård, T., and Johansson, M. (2016). Family policy reform impact on continued fertility in the Nordic countries. Stockholm: Stockholm University (SPaDE Working Paper 2016:2).
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Easterlin, R.A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning 6(3): 54–63.
Weblink | doi:10.2307/1964934 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Ellingsæter, A.L. and Leira, A. (2006). Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Bristol: Policy Press.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Gustafsson, S. (2001). Optimal age at motherhood: Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe. Journal of Population Economics 14(2): 225–247.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s001480000051 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Hardoy, I. and Schøne, P. (2010). Incentives to work? The impact of a ‘cash-for-care’ benefit for immigrant and native mothers labour market participation. Labour Economics 17(6): 963–974.
Weblink | doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.008 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Havnes, T. and Mogstad, M. (2011). No child left behind: Subsidized child care and children’s long-run outcomes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(2): 97–129.
Weblink | doi:10.1257/pol.3.2.97 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Hellevik, O. (2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. 43(1): 59–74. doi:. Quality and Quantity 43(1): 59–74.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequality in different types of welfare states. Social Politics 7(2): 127–191.
Weblink | doi:10.1093/sp/7.2.127 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Kreyenfeld, M. (2002). Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research 7(2): 15–47.
Weblink | doi:10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Lalive, R. and Zweimüller, J. (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3): 1363–1402.
Weblink | doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1363 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Lappegård, T. (2000). New fertility trends in Norway. Demographic Research 2(3).
Weblink | doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.3 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Lappegård, T. (2010). Family policies in Norway. European Journal of Population 26(1): 99–116.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9190-1 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Lappegård, T. (2012). Couples’ parental leave practices: Workplace situations. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 33(2): 167–182.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s10834-012-9291-6 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 64–82.
Weblink | doi:10.1093/esr/jcp006 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
NAV (2013). Mottakere av kontantstøtte pr. Desember, etter kjønn og alder: 2000–2010 [Recipients of the cash-for-care benefit, as of December, by sex and age: 2000–2010] [electronic resource]. Oslo: The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration.
Weblink | https://www.nav.no/no/NAV+og+samfunn/Statisti ... |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
OECD (2005). OECD employment outlook: Statistical annex. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Reppen, H.K. and Rønning, E. (1999). Barnefamiliers tilsynsordninger, yrkesdeltakelse og bruk av kontantstøtte våren 1999 [The care arrangements, labour market participation and cash-for-care uptake of families with children, spring of 1999]. Oslo: Statistics Norway (Report 1999/27).
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Rønsen, M. (2009). Long-term effects of cash for childcare on mothers’ labour supply. Labour 23(3): 507–533.
Weblink | doi:10.1111/j.1467-9914.2009.00456.x |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Schøne, P. (2004). Labour supply effects of a cash-for-care subsidy. Journal of Population Economics 17(4): 703–727.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0176-8 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Statistics Norway (2014). StatBank table 08921: Persons 16 years and older, by sex, age and level of education [electronic resource]. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Weblink | https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selecttab ... |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Stortinget (2014). Lov om kontantstøtte til småbarnsforeldre (kontantstøtteloven) [The law on cash grants to parents with young children] [electronic resource]. Oslo: Stortinget.
Weblink | https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publika ... |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Walker, J.R. (1995). The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior. Journal of Population Economics 8(3): 223–251.
Weblink | doi:10.1007/BF00185251 |
Download reference in | RIS | BibTeX |
Articles