Volume 39 - Article 35 | Pages 927–962

Fertility responses to individual and contextual unemployment: Differences by socioeconomic background

By Wei-hsin Yu, Shengwei Sun

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:24 Apr 2018
Date published:25 Oct 2018
Word count:8177
Keywords:childbearing, socioeconomic background, unemployment


Background: Although research on the consequences of economic recession has long linked unemployment with childbearing, it rarely distinguishes the effects of individuals’ own unemployment and their surroundings’ unemployment levels on their likelihood of having children. Even fewer studies compare how these effects vary for different groups of individuals.

Objective: In this study we specifically ask whether fertility timings in the United States are more sensitive to the unemployment rates of individuals’ immediate surroundings or to their own unemployment. Moreover, we investigate whether young adults with different educational levels and parental resources may adjust their childbearing timing differently in response to their own employment status and local unemployment rates.

Methods: Using 17 rounds of data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, we fit discrete-time event history models predicting men’s and women’s pace of childbearing.

Results: The analysis indicates that relatively disadvantaged young adults, such as those with low education or parents with low education, tend to delay childbirth in response to high local unemployment rates but are less likely than the more advantaged to defer childbearing when facing their own unemployment.

Conclusions: We argue that the disadvantaged are relatively sensitive to the local unemployment rate but relatively insensitive to their own unemployment compared to those with fewer disadvantages, because the former suffer more from unemployment in times of economic turmoil, while having lower prospects of economic improvement once having become unemployed.

Contribution: Results from this study elucidate how rising unemployment rates shape fertility patterns and indicate the need to consider the effect of parental socioeconomic status on men’s childbearing transitions. Furthermore, our findings help reconcile the debate on how well disadvantaged women’s childbearing timing corresponds to their varying economic conditions.

Author's Affiliation

Wei-hsin Yu - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America [Email]
Shengwei Sun - University of Maryland, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Job characteristics, marital intentions, and partner-seeking actions: Longitudinal evidence from Japan
Volume 43 - Article 52

» Comparing same- and different-sex relationship dynamics: Experiences of young adults in Taiwan
Volume 40 - Article 17

» Another work-family interface: Work characteristics and family intentions in Japan
Volume 36 - Article 13

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Changing mind, changing plans? Instability of individual gender attitudes and postponement of marriage in Germany
Volume 47 - Article 25    | Keywords: childbearing

» Disentangling the Swedish fertility decline of the 2010s
Volume 47 - Article 12    | Keywords: childbearing

» Couples' paid work, state-level unemployment, and first births in the United States
Volume 45 - Article 38    | Keywords: unemployment

» The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data
Volume 45 - Article 35    | Keywords: childbearing

» The role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China
Volume 45 - Article 8    | Keywords: childbearing


»Volume 39





Similar Articles



Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID