Volume 40 - Article 34 | Pages 975–1014

Housing consequences of divorce and separation in a 'super home ownership' regime: The case of Hungary

By Lívia Murinkó

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:31 May 2018
Date published:17 Apr 2019
Word count:11027
Keywords:divorce, Generations and Gender Survey (GGS), housing, Hungary, intergenerational coresidence, partnership dissolution
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection on “Separation, Divorce, and Residential Mobility in a Comparative Perspective” here.


Background: Partnership dissolution is a major reason for residential mobility and migration for former partners. Moving is more resource-intensive in a 'super home ownership' housing regime like Hungary and may increase the vulnerability of people with low socioeconomic status. This analysis is the first attempt to study the interrelationship between partnership transitions and housing dynamics in a Central and Eastern European country.

Objective: We analyse how people adjust their housing situation and place of residence to their changing family circumstances after partnership dissolution in Hungary.

Methods: We study change in partnership status and housing between 2008 and 2012 using the Hungarian Generations and Gender Survey (n = 5,408) with descriptive analysis and logistic regression models. The role of cohabitation and marriage, coresidence with parents, housing tenure, and socioeconomic status receives special attention.

Results: Former couples move more often after divorce than separation from cohabitation, but divorcees who lived with their parents before union dissolution tend to stay. For men, returning to the parental household is a common solution. Both high and low socioeconomic status may increase the probability of moving after separation or divorce.

Conclusions: Home ownership is a motivating factor for moving after divorce in Hungary. Parental household provides an important ‘safety net’ and in some cases a long-term solution for couples in an inflexible housing market where the system of public housing is missing and private rental is expensive.

Contribution: We emphasise the importance of differentiating between the dissolution of marriages and cohabitations and considering coresidence with parents both as the origin and destination of moves.

Author's Affiliation

Lívia Murinkó - Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet (Hungarian Demographic Research Institute), Hungary [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» The effect of education on second births in Hungary: A test of the time-squeeze, self-selection and partner-effect hypotheses
Volume 28 - Article 1

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Who moves out and who keeps the home? Short-term and medium-term mobility consequences of grey divorce in Belgium
Volume 45 - Article 9    | Keywords: divorce, housing

» Family life transitions, residential relocations, and housing in the life course: Current research and opportunities for future work: Introduction to the Special Collection on “Separation, Divorce, and Residential Mobility in a Comparative Perspective”
Volume 43 - Article 2    | Keywords: divorce, housing

» Homeownership after separation: A longitudinal analysis of Finnish register data
Volume 41 - Article 29    | Keywords: divorce, housing

» Family dynamics and housing: Conceptual issues and empirical findings
Volume 29 - Article 14    | Keywords: divorce, housing

» Untraditional caring arrangements among parents living apart: The case of Norway
Volume 27 - Article 5    | Keywords: divorce, partnership dissolution


»Volume 40





Similar Articles



Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID