Volume 47 - Article 1 | Pages 1–36

A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use

By Ester Lazzari, Edith Gray, Bernard Baffour

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:28 Jul 2021
Date published:06 Jul 2022
Word count:5779
Keywords:childbearing desires, contraception, dyads, life course, perceived infertility
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2022.47.1
 

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing literature on women’s perception of subfecundity and contraceptive use, with studies showing that women with perceived difficulties conceiving are more likely to have an unintended pregnancy because of a lower reliance on contraception. There is little research investigating the correlates of perceived subfecundity, and quantitative investigation of couple-level perceived subfecundity appears absent from the literature, which is somewhat surprising, as the inability to have a child is a couple-level outcome. Furthermore, most studies that relate to perceived subfecundity and the use of contraception, or lack thereof, are typically limited to young adults.

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the couple-level correlates of perceived subfecundity and to investigate the relationship between perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use among a nationally representative sample of couples.

Methods: Drawing on data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, binary and multinomial logistic regression models are estimated using the couple-dyad as the unit of analysis.

Results: Both biological and life-course interference factors are strong predictors of perceived subfecundity at the couple level, with women’s characteristics more influential than their partner’s characteristics. Additionally, couples in which at least one partner perceives subfecundity are less likely to use contraception, regardless of their short-term intentions or desire to have a child.

Contribution: Men’s and women’s characteristics differently influence the likelihood of perceiving subfecundity at the couple level and the perception of subfecundity is a relevant reason why couples do not use contraception.

Author's Affiliation

Ester Lazzari - Universität Wien, Austria [Email]
Edith Gray - Australian National University, Australia [Email]
Bernard Baffour - Australian National University, Australia [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data
Volume 45 - Article 35

» Estimating multiregional survivorship probabilities for sparse data: An application to immigrant populations in Australia, 1981–2011
Volume 40 - Article 18

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Coping with ageing: An historical longitudinal study of internal return migrations later in life in the Netherlands
Volume 46 - Article 27    | Keywords: life course

» Do tenants suffer from status syndrome? Homeownership, norms, and suicide in Belgium
Volume 46 - Article 16    | Keywords: life course

» Internal migration and the de-standardization of the life course: A sequence analysis of reasons for migrating
Volume 46 - Article 12    | Keywords: life course

» Gender division of housework during the COVID-19 pandemic: Temporary shocks or durable change?
Volume 45 - Article 43    | Keywords: life course

» Proximity to mother over the life course in the United States: Overall patterns and racial differences
Volume 45 - Article 23    | Keywords: life course