Volume 14 - Article 2 | Pages 27-46

Increments to life and mortality tempo

By Griffith Feeney

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:23 Feb 2005
Date published:25 Jan 2006
Word count:2788
Keywords:adult mortality, increments to life, length of life, life expectancy at birth, mortality, mortality measurement, mortality tempo, mortality tempo adjustment, period-cohort relationships, risk of death, robustness of Bongaarts-Feeney method, tempo adjustment
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.2
Weblink:For proofs of a formula in this publication, please also see 14-3 by Gampe and Yashin.
 

Abstract

This paper introduces and develops the idea of “increments to life.” Increments to life are roughly analogous to forces of mortality: they are quantities specified for each age and time by a mathematical function of two variables that may be used to describe, analyze and model changing length of life in populations.
The rationale is three-fold. First, I wanted a general mathematical representation of Bongaart’s “life extension” pill (Bongaarts and Feeney 2003) allowing for continuous variation in age and time. This is accomplished in sections 3-5, to which sections 1-2 are preliminaries. It turned out to be a good deal more difficult than I expected, partly on account of the mathematics, but mostly because it requires thinking in very unaccustomed ways.
Second, I wanted a means of assessing the robustness of the Bongaarts-Feeney mortality tempo adjustment formula (Bongaarts and Feeney 2003) against variations in increments to life by age. Section 6 shows how the increments to life mathematics accomplishes this with an application to the Swedish data used in Bongaarts and Feeney (2003). In this application, at least, the Bongaarts-Feeney adjustment is robust.
Third, I hoped by formulating age-variable increments to life to avoid the slight awkwardness of working with conditional rather than unconditional survival functions. This third aim has not been accomplished, but this appears to be because it was unreasonable to begin with. While it is possible to conceptualize length of life as completely described by an age-varying increments to life function, this is not consistent with the Bongaarts-Feeney mortality tempo adjustment.
What seems to be needed, rather, is a model that incorporates two fundamentally different kinds of changes in mortality and length of life, one based on the familiar force of mortality function, the other based on the increments to life function. Section 7 considers heuristically what such models might look like.

Author's Affiliation

Griffith Feeney - Independent researcher, International [Email]

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Mortality tempo-adjustment: An empirical application
Volume 15 - Article 21    | Keywords: mortality, mortality tempo, tempo adjustment

» Changing mortality and average cohort life expectancy
Volume 13 - Article 5    | Keywords: mortality, mortality tempo

» Measuring the compression of mortality
Volume 3 - Article 6    | Keywords: length of life, mortality

» Factors responsible for mortality variation in the United States: A latent variable analysis
Volume 31 - Article 2    | Keywords: mortality

» The pace of aging: Intrinsic time scales in demography
Volume 30 - Article 57    | Keywords: mortality

Articles

»Volume 14

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID