Volume 28 - Article 14 | Pages 409–420
Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
By Jan M. Hoem, Marika Jalovaara, Cornelia Muresan
References
Barkalov, N.B. (2005). Changes in the quantum of Russian fertility during the 1980s and early 1990s. Population and Development Review 31(3): 545-556.
Barkalov, N.B. (1999). The fertility decline in Russia, 1989-1996: A view with period parity-progression ratios. Genus 55(3-4): 11-60.
Blayo, C. (1986). La constitution de la famille en France depuis 1946. Population (French Edition) 41(4-5): 721-747.
Breton, D. and Prioux, F. (2005). Two children or three? Influence of family policy and socio-demographic factors. Population (English Edition) 60(4): 415-445.
Feeney, G. and Yu, J. (1987). Period parity progression measures of fertility in China. Population Studies 41(1): 77-102.
Henry, L. (1951). Étude statistique de l'espacement des naissances. Population (French Edition) 6(3): 425-444.
Hobcraft, J.N. and Casterline, J.B. (1983). Speed of reproduction. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute (ISI), Word Fertility Survey Comparative Studies.
Hobcraft, J.N., Goldman, N., and Chidambaram, V.C. (1982). Advances in the P/F ratio method for the analysis of birth histories. Population Studies 36(2): 291-316.
Hoem, J.M. and Mureşan, C. (2011). The role of consensual unions in Romanian total fertility. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography (16).
Hoem, J.M. and Mureşan, C. (2011). The total marital fertility rate and its extensions. European Journal of Population 27(4): 295-312.
Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., McDonald, P., and Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. (2006). The Iranian fertility decline, 1981-1999: An application of the synthetic parity progression ratio method. Population (English Edition) 61(5-6): 701-718.
Jalovaara, M. (2012). Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969-81. Population Studies 66(1): 69-85.
Jalovaara, M. (2012). Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. European Journal of Population .
Jalovaara, M. and Miettinen, A. (2012). Does his paycheck also matter? The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography (10).
Mäenpää, E. (2009). Cohabiting partners‟ socioeconomic characteristics and the transition to marriage in Finland. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 44: 63-77.
Mäenpää, E. and Jalovaara, M. (2011). The effects of homogamy in socio-economic background and education on union dissolution: Divergent effects in cohabitations and marriages? Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography (18).
Mureşan, C. and Hoem, J.M. (2010). The negative educational gradients in Romanian fertility. Demographic Research 22(4): 95-114.
Murphy, M. and Berrington, A. (1993). Constructing period parity progression ratios from household survey data. In: Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (ed.). New Perspectives on Fertility in Britain. London: Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office (HMSO): 17-33.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1987). Period parity progression ratios and birth intervals in England and Wales, 1941-1971: A synthetic life table analysis. Population Studies 41(1): 103-125.
Rallu, J.-L. (1986). Descendance des générations françaises et probabilités d‟agrandissement. Population (French Edition) 41(4-5): 763-802.
Ryder, N.B. (1951). The cohort approach: Essays in the measurement of temporal variations in demographic behavior. [Ph.D.]. New York: Princeton University.