Volume 28 - Article 14 | Pages 409–420
Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
By Jan M. Hoem, Marika Jalovaara, Cornelia Muresan
Abstract
Background: Remarkably little is known about the significance of consensual unions for fertility. This is true everywhere, but the lacuna is more important in the Nordic countries where there is so much childbearing outside of marriage, mostly in consensual unions. The purpose of this paper is to help fill this hole in our knowledge for Finland.
Objective: Unusually good register data enable us to study recent fertility trends by union status (married, cohabiting, neither) using records for some 112,000 Finnish women, or 11% of all women at fertile ages.
Methods: Our description of fertility is based on group-specific duration-based TFRs, which is the number of children borne by a woman who remains in the group throughout her reproductive life, as computed from the fertility rates for a synthetic cohort. This is an intuitively appealing metric that has been taken into systematic use only recently.
Results: We find substantial fertility differences between women who cohabit, women who marry directly (i.e., without pre-marital cohabitation), and women who marry their cohabitational partner. As one would also expect in Finland, cohabiting women have much lower fertility than married women. The marital TFR is highest among the directly-married and declines monotonically as the length of pre-marital cohabitation increases, even when premarital childbearing is included in the count. As far as we know the latter relationship has not been shown before, because extensive data for complete cohabitational unions have not been available for other populations.
Conclusions: The Finnish data are unique, even among the Nordic countries, in that they contain individual-level life histories of family dynamics that cover consensual unions from their very start. Fertility analysis would benefit if data similar to the Finnish were to become available, because analyses that rely on civil status as an indicator of union status barely add anything to what we already know about today's family dynamics.
Author's Affiliation
- Jan M. Hoem - Stockholms Universitet, Sweden EMAIL
- Marika Jalovaara - Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku), Finland EMAIL
- Cornelia Muresan - Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
The negative educational gradients in Romanian fertility
Volume 22 - Article 4
A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14
Homeownership after separation: A longitudinal analysis of Finnish register data
Volume 41 - Article 29
Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
Volume 37 - Article 37
From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55
Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44
Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions
Volume 30 - Article 65
Immigrant fertility in Sweden, 2000-2011: A descriptive note
Volume 30 - Article 30
Does his paycheck also matter?: The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland
Volume 28 - Article 31
A review of the antecedents of union dissolution
Volume 23 - Article 10
Levels of recent union formation : Six European countries compared
Volume 22 - Article 9
Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context
Volume 19 - Article 23
Overview Chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility
Volume 19 - Article 10
Summary and general conclusions: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe
Volume 19 - Article 2
Preface: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe
Volume 19 - Article 1
Marriage formation as a process intermediary between migration and childbearing
Volume 18 - Article 21
The reporting of statistical significance in scientific journals: A reflexion
Volume 18 - Article 15
Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course
Volume 17 - Article 14
Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 2: Marriage and first birth
Volume 15 - Article 17
Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 1: Education and first childbearing
Volume 15 - Article 16
Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955-59
Volume 14 - Article 16
Education and childlessness: The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955-59
Volume 14 - Article 15
Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden
Volume 14 - Article 4
Why does Sweden have such high fertility?
Volume 13 - Article 22
Childbearing patterns for Swedish mothers of twins, 1961-1999
Volume 11 - Article 15
Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage
Volume 7 - Article 16
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
The short- and long-term determinants of fertility in Uruguay
Volume 51 - Article 10
| Keywords:
fertility,
panel data,
stages of female reproductive life,
time series,
Uruguay
The big decline: Lowest-low fertility in Uruguay (2016–2021)
Volume 50 - Article 16
| Keywords:
adolescent fertility,
birth order,
fertility,
Latin America,
ultra-low fertility,
Uruguay
Cohort fertility of immigrants to Israel from the former Soviet Union
Volume 50 - Article 13
| Keywords:
age at first birth,
assimilation,
cohort analysis,
fertility,
immigration,
parity,
religiosity
Fertility decline, changes in age structure, and the potential for demographic dividends: A global analysis
Volume 50 - Article 9
| Keywords:
age structure,
demographic dividend,
demographic transition,
fertility,
migration,
population momentum,
working-age population
Analyzing hyperstable population models
Volume 49 - Article 37
| Keywords:
birth trajectory,
cohort analysis,
cyclical populations,
dynamic population model,
fertility,
hyperstable,
period
Cited References: 21
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar