Volume 30 - Article 11 | Pages 333–360  

Another 'futile quest'? A simulation study of Yang and Land's Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model

By Andrew Bell, Kelvyn Jones

Abstract

Background: Whilst some argue that a solution to the age-period-cohort (APC) 'identification problem' is impossible, numerous methodological solutions have been proposed, including Yang and Land's Hierarchical-APC (HAPC) model: a multilevel model considering periods and cohorts as cross-classified contexts in which individuals exist.

Objective: To assess the assumptions made by the HAPC model, and the situations in which it does and does not work.

Methods: Simulation study. Simulation scenarios assess the effect of (a) cohort trends in the Data Generating Process (DGP) (compared to only random variation), and (b) grouping cohorts (in both DGP and fitted model).

Results: The model only works if either (a) we can assume that there are no linear (or non-linear) trends in periods or cohorts, (b) we control any cohort trend in the model's fixed part and assume there is no period trend, or (c) we group cohorts in such a way that they exactly match the groupings in the (unknown) DGP. Otherwise, the model can arbitrarily reapportion APC effects, radically impacting interpretation.

Conclusions: Since the purpose of APC analysis is often to ascertain the presence of period and/or cohort trends, and since we rarely have solid (if any) theory regarding cohort groupings, there are few circumstances in which this model achieves what Yang and Land claim it can. The results bring into question findings of several published studies using the HAPC model. However, the structure of the model remains a conceptual advance that is useful when we can assume the DGP has no period trends.

Author's Affiliation

• Andrew Bell - University of Sheffield, United Kingdom EMAIL
• Kelvyn Jones - University of Bristol, United Kingdom EMAIL

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

The COVID-19 pandemic and fertility responses: TFR simulation analysis using parity progressions in South Korea
Volume 49 - Article 32    | Keywords: COVID-19, fertility intentions, marriage intentions, simulation

Unobserved population heterogeneity and dynamics of health disparities
Volume 43 - Article 34    | Keywords: birth cohorts, cumulative advantage, life expectancy, mortality selection, simulation, unobserved frailty

Taking birth year into account when analysing effects of maternal age on child health and other outcomes: The value of a multilevel-multiprocess model compared to a sibling model
Volume 40 - Article 43    | Keywords: birth cohorts, maternal age, multilevel model, multiprocess model, siblings, simulation

Heterogeneity's ruses: How hidden variation affects population trajectories of age-dependent fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster
Volume 30 - Article 10    | Keywords: Drosophila, fecundity, heterogeneity, plateau, reproductive life span, senescence, simulation

An application of MCMC simulation in mortality projection for populations with limited data
Volume 30 - Article 1    | Keywords: Bayesian approach, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), modelling, mortality projection, WinBUGS