Volume 37 - Article 8 | Pages 189–228  

Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics

By Paulina Gałęzewska, Brienna Perelli-Harris, Ann Berrington

References

Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., and Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 170(3): 781–799.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Allan, G., Crow, G., and Hawker, S. (2011). Stepfamilies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Allison, P.D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology 13: 61–98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P.R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 1269–1287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andreß, H.-J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., and Hummelsheim, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution: A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden. European Sociological Review 22(5): 533–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age, and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research 17(2): 69–80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. and Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends 145: 35–59.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. and Solaz, A. (2013). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population 29(1): 39–67.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaumont, K. and Manson, P. (2014). Child maintenance systems in EU member states from a gender perspective: In-depth anaysis for the FEMM Committee. Brussels: European Parliament.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S., Landes, E.M., and Michael, R.T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy 85(6): 1141–1187.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. and Goldscheider, F. (2002). Children and union formation in Sweden. European Sociological Review 18(3): 289–299.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F. and Liefbroer, A. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. (2015). Integrating macro-and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change. Population Studies 69((supp.1)): 11–20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blanc, A.K. (1987). The formation and dissolution of second unions: Marriage and cohabitation in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 49(2): 391–400.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bryan, M.L. and Jenkins, S.P. (2013). Regression analysis of country effects using multilevel data: A cautionary tale. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA Discussion Paper 7583).

Download reference:

Bukodi, E. (2012). Serial cohabitation among men in Britain: Does work history matter? European Journal of Population 28(4): 441–466.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L., Sweet, J., and Martin, T.C. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 52(3): 747–756.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cunningham, M. and Thornton, A. (2005). The influence of union transitions on white adults’ attitudes toward cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 710–720.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2003). Alternative routes in the remarriage market: Competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces 81(4): 1459–1498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Regt, S., Mortelmans, D., and Marynissen, T. (2012). Financial consequences of relationship dissolution: A longitudinal comparison of formerly married and unmarried cohabiting men and women. Sociology 47(1): 90–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dewilde, C. (2002). The financial consequences of relationship dissolution for women in Western Europe. In: Ruspini, E. and Dale, A. (eds.). The gender dimension of social change: The contribution of dynamic research to the study of women’s life courses. Bristol: Policy Press: 81–110.

Dewilde, C. and Uunk, W. (2008). Remarriage as a way to overcome the financial consequences of divorce: A test of the economic need hypothesis for European women. European Sociological Review 24(3): 393–407.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P. and McClintock, E.A. (2009). The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review 35(4): 797–816.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gałęzewska, P. (2016). Repartnering dynamics and fertility in new partnerships in Europe and the United States. [PhD thesis]. Southampton: University of Southampton, Faculty of Social, Human, and Mathematical Sciences, Division of Social Statistics and Demography.

Download reference:

Gelissen, J. (2003). Cross-national differences in public consent to divorce: Effects of cultural, structural, and compositional factors. In: Arts, W.A., Hagenaars, J.A., Halman, L., van de Donk, W., and van Schail, T. (eds.). The cultural diversity of European unity: Findings, explanations, and reflections from the European Values Study. Leiden: Brill: 339–370.

Download reference:

Goldscheider, F. and Kaufman, G. (2006). Willingness to stepparent: Attitudes about partners who already have children. Journal of Family Issues 27(10): 1415–1436.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Kaufman, G., and Sassler, S. (2009). Navigating the 'new' marriage market: How attitudes toward partner characteristics shape union formation. Journal of Family Issues 30(6): 719–737.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F. and Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the study of union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 275–291.

Download reference:

Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage pattern in perspective. In: Glass, D.V. and Eversley, D.E.C. (eds.). Population in history: Essays in historical demography. Chicago: Aldine: 101–143.

Download reference:

Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review 8(3): 449–494.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. and Morgan, S.P. (2008). The quality of retrospective data on cohabitation. Demography 45(1): 129–141.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J.M., and Furstenberg, F.F., Jr. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population 29(4): 417–444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jansen, M., Mortelmans, D., and Snoeckx, L. (2009). Repartnering and (re)employment: Strategies to cope with the economic consequences of partnership dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1271–1293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jaschinski, I. (2011). Der Übergang in eine nacheheliche Partnerschaft: Eine vergleichende Analyse zwischen Männern und Frauen auf Basis des deutschen Generations and Gender Survey. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23(2): 219–240.

Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243–263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Katus, K., Puur, A., Põldma, A., and Sakkeus, L. (2007). First union formation in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Patterns across countries and gender. Demographic Research 17(10): 247–300.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography 51(2): 1–12.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koo, H.P., Suchindran, C.M., and Griffith, J.D. (1984). The effects of children on divorce and re-marriage: A multivariate analysis of life table probabilities. Population Studies 38(3): 451–471.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Köppen, K. (2011). Marriage and cohabitation in Western Germany and France. [PhD thesis]. Rostock: Universität Rostock, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.

Download reference:

Lampard, R. and Peggs, K. (1999). Repartnering: The relevance of parenthood and gender to cohabitation and remarriage among the formerly married. The British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 443–465.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. and Noack, T. (2015). The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway: Findings from focus group research. Demographic Research 32(9): 287–310.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T. and Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(4): 861–878.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Turner, R.N., and Sassler, S. (2010). National estimates of the rise in serial cohabitation. Social Science Research 39(5): 754–765.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Fokkema, T. (2008). Recent trends in demographic attitudes and behaviour: Is the second demographic transition moving to Southern and Eastern Europe? In: Surkyn, J., Deboosere, P., and Van Bavel, J. (eds.). Demographic challenges for the 21st century: A state of the art in demography. Brussels: VUBPress: 115–141.

Download reference:

Lyngstad, T.H., Noack, T., and Tufte, P.A. (2011). Pooling of economic resources: A comparison of Norwegian married and cohabiting couples. European Sociological Review 27(5): 624–635.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2008). Repartnering after marital dissolution: Does context play a role? Demographic Research 19(57): 1913–1934.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murinkó, L. and Szalma, I. (2016). Fatherhood and men’s second union formation: Norway, France, and Hungary, 1980–2000. In: Mortelmans, D., Matthijs, K., Alofs, E., and Segaert, B. (eds.). Changing family dynamics and demographic evolution: The Family Kaleidoscope. Cheltenham: Elgar: 179–213.

Download reference:

Mynarska, M. and Bernardi, L. (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation. Demographic Research 16(17): 519–554.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mynarska, M. and Matysiak, A. (2010). Diffusion of cohabitation in Poland. Studia Demograficzne 157(1–2): 11–25.

Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1992). Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective. European Journal of Population 8(1): 23–45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Sigle-Rushton, W. (2005). Partner supply in Britain and the US: Estimates and gender contrasts. Population 60(1–2): 37–64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ozawa, M.N. and Yoon, H.-S. (2002). The economic benefit of remarriage. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 36(3–4): 21–39.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Berrington, A., Sanchez Gassen, N., Gałęzewska, P., and Holland, J. (2017). The rise in divorce and cohabitation: Is there a link? Population Development Review 43(2): 303–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gerber, T.P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography 48(1): 317–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories (Revised February 2012). Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPI Working Paper WP 2010-011).

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167–182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M. (2016). Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context. Social Forces 95(1): 251–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klaerner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pirani, E. and Vignoli, D. (2016). Changes in the satisfaction of cohabitors relative to spouses over time. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(3): 598–609.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.-R. (2007). The first cut is the deepest? The role of the relationship career for union formation. European Sociological Review 23(5): 585–598.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raeymaeckers, P., Dewilde, C., Snoeckx, L., and Mortelmans, D. (2008). Childcare strategies of divorced mothers in Europe: A comparative analysis. European Sociological Review 24(1): 115–131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raley, R.K. and Bumpass, L.L. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research 8(8): 245–260.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rault, W. and Régnier-Loilier, A. (2015). First cohabiting relationships: Recent trends in France. Paris: Instituté National DéEtudes Démographiqés (Population and Sociétés No. 521).

Download reference:

Regnier-Loilier, A., Beaujouan, É., and Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (2009). Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of living apart together in France. Demographic Research 21(4): 75–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, A. and Prioux, F. (2015). Family behaviours and religious practice in France. In: Régnier-Loilier, A. (ed.). The contemporary family in France: Partnership trajectories and domestic organization. Cham: Springer: 87–111.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rijken, A.J. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2012). European views of divorce among parents of young children: Understanding cross-national variation. Demographic Research 27(2): 25–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sánchez Gassen, N. and Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of union status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy 25(4): 431–449.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Shafer, K. and James, S.L. (2013). Gender and socioeconomic status differences in first and second marriage formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(3): 544–564.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Skew, A., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2009). Repartnering in the United Kingdom and Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40(4): 561–585.

Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sodermans, A.K., Matthijs, K., and Vanassche, S. (2013). Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents. Demographic Research 28(15): 421–432.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Soons, J.P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1141–1157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spijker, J.J.A. (2012). Divorce Atlas [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spruijt, E. and Duindam, V. (2009). Joint physical custody in the Netherlands and the well-being of children. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 51(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stewart, S.D. (2005). Boundary ambiguity in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Issues 26(7): 1002–1029.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stewart, S.D., Manning, W.D., and Smock, P.J. (2003). Union formation among men in the US: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family 65(1): 90–104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition in Northern, Western, and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research 3: 45–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. (2002). Remarriage and the nature of divorce: Does it matter which spouse chose to leave? Journal of Family Issues 23(3): 410–440.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. (1997). Remarriage of women and men after divorce: The role of socioeconomic prospects. Journal of Family Issues 18(5): 479–502.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Syltevik, L.J. (2010). Sense and sensibility: Cohabitation in ‘cohabitation land’. The Sociological Review 58(3): 444–462.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Teitler, J.O., Reichman, N.E., and Koball, H. (2006). Contemporaneous versus retrospective reports of cohabitation in the Fragile Families Survey. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 469–477.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Theunis, L., Pasteels, I., and Van Bavel, J. (2015). Educational assortative mating after divorce: Persistence or divergence from first marriages? Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 27: 183–202.

Download reference:

Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography 51(2): 485–508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Uunk, W. (2004). The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: The impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population 20(3): 251–285.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Damme, M., Kalmijn, M., and Uunk, W. (2009). The employment of separated women in Europe: Individual and institutional determinants. European Sociological Review 25(2): 183–197.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., Matthijs, K., and Swicegood, G. (2015). Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: Differences according to parental status and custodial arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review 34(5): 761–784.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vespa, J. (2014). Historical trends in the marital intentions of one-time and serial cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(1): 207–217.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z. (1994). Remarriage in Canada: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 21(3–4): 191–224.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z. and Balakrishnan, T.R. (1994). Cohabitation after marital disruption in Canada. Journal of Marriage and Family 56(3): 723–734.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z. and Schimmele, C.M. (2005). Repartnering after first union disruption. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(1): 27–36.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article