Volume 39 - Article 27 | Pages 753–794  

The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States

By Júlia Mikolai, Ann Berrington, Brienna Perelli-Harris

References

Andersson, G., Thomson, E., and Duntava, A. (2017). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research 37(35): 1081–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population 19(2): 147–169.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F.C. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage, and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment 25(6): 531–561.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2003). Change and continuity in family formation among young adults in Britain. Southampton: Statistical Sciences Research Institute (S3RI Applications and Policy Working Papers, A03/04).

Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A., Perelli-Harris, B., and Trevena, P. (2015). Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK. Demographic Research 33(12): 327–362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2–3): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2016). Why still marry? The role of feelings in the persistence of marriage as an institution. The British Journal of Sociology 67(3): 516–540.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brien, M.J., Lillard, L.A., and Waite, L.J. (1999). Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception. Demography 36(4): 535–551.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L. and Lu, H.H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies 54(1): 29–41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Vintage Books.

Download reference:

de Wreede, L.C., Fiocco, M., and Putter, H. (2011). Mstate: An r package for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Journal of Statistical Software 38(7): 1–30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dominguez-Folgueras, M. and Castro-Martin, T. (2013). Cohabitation in Spain: No longer a marginal path to family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(2): 422–437.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Elder, G.H.J. (1975). Age differentiation and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology 1: 165–190.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population 23(3–4): 225–250.

Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Furstenberg, F.F. (2014). Fifty years of family change: From consensus to complexity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 12–30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C. and Rackin, H. (2014). Marriage or carriage? Trends in union context and birth type by education. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 506–519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R. and Kenney, C.T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for US women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506–519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Härkönen, J. and Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review 22(5): 501–517.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Keizer, R. (2015). Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage. Demographic Research 32(10): 311–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hoem, J.M., Gabrielli, G., Jasilioniene, A., Kostova, D., and Matysiak, A. (2010). Levels of recent union formation: Six European countries compared. Demographic Research 22(9): 199–210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hoem, J.M., Kostova, D., Jasilioniene, A., and Muresan, C. (2009). Traces of the second demographic transition in four selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation. European Journal of Population 25(3): 239–255.

Download reference:

Holland, J.A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research 29(11): 275–306. .

Weblink:
Download reference:

ISCED (1997). International standard classification of education [electronic resource]. Geneva: UNESCO.

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243–263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2013). The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries. Demography 50(4): 1499–1520.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population 27(3): 269–293.

Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Bumpass, L.L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19(47): 1663–1692.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2002). The state of European Unions: An analysis of partnership formation and dissolution. In: Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: Insights and lessons from comparative research. New York: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: 57–75.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: Here to stay? European perspectives. In: Moynihan, D.P., Smeeding, T.M., and Rainwater, L. (eds.). The future of the family. New York: Russel Sage: 66–95.

Download reference:

Koytcheva, E. and Philipov, D. (2008). Bulgaria: Ethnic differentials in rapidly declining fertility. Demographic Research 19(3): 361–402.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population 21(1): 31–49.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D.J.. (1986). Twee demografische transities? [Two demographic transitions?]. In: van de Kaa, D.J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (eds.). Bevolking: Groei en krimp [Population: Growth and crimp]. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus: 9–24.

Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Qian, Z., and Mellott, L.M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography 43(2): 223–240.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Sassler, S., and Turner, R.N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility. Social Science Research 47: 134–147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lyngstad, T. and Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research 23(10): 257–292.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? Journal of Family Issues 23(8): 1065–1087.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 989–1002.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Matysiak, A., Styrc, M., and Vignoli, D. (2014). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies 68(2): 197–215.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mayer, K.U. (2004). The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies. In: Woodward, A. and Kohli, M. (eds.). Inclusions and exclusions in European societies. London: Routledge: 89–110.

Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. and Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 257–276.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J. (2012). With or without you: Partnership context of first conceptions and births in Hungary. Demográfia English Edition 55(5): 37–60.

Download reference:

Mikolai, J. and Lyons-Amos, M.J. (2017). Longitudinal methods for life course research: A comparison of sequence analysis, latent class growth models, and multistate event history models for studying partnership transitions. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 8(2): 191–208.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Muresan, C., Haragus, P.-T., Haragus, M., and Schröder, C. (2008). Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context. Demographic Research 19(23): 855–906.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process. Demographic Research 16(9): 249–286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(4): 915–929.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K., England, P., Edington, S., and Kangas, N. (2009). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces 88(2): 543–572.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In: Waite, L.J. (ed.). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter: 283–301.

Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 431–453.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gerber, T.P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography 48(1): 317–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M.J. (2016). Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context. Social Forces 95(1): 251–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Bernardi, L. (2015). Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture. Demographic Research 33(25): 701–732.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories: Manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR Working Paper WP-2010-011).

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167–182.

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M. (2015). Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 33(6): 145–178.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a deeper understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Sánchez-Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Putter, H., van der Hage, J., de Bock, G.H., Elgalta, R., and van de Velde, C.J.H. (2006). Estimation and prediction in a multi-state model for breast cancer. Biometrical Journal 48(3): 366–380.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raley, K.R. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: Evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States? Demography 38(1): 59–66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J., Carlson, M.J., VanOrman, A., Lim, S., Perelli-Harris, B., and Iwasawa, M. (2015). Educational differences in early childbearing: A cross-national comparative study. Demographic Research 33(3): 65–92.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reed, J. (2006). Not crossing the ‘extra line’: How cohabitors with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(5): 1117–1131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R., Morgan, S.P., and Offutt, K. (1996). Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989. Demography 33(3): 277–290.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Miller, A.J. (2011). Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations 60(2): 163–177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 921–928.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(2): 1247–1268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J., Manning, W.D., and Porter, M. (2005). Everything’s there except money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680–696.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., and Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography 42(4): 647–673.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 27–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research Special Collection 3(3): 45–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., and Teachman, J.D. (1995). The influence of school enrolment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review 60(5): 762–774.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Upchurch, D.M., Lillard, L.A., and Panis, C.W.A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography 39(2): 311–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ventura, S.J. (2009). Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS Data Brief No. 18).

Download reference:

Weakliem, D.L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions: An international study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14(2): 141–157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2010). Lover or money? Marriage intentions among young cohabitors in Norway and Sweden. Acta Sociologica 53(3): 269–287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article