Volume 44 - Article 13 | Pages 333–348
Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study
By Anne Gauthier, Caroline Bryson, Luisa Fadel, Tina Haux, Judith Koops, Monika Mynarska
Abstract
Background: In recent decades there has been growing interest in the concept of intensive parenting. However, the literature is mostly qualitative and based on Anglo-Saxon countries. This raises the question of how best to operationalise the concept in a wider cross-national setting.
Objective: This paper aims to operationalise the theoretical concept of intensive parenting in a cross-national perspective.
Methods: The data for this study come from the CROss-National Online Survey panel [CRONOS], conducted in Estonia, Great Britain, and Slovenia in 2017. The analysis is based on 18 items on norms related to raising children. Exploratory factor analyses were carried out to identify dimensions of intensive parenting. Variation by respondents’ sociodemographics for the different dimensions was also analysed.
Results: The results reveal four main dimensions regarding contemporary norms of parenting: a child-centred approach, a focus on stimulating children’s development, personal responsibility to do one’s best for one’s children, and pressure to follow experts’ advice. These four dimensions were found in all three countries.
Conclusions: The results partly confirm the conception of intensive parenting originally suggested by Hays (1986). They also reveal that the phenomenon is not restricted to Anglo-Saxon countries but can be operationalised in a similar way in other countries. The findings also reveal some variation by sociodemographic characteristics, but not in a systematic way.
Contribution: This is the first study to use random probability population-based samples to operationalise the concept of intensive parenting in a cross-national perspective.
Author's Affiliation
- Anne Gauthier - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands EMAIL
- Caroline Bryson - Bryson Purdon Social Research LLP (BPSR), United Kingdom EMAIL
- Luisa Fadel - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands EMAIL
- Tina Haux - University of Kent, United Kingdom EMAIL
- Judith Koops - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands EMAIL
- Monika Mynarska - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 49 - Article 3
Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
Volume 31 - Article 36
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Ultra-Orthodox fertility and marriage in the United States: Evidence from the American Community Survey
Volume 49 - Article 29
| Keywords:
age at first marriage,
American Community Survey (ACS),
fertility,
Judaism,
marriage,
religion,
total fertility rate (TFR),
Ultra-Orthodox Judaism
Advanced or postponed motherhood? Migrants’ and natives’ gap between ideal and actual age at first birth in Spain
Volume 49 - Article 22
| Keywords:
actual age at first birth,
age at arrival,
fertility,
ideal age at first birth,
international migration,
motherhood,
Spain
Describing the Dutch Social Networks and Fertility Study and how to process it
Volume 49 - Article 19
| Keywords:
fertility,
Netherlands,
personal networks,
social influence
Partial fertility recuperation in Spain two years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
Volume 49 - Article 17
| Keywords:
COVID-19,
fertility,
recuperation,
Spain
The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 49 - Article 3
| Keywords:
accuracy,
data quality,
fertility,
Generations and Gender Survey (GGS)
Cited References: 29
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar